Preparing for the American Board of Surgery Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum: Development of multi-institutional proficiency-based training standards and pilot testing of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum for the Endoscopy Training System

Brenton R. Franklin, Sarah B. Placek, Aimee K. Gardner, James R. Korndorffer, Mercy D. Wagner, Jonathan P. Pearl, E. Matthew Ritter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) exam is required for American Board of Surgery certification. The purpose of this study was to develop performance standards for a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum for the FES performance exam using the Endoscopy Training System (ETS). Methods: Experienced endoscopists from multiple institutions and specialties performed each ETS task (scope manipulation (SM), tool targeting (TT), retroflexion (RF), loop management (LM), and mucosal inspection (MI)) with scores used to develop performance standards for a SBML training curriculum. Trainees completed the curriculum to determine feasibility, and effect on FES performance. Results: Task specific training standards were determined (SM-121sec, TT-243sec, RF-159sec, LM-261sec, MI-180-480sec, 7 polyps). Trainees required 29.5 ± 3.7 training trials over 2.75 ± 0.5 training sessions to complete the SBML curriculum. Despite high baseline FES performance, scores improved (pre 73.4 ± 7, post 78.1 ± 5.2; effect size = 0.76, p > 0.1), but this was not statistically discernable. Conclusions: This SBML curriculum was feasible and improved FES scores in a group of high performers. This curriculum should be applied to novice endoscopists to determine effectiveness for FES exam preparation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-173
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume216
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Endoscopy
Learning
Certification
Polyps

Keywords

  • Endoscopic surgery
  • Endoscopy
  • Mastery learning
  • Simulation
  • Standard setting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Preparing for the American Board of Surgery Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum : Development of multi-institutional proficiency-based training standards and pilot testing of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum for the Endoscopy Training System. / Franklin, Brenton R.; Placek, Sarah B.; Gardner, Aimee K.; Korndorffer, James R.; Wagner, Mercy D.; Pearl, Jonathan P.; Ritter, E. Matthew.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 216, No. 1, 01.07.2018, p. 167-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de35fbb705144761bcab0ad26ccc85fb,
title = "Preparing for the American Board of Surgery Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum: Development of multi-institutional proficiency-based training standards and pilot testing of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum for the Endoscopy Training System",
abstract = "Background: The Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) exam is required for American Board of Surgery certification. The purpose of this study was to develop performance standards for a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum for the FES performance exam using the Endoscopy Training System (ETS). Methods: Experienced endoscopists from multiple institutions and specialties performed each ETS task (scope manipulation (SM), tool targeting (TT), retroflexion (RF), loop management (LM), and mucosal inspection (MI)) with scores used to develop performance standards for a SBML training curriculum. Trainees completed the curriculum to determine feasibility, and effect on FES performance. Results: Task specific training standards were determined (SM-121sec, TT-243sec, RF-159sec, LM-261sec, MI-180-480sec, 7 polyps). Trainees required 29.5 ± 3.7 training trials over 2.75 ± 0.5 training sessions to complete the SBML curriculum. Despite high baseline FES performance, scores improved (pre 73.4 ± 7, post 78.1 ± 5.2; effect size = 0.76, p > 0.1), but this was not statistically discernable. Conclusions: This SBML curriculum was feasible and improved FES scores in a group of high performers. This curriculum should be applied to novice endoscopists to determine effectiveness for FES exam preparation.",
keywords = "Endoscopic surgery, Endoscopy, Mastery learning, Simulation, Standard setting",
author = "Franklin, {Brenton R.} and Placek, {Sarah B.} and Gardner, {Aimee K.} and Korndorffer, {James R.} and Wagner, {Mercy D.} and Pearl, {Jonathan P.} and Ritter, {E. Matthew}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "216",
pages = "167--173",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preparing for the American Board of Surgery Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum

T2 - Development of multi-institutional proficiency-based training standards and pilot testing of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum for the Endoscopy Training System

AU - Franklin, Brenton R.

AU - Placek, Sarah B.

AU - Gardner, Aimee K.

AU - Korndorffer, James R.

AU - Wagner, Mercy D.

AU - Pearl, Jonathan P.

AU - Ritter, E. Matthew

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Background: The Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) exam is required for American Board of Surgery certification. The purpose of this study was to develop performance standards for a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum for the FES performance exam using the Endoscopy Training System (ETS). Methods: Experienced endoscopists from multiple institutions and specialties performed each ETS task (scope manipulation (SM), tool targeting (TT), retroflexion (RF), loop management (LM), and mucosal inspection (MI)) with scores used to develop performance standards for a SBML training curriculum. Trainees completed the curriculum to determine feasibility, and effect on FES performance. Results: Task specific training standards were determined (SM-121sec, TT-243sec, RF-159sec, LM-261sec, MI-180-480sec, 7 polyps). Trainees required 29.5 ± 3.7 training trials over 2.75 ± 0.5 training sessions to complete the SBML curriculum. Despite high baseline FES performance, scores improved (pre 73.4 ± 7, post 78.1 ± 5.2; effect size = 0.76, p > 0.1), but this was not statistically discernable. Conclusions: This SBML curriculum was feasible and improved FES scores in a group of high performers. This curriculum should be applied to novice endoscopists to determine effectiveness for FES exam preparation.

AB - Background: The Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) exam is required for American Board of Surgery certification. The purpose of this study was to develop performance standards for a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum for the FES performance exam using the Endoscopy Training System (ETS). Methods: Experienced endoscopists from multiple institutions and specialties performed each ETS task (scope manipulation (SM), tool targeting (TT), retroflexion (RF), loop management (LM), and mucosal inspection (MI)) with scores used to develop performance standards for a SBML training curriculum. Trainees completed the curriculum to determine feasibility, and effect on FES performance. Results: Task specific training standards were determined (SM-121sec, TT-243sec, RF-159sec, LM-261sec, MI-180-480sec, 7 polyps). Trainees required 29.5 ± 3.7 training trials over 2.75 ± 0.5 training sessions to complete the SBML curriculum. Despite high baseline FES performance, scores improved (pre 73.4 ± 7, post 78.1 ± 5.2; effect size = 0.76, p > 0.1), but this was not statistically discernable. Conclusions: This SBML curriculum was feasible and improved FES scores in a group of high performers. This curriculum should be applied to novice endoscopists to determine effectiveness for FES exam preparation.

KW - Endoscopic surgery

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Mastery learning

KW - Simulation

KW - Standard setting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048530911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048530911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 28974312

AN - SCOPUS:85048530911

VL - 216

SP - 167

EP - 173

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 1

ER -