Privilege - a comparative study

M. F. Weiner, D. W. Shuman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In a questionnaire study, the authors compared psychiatrist-patient communications in the two states (South Carolina and West Virginia) that lack a privilege statute with psychiatrist-patient communications in the state of Texas, in which a privilege statute has been enacted. Although there were differences in the patient populations and in the nature of the psychiatrists' practices, there seemed to be little impact of privilege or lack of privilege on therapist-patient communication. A small percentage of patients in all three states would have sought treatment earlier had they known of the existence of privilege, but most patients relied more on their doctors' ethics than on statutory protection of their confidences. Patients who thought they were protected by privilege did not disclose more to their psychiatrist than patients who did not think they were so protected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-383
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Psychiatry and Law
Volume12
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

privilege
psychiatrist
Psychiatry
statute
Communication
communications
lack
therapist
confidence
moral philosophy
Ethics
questionnaire
communication
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Weiner, M. F., & Shuman, D. W. (1984). Privilege - a comparative study. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 12(3), 373-383.

Privilege - a comparative study. / Weiner, M. F.; Shuman, D. W.

In: Journal of Psychiatry and Law, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1984, p. 373-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weiner, MF & Shuman, DW 1984, 'Privilege - a comparative study', Journal of Psychiatry and Law, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 373-383.
Weiner MF, Shuman DW. Privilege - a comparative study. Journal of Psychiatry and Law. 1984;12(3):373-383.
Weiner, M. F. ; Shuman, D. W. / Privilege - a comparative study. In: Journal of Psychiatry and Law. 1984 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 373-383.
@article{ea4201a315134d00b24901f179c2652a,
title = "Privilege - a comparative study",
abstract = "In a questionnaire study, the authors compared psychiatrist-patient communications in the two states (South Carolina and West Virginia) that lack a privilege statute with psychiatrist-patient communications in the state of Texas, in which a privilege statute has been enacted. Although there were differences in the patient populations and in the nature of the psychiatrists' practices, there seemed to be little impact of privilege or lack of privilege on therapist-patient communication. A small percentage of patients in all three states would have sought treatment earlier had they known of the existence of privilege, but most patients relied more on their doctors' ethics than on statutory protection of their confidences. Patients who thought they were protected by privilege did not disclose more to their psychiatrist than patients who did not think they were so protected.",
author = "Weiner, {M. F.} and Shuman, {D. W.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "373--383",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatry and Law",
issn = "0093-1853",
publisher = "Federal Legal Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Privilege - a comparative study

AU - Weiner, M. F.

AU - Shuman, D. W.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - In a questionnaire study, the authors compared psychiatrist-patient communications in the two states (South Carolina and West Virginia) that lack a privilege statute with psychiatrist-patient communications in the state of Texas, in which a privilege statute has been enacted. Although there were differences in the patient populations and in the nature of the psychiatrists' practices, there seemed to be little impact of privilege or lack of privilege on therapist-patient communication. A small percentage of patients in all three states would have sought treatment earlier had they known of the existence of privilege, but most patients relied more on their doctors' ethics than on statutory protection of their confidences. Patients who thought they were protected by privilege did not disclose more to their psychiatrist than patients who did not think they were so protected.

AB - In a questionnaire study, the authors compared psychiatrist-patient communications in the two states (South Carolina and West Virginia) that lack a privilege statute with psychiatrist-patient communications in the state of Texas, in which a privilege statute has been enacted. Although there were differences in the patient populations and in the nature of the psychiatrists' practices, there seemed to be little impact of privilege or lack of privilege on therapist-patient communication. A small percentage of patients in all three states would have sought treatment earlier had they known of the existence of privilege, but most patients relied more on their doctors' ethics than on statutory protection of their confidences. Patients who thought they were protected by privilege did not disclose more to their psychiatrist than patients who did not think they were so protected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021566619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021566619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11658763

AN - SCOPUS:0021566619

VL - 12

SP - 373

EP - 383

JO - Journal of Psychiatry and Law

JF - Journal of Psychiatry and Law

SN - 0093-1853

IS - 3

ER -