Preventing deaths and injuries from house fires: An outcome evaluation of a community-based smoke alarm installation programme

Gregory R. Istre, Mary A. McCoy, Billy J. Moore, Carey Roper, Shelli Stephens-Stidham, Jeffrey J. Barnard, Debra K. Carlin, Martha Stowe, Ron J. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Few studies have examined the impact of community-based smoke alarm (SA) distribution programmes on the occurrence of house fire-related deaths and injuries (HF-D/I). Objective To determine whether the rate of HF-D/I differed for programme houses that had a SA installed through a community-based programme called Operation Installation, versus non-programme houses in the same census tracts that had not received such a SA. Methods Teams of volunteers and firefighters canvassed houses in 36 high-risk target census tracts in Dallas, TX, between April 2001 and April 2011, and installed lithium-powered SAs in houses where residents were present and gave permission. We then followed incidence of HF-D/I among residents of the 8134 programme houses versus the 24 346 non-programme houses. Results After a mean of 5.2 years of follow-up, the unadjusted HF-D/I rate was 68% lower among residents of programme houses versus non-programme houses (3.1 vs 9.6 per 100 000 population, respectively; rate ratio, 0.32; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.84). Multivariate analysis including several demographic variables showed that the adjusted HF-D/I rate in programme houses was 63% lower than non-programme houses. The programme was most effective in the first 5 years after SA installation, with declining difference in rates after the 6th year, probably due to SAs becoming non-functional during that time. Conclusions This collaborative, community-based SA installation programme was effective at preventing deaths and injuries from house fires, but the duration of effectiveness was less than 10 years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-102
Number of pages6
JournalInjury Prevention
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Smoke
Wounds and Injuries
Censuses
Firefighters
Mortality
Lithium
Volunteers
Multivariate Analysis
Demography
Incidence
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Preventing deaths and injuries from house fires : An outcome evaluation of a community-based smoke alarm installation programme. / Istre, Gregory R.; McCoy, Mary A.; Moore, Billy J.; Roper, Carey; Stephens-Stidham, Shelli; Barnard, Jeffrey J.; Carlin, Debra K.; Stowe, Martha; Anderson, Ron J.

In: Injury Prevention, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2014, p. 97-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Istre, GR, McCoy, MA, Moore, BJ, Roper, C, Stephens-Stidham, S, Barnard, JJ, Carlin, DK, Stowe, M & Anderson, RJ 2014, 'Preventing deaths and injuries from house fires: An outcome evaluation of a community-based smoke alarm installation programme', Injury Prevention, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040824
Istre, Gregory R. ; McCoy, Mary A. ; Moore, Billy J. ; Roper, Carey ; Stephens-Stidham, Shelli ; Barnard, Jeffrey J. ; Carlin, Debra K. ; Stowe, Martha ; Anderson, Ron J. / Preventing deaths and injuries from house fires : An outcome evaluation of a community-based smoke alarm installation programme. In: Injury Prevention. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 97-102.
@article{180dddf441f5402db5bb9dda7ff15bb1,
title = "Preventing deaths and injuries from house fires: An outcome evaluation of a community-based smoke alarm installation programme",
abstract = "Background Few studies have examined the impact of community-based smoke alarm (SA) distribution programmes on the occurrence of house fire-related deaths and injuries (HF-D/I). Objective To determine whether the rate of HF-D/I differed for programme houses that had a SA installed through a community-based programme called Operation Installation, versus non-programme houses in the same census tracts that had not received such a SA. Methods Teams of volunteers and firefighters canvassed houses in 36 high-risk target census tracts in Dallas, TX, between April 2001 and April 2011, and installed lithium-powered SAs in houses where residents were present and gave permission. We then followed incidence of HF-D/I among residents of the 8134 programme houses versus the 24 346 non-programme houses. Results After a mean of 5.2 years of follow-up, the unadjusted HF-D/I rate was 68{\%} lower among residents of programme houses versus non-programme houses (3.1 vs 9.6 per 100 000 population, respectively; rate ratio, 0.32; 95{\%} CI 0.10 to 0.84). Multivariate analysis including several demographic variables showed that the adjusted HF-D/I rate in programme houses was 63{\%} lower than non-programme houses. The programme was most effective in the first 5 years after SA installation, with declining difference in rates after the 6th year, probably due to SAs becoming non-functional during that time. Conclusions This collaborative, community-based SA installation programme was effective at preventing deaths and injuries from house fires, but the duration of effectiveness was less than 10 years.",
author = "Istre, {Gregory R.} and McCoy, {Mary A.} and Moore, {Billy J.} and Carey Roper and Shelli Stephens-Stidham and Barnard, {Jeffrey J.} and Carlin, {Debra K.} and Martha Stowe and Anderson, {Ron J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040824",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "97--102",
journal = "Injury Prevention",
issn = "1353-8047",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preventing deaths and injuries from house fires

T2 - An outcome evaluation of a community-based smoke alarm installation programme

AU - Istre, Gregory R.

AU - McCoy, Mary A.

AU - Moore, Billy J.

AU - Roper, Carey

AU - Stephens-Stidham, Shelli

AU - Barnard, Jeffrey J.

AU - Carlin, Debra K.

AU - Stowe, Martha

AU - Anderson, Ron J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background Few studies have examined the impact of community-based smoke alarm (SA) distribution programmes on the occurrence of house fire-related deaths and injuries (HF-D/I). Objective To determine whether the rate of HF-D/I differed for programme houses that had a SA installed through a community-based programme called Operation Installation, versus non-programme houses in the same census tracts that had not received such a SA. Methods Teams of volunteers and firefighters canvassed houses in 36 high-risk target census tracts in Dallas, TX, between April 2001 and April 2011, and installed lithium-powered SAs in houses where residents were present and gave permission. We then followed incidence of HF-D/I among residents of the 8134 programme houses versus the 24 346 non-programme houses. Results After a mean of 5.2 years of follow-up, the unadjusted HF-D/I rate was 68% lower among residents of programme houses versus non-programme houses (3.1 vs 9.6 per 100 000 population, respectively; rate ratio, 0.32; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.84). Multivariate analysis including several demographic variables showed that the adjusted HF-D/I rate in programme houses was 63% lower than non-programme houses. The programme was most effective in the first 5 years after SA installation, with declining difference in rates after the 6th year, probably due to SAs becoming non-functional during that time. Conclusions This collaborative, community-based SA installation programme was effective at preventing deaths and injuries from house fires, but the duration of effectiveness was less than 10 years.

AB - Background Few studies have examined the impact of community-based smoke alarm (SA) distribution programmes on the occurrence of house fire-related deaths and injuries (HF-D/I). Objective To determine whether the rate of HF-D/I differed for programme houses that had a SA installed through a community-based programme called Operation Installation, versus non-programme houses in the same census tracts that had not received such a SA. Methods Teams of volunteers and firefighters canvassed houses in 36 high-risk target census tracts in Dallas, TX, between April 2001 and April 2011, and installed lithium-powered SAs in houses where residents were present and gave permission. We then followed incidence of HF-D/I among residents of the 8134 programme houses versus the 24 346 non-programme houses. Results After a mean of 5.2 years of follow-up, the unadjusted HF-D/I rate was 68% lower among residents of programme houses versus non-programme houses (3.1 vs 9.6 per 100 000 population, respectively; rate ratio, 0.32; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.84). Multivariate analysis including several demographic variables showed that the adjusted HF-D/I rate in programme houses was 63% lower than non-programme houses. The programme was most effective in the first 5 years after SA installation, with declining difference in rates after the 6th year, probably due to SAs becoming non-functional during that time. Conclusions This collaborative, community-based SA installation programme was effective at preventing deaths and injuries from house fires, but the duration of effectiveness was less than 10 years.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896495307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896495307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040824

DO - 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040824

M3 - Article

C2 - 23873498

AN - SCOPUS:84896495307

VL - 20

SP - 97

EP - 102

JO - Injury Prevention

JF - Injury Prevention

SN - 1353-8047

IS - 2

ER -