Preventing the crankshaft phenomenon by combining anterior fusion with posterior instrumentation: Does it work?

A. S. Lapinsky, B. S. Richards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Fourteen skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis (Group I) were retrospectively studied to determine if the crankshaft phenomenon was prevented by combining anterior spinal fusion with posterior instrumentation and fusion. They were compared with 12 similar patients who underwent posterior procedures only (Group II). Objectives. To determine whether the addition of anterior Spinal fusion was beneficial in preventing progressive spinet deformity in the very young patient. Summary of Background Data. The crankshaft phenomenon had been well documented in young patients undergoing posterior fusion only. No previous study compared the results of a similar group of patients some of whom underwent combined anterior and posterior fusion and the others who underwent posterior fusion only. Methods. Patients who were Risser 0 and had open triradiate cartilages at surgery were evaluated for curve correction, correction loss, changes in rib vertebral angle differences, rotational changes, and spinal balance. Crankshaft was defined as a progression in curve magnitude greater than 10° and accompanied by an increase in rib vertebral angle difference greater than 10°. In Group I, age at surgery averaged 10.7 years, and follow-up averaged 37 months. In Group II, age at surgery averaged 11.0 years, and follow-up averaged 64 months. Results. Group I: Thoracic curve correction averaged 77% after surgery and 68% at follow-up. At follow-up, two patients had curves progress more than 10°, and three patients had an increase in rib vertebral angle difference of 10° or more, but none of the patients had these changes simultaneously. Group II: During the course of follow-up, five of the 12 patients had progressive changes of 10° or more in curve size and rip vertebral angle difference. Four other patients had an increase exceeding 10° in one of the two categories. Conclusions. In skeletally immature children (open triradiate cartilage and Risser 0) with idiopathic scoliosis, the addition of anterior spinal fusion to posterior instrumentation and fusion is helpful in preventing the crankshaft phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1392-1398
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume20
Issue number12
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Spinal Fusion
Ribs
Scoliosis
Cartilage
Thorax
Age Groups

Keywords

  • anterior spinal fusion
  • crankshaft phenomenon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Preventing the crankshaft phenomenon by combining anterior fusion with posterior instrumentation : Does it work? / Lapinsky, A. S.; Richards, B. S.

In: Spine, Vol. 20, No. 12, 1995, p. 1392-1398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f6efabceecdc4acaabb00259bd67051f,
title = "Preventing the crankshaft phenomenon by combining anterior fusion with posterior instrumentation: Does it work?",
abstract = "Study Design. Fourteen skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis (Group I) were retrospectively studied to determine if the crankshaft phenomenon was prevented by combining anterior spinal fusion with posterior instrumentation and fusion. They were compared with 12 similar patients who underwent posterior procedures only (Group II). Objectives. To determine whether the addition of anterior Spinal fusion was beneficial in preventing progressive spinet deformity in the very young patient. Summary of Background Data. The crankshaft phenomenon had been well documented in young patients undergoing posterior fusion only. No previous study compared the results of a similar group of patients some of whom underwent combined anterior and posterior fusion and the others who underwent posterior fusion only. Methods. Patients who were Risser 0 and had open triradiate cartilages at surgery were evaluated for curve correction, correction loss, changes in rib vertebral angle differences, rotational changes, and spinal balance. Crankshaft was defined as a progression in curve magnitude greater than 10° and accompanied by an increase in rib vertebral angle difference greater than 10°. In Group I, age at surgery averaged 10.7 years, and follow-up averaged 37 months. In Group II, age at surgery averaged 11.0 years, and follow-up averaged 64 months. Results. Group I: Thoracic curve correction averaged 77{\%} after surgery and 68{\%} at follow-up. At follow-up, two patients had curves progress more than 10°, and three patients had an increase in rib vertebral angle difference of 10° or more, but none of the patients had these changes simultaneously. Group II: During the course of follow-up, five of the 12 patients had progressive changes of 10° or more in curve size and rip vertebral angle difference. Four other patients had an increase exceeding 10° in one of the two categories. Conclusions. In skeletally immature children (open triradiate cartilage and Risser 0) with idiopathic scoliosis, the addition of anterior spinal fusion to posterior instrumentation and fusion is helpful in preventing the crankshaft phenomenon.",
keywords = "anterior spinal fusion, crankshaft phenomenon",
author = "Lapinsky, {A. S.} and Richards, {B. S.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1392--1398",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preventing the crankshaft phenomenon by combining anterior fusion with posterior instrumentation

T2 - Does it work?

AU - Lapinsky, A. S.

AU - Richards, B. S.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Study Design. Fourteen skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis (Group I) were retrospectively studied to determine if the crankshaft phenomenon was prevented by combining anterior spinal fusion with posterior instrumentation and fusion. They were compared with 12 similar patients who underwent posterior procedures only (Group II). Objectives. To determine whether the addition of anterior Spinal fusion was beneficial in preventing progressive spinet deformity in the very young patient. Summary of Background Data. The crankshaft phenomenon had been well documented in young patients undergoing posterior fusion only. No previous study compared the results of a similar group of patients some of whom underwent combined anterior and posterior fusion and the others who underwent posterior fusion only. Methods. Patients who were Risser 0 and had open triradiate cartilages at surgery were evaluated for curve correction, correction loss, changes in rib vertebral angle differences, rotational changes, and spinal balance. Crankshaft was defined as a progression in curve magnitude greater than 10° and accompanied by an increase in rib vertebral angle difference greater than 10°. In Group I, age at surgery averaged 10.7 years, and follow-up averaged 37 months. In Group II, age at surgery averaged 11.0 years, and follow-up averaged 64 months. Results. Group I: Thoracic curve correction averaged 77% after surgery and 68% at follow-up. At follow-up, two patients had curves progress more than 10°, and three patients had an increase in rib vertebral angle difference of 10° or more, but none of the patients had these changes simultaneously. Group II: During the course of follow-up, five of the 12 patients had progressive changes of 10° or more in curve size and rip vertebral angle difference. Four other patients had an increase exceeding 10° in one of the two categories. Conclusions. In skeletally immature children (open triradiate cartilage and Risser 0) with idiopathic scoliosis, the addition of anterior spinal fusion to posterior instrumentation and fusion is helpful in preventing the crankshaft phenomenon.

AB - Study Design. Fourteen skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis (Group I) were retrospectively studied to determine if the crankshaft phenomenon was prevented by combining anterior spinal fusion with posterior instrumentation and fusion. They were compared with 12 similar patients who underwent posterior procedures only (Group II). Objectives. To determine whether the addition of anterior Spinal fusion was beneficial in preventing progressive spinet deformity in the very young patient. Summary of Background Data. The crankshaft phenomenon had been well documented in young patients undergoing posterior fusion only. No previous study compared the results of a similar group of patients some of whom underwent combined anterior and posterior fusion and the others who underwent posterior fusion only. Methods. Patients who were Risser 0 and had open triradiate cartilages at surgery were evaluated for curve correction, correction loss, changes in rib vertebral angle differences, rotational changes, and spinal balance. Crankshaft was defined as a progression in curve magnitude greater than 10° and accompanied by an increase in rib vertebral angle difference greater than 10°. In Group I, age at surgery averaged 10.7 years, and follow-up averaged 37 months. In Group II, age at surgery averaged 11.0 years, and follow-up averaged 64 months. Results. Group I: Thoracic curve correction averaged 77% after surgery and 68% at follow-up. At follow-up, two patients had curves progress more than 10°, and three patients had an increase in rib vertebral angle difference of 10° or more, but none of the patients had these changes simultaneously. Group II: During the course of follow-up, five of the 12 patients had progressive changes of 10° or more in curve size and rip vertebral angle difference. Four other patients had an increase exceeding 10° in one of the two categories. Conclusions. In skeletally immature children (open triradiate cartilage and Risser 0) with idiopathic scoliosis, the addition of anterior spinal fusion to posterior instrumentation and fusion is helpful in preventing the crankshaft phenomenon.

KW - anterior spinal fusion

KW - crankshaft phenomenon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029070049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029070049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7676338

AN - SCOPUS:0029070049

VL - 20

SP - 1392

EP - 1398

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 12

ER -