Prenatal prediction of neonatal outcome in the extremely low-birth- weight infant

R. O. Bahado-Singh, J. Dashe, O. Deren, G. Daftary, J. A. Copel, R. A. Ehrenkranz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to identify prenatally available parameters that correlate with neonatal outcome and could be used for predicting such outcome in the extremely low-birth-weight pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: From 1990 through 1995, obstetric and neonatal data of live-born nonanomalous singleton infants with birth weights between 400 and 1000 gm were reviewed. Only cases in which ultrasonographic biometry, including biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, and femur length, was performed ≤3 days before delivery were included. Overall survival (defined as alive at discharge) and survival without specific severe neonatal morbidities (namely, retinopathy of prematurity [stage 3 or 4], intraventricular hemorrhage [grade 3 or 4], periventricular leukomalacia, chronic lung disease, and deafness) were ascertained. The best combination of prenatal parameters for the prediction of overall survival and survival without severe morbidity was determined by backward stepwise logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The most significant prenatal predictors of overall survival were the obstetric estimate of gestational age and the abdominal circumference (χ2 = 11.8036, p = 0.0006 and χ2 = 8.1862, p < 0.005, respectively). Survival without severe morbidity was also predicted by the same combination of parameters (χ2 = 21.9079, p = 0.0001 and χ2 = 6.538, p = 0.01, respectively). The estimated fetal weight was not a significant independent predictor of either category of outcome (χ2 = 0.1249, p = 0.72 and χ2 = 0.0361, p = 0.85, respectively). On the basis of the regression formulas, curves displaying the probabilities of overall survival and survival without severe morbidity with any combination of gestational age and abdominal circumference were developed. CONCLUSION: The combination of gestational age and the abdominal circumference measurements appears to be superior to any combination that included estimated fetal weight data for predicting neonatal outcome in the neonates weighing ≤1000 gm. We developed a mechanism for predicting neonatal outcome in this weight category on the basis of prenatally available parameters. This information could prove useful for both parental counseling and obstetric decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)462-468
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume178
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Extremely Low Birth Weight Infant
Gestational Age
Obstetrics
Morbidity
Fetal Weight
Periventricular Leukomalacia
Biometry
Retinopathy of Prematurity
Low Birth Weight Infant
Deafness
Birth Weight
Femur
Lung Diseases
Counseling
Decision Making
Chronic Disease
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Hemorrhage
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Extreme prematurity
  • Neonatal morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Prenatal prediction of neonatal outcome in the extremely low-birth- weight infant. / Bahado-Singh, R. O.; Dashe, J.; Deren, O.; Daftary, G.; Copel, J. A.; Ehrenkranz, R. A.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 178, No. 3, 1998, p. 462-468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bahado-Singh, R. O. ; Dashe, J. ; Deren, O. ; Daftary, G. ; Copel, J. A. ; Ehrenkranz, R. A. / Prenatal prediction of neonatal outcome in the extremely low-birth- weight infant. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1998 ; Vol. 178, No. 3. pp. 462-468.
@article{005cfa119bdb49fd9b503e1ea214850a,
title = "Prenatal prediction of neonatal outcome in the extremely low-birth- weight infant",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to identify prenatally available parameters that correlate with neonatal outcome and could be used for predicting such outcome in the extremely low-birth-weight pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: From 1990 through 1995, obstetric and neonatal data of live-born nonanomalous singleton infants with birth weights between 400 and 1000 gm were reviewed. Only cases in which ultrasonographic biometry, including biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, and femur length, was performed ≤3 days before delivery were included. Overall survival (defined as alive at discharge) and survival without specific severe neonatal morbidities (namely, retinopathy of prematurity [stage 3 or 4], intraventricular hemorrhage [grade 3 or 4], periventricular leukomalacia, chronic lung disease, and deafness) were ascertained. The best combination of prenatal parameters for the prediction of overall survival and survival without severe morbidity was determined by backward stepwise logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The most significant prenatal predictors of overall survival were the obstetric estimate of gestational age and the abdominal circumference (χ2 = 11.8036, p = 0.0006 and χ2 = 8.1862, p < 0.005, respectively). Survival without severe morbidity was also predicted by the same combination of parameters (χ2 = 21.9079, p = 0.0001 and χ2 = 6.538, p = 0.01, respectively). The estimated fetal weight was not a significant independent predictor of either category of outcome (χ2 = 0.1249, p = 0.72 and χ2 = 0.0361, p = 0.85, respectively). On the basis of the regression formulas, curves displaying the probabilities of overall survival and survival without severe morbidity with any combination of gestational age and abdominal circumference were developed. CONCLUSION: The combination of gestational age and the abdominal circumference measurements appears to be superior to any combination that included estimated fetal weight data for predicting neonatal outcome in the neonates weighing ≤1000 gm. We developed a mechanism for predicting neonatal outcome in this weight category on the basis of prenatally available parameters. This information could prove useful for both parental counseling and obstetric decision making.",
keywords = "Extreme prematurity, Neonatal morbidity",
author = "Bahado-Singh, {R. O.} and J. Dashe and O. Deren and G. Daftary and Copel, {J. A.} and Ehrenkranz, {R. A.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70421-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "178",
pages = "462--468",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prenatal prediction of neonatal outcome in the extremely low-birth- weight infant

AU - Bahado-Singh, R. O.

AU - Dashe, J.

AU - Deren, O.

AU - Daftary, G.

AU - Copel, J. A.

AU - Ehrenkranz, R. A.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to identify prenatally available parameters that correlate with neonatal outcome and could be used for predicting such outcome in the extremely low-birth-weight pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: From 1990 through 1995, obstetric and neonatal data of live-born nonanomalous singleton infants with birth weights between 400 and 1000 gm were reviewed. Only cases in which ultrasonographic biometry, including biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, and femur length, was performed ≤3 days before delivery were included. Overall survival (defined as alive at discharge) and survival without specific severe neonatal morbidities (namely, retinopathy of prematurity [stage 3 or 4], intraventricular hemorrhage [grade 3 or 4], periventricular leukomalacia, chronic lung disease, and deafness) were ascertained. The best combination of prenatal parameters for the prediction of overall survival and survival without severe morbidity was determined by backward stepwise logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The most significant prenatal predictors of overall survival were the obstetric estimate of gestational age and the abdominal circumference (χ2 = 11.8036, p = 0.0006 and χ2 = 8.1862, p < 0.005, respectively). Survival without severe morbidity was also predicted by the same combination of parameters (χ2 = 21.9079, p = 0.0001 and χ2 = 6.538, p = 0.01, respectively). The estimated fetal weight was not a significant independent predictor of either category of outcome (χ2 = 0.1249, p = 0.72 and χ2 = 0.0361, p = 0.85, respectively). On the basis of the regression formulas, curves displaying the probabilities of overall survival and survival without severe morbidity with any combination of gestational age and abdominal circumference were developed. CONCLUSION: The combination of gestational age and the abdominal circumference measurements appears to be superior to any combination that included estimated fetal weight data for predicting neonatal outcome in the neonates weighing ≤1000 gm. We developed a mechanism for predicting neonatal outcome in this weight category on the basis of prenatally available parameters. This information could prove useful for both parental counseling and obstetric decision making.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to identify prenatally available parameters that correlate with neonatal outcome and could be used for predicting such outcome in the extremely low-birth-weight pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: From 1990 through 1995, obstetric and neonatal data of live-born nonanomalous singleton infants with birth weights between 400 and 1000 gm were reviewed. Only cases in which ultrasonographic biometry, including biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, and femur length, was performed ≤3 days before delivery were included. Overall survival (defined as alive at discharge) and survival without specific severe neonatal morbidities (namely, retinopathy of prematurity [stage 3 or 4], intraventricular hemorrhage [grade 3 or 4], periventricular leukomalacia, chronic lung disease, and deafness) were ascertained. The best combination of prenatal parameters for the prediction of overall survival and survival without severe morbidity was determined by backward stepwise logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The most significant prenatal predictors of overall survival were the obstetric estimate of gestational age and the abdominal circumference (χ2 = 11.8036, p = 0.0006 and χ2 = 8.1862, p < 0.005, respectively). Survival without severe morbidity was also predicted by the same combination of parameters (χ2 = 21.9079, p = 0.0001 and χ2 = 6.538, p = 0.01, respectively). The estimated fetal weight was not a significant independent predictor of either category of outcome (χ2 = 0.1249, p = 0.72 and χ2 = 0.0361, p = 0.85, respectively). On the basis of the regression formulas, curves displaying the probabilities of overall survival and survival without severe morbidity with any combination of gestational age and abdominal circumference were developed. CONCLUSION: The combination of gestational age and the abdominal circumference measurements appears to be superior to any combination that included estimated fetal weight data for predicting neonatal outcome in the neonates weighing ≤1000 gm. We developed a mechanism for predicting neonatal outcome in this weight category on the basis of prenatally available parameters. This information could prove useful for both parental counseling and obstetric decision making.

KW - Extreme prematurity

KW - Neonatal morbidity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031957810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031957810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70421-1

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70421-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 9539509

AN - SCOPUS:0031957810

VL - 178

SP - 462

EP - 468

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 3

ER -