Proactive and Retroactive Priming in Serial Target Detection

Ira H. Bernstein, Paul Havig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Four experiments were concerned with priming effects that occur when participants attempt to identify each letter in a briefly presented 4-letter display. At each position of the display, 1 alternative (the target) was more probable than 4 alternatives (nontargets). The basic finding, which held true over several manipulations of display characteristics, was that retroactive effects were generally much stronger than proactive effects. These strong retroactive effects contrast with prior findings that (a) proactive effects usually dominate and (b) repetition yields inhibition (repetition blindness). This asymmetry was also noted in an additional experiment in which participants responded to only 1 letter in the array.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1482-1495
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume22
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1996

Fingerprint

Blindness
Priming
Letters
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Proactive and Retroactive Priming in Serial Target Detection. / Bernstein, Ira H.; Havig, Paul.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 22, No. 6, 12.1996, p. 1482-1495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f50cf89a378a4e16a8f03f45f3085b04,
title = "Proactive and Retroactive Priming in Serial Target Detection",
abstract = "Four experiments were concerned with priming effects that occur when participants attempt to identify each letter in a briefly presented 4-letter display. At each position of the display, 1 alternative (the target) was more probable than 4 alternatives (nontargets). The basic finding, which held true over several manipulations of display characteristics, was that retroactive effects were generally much stronger than proactive effects. These strong retroactive effects contrast with prior findings that (a) proactive effects usually dominate and (b) repetition yields inhibition (repetition blindness). This asymmetry was also noted in an additional experiment in which participants responded to only 1 letter in the array.",
author = "Bernstein, {Ira H.} and Paul Havig",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1482--1495",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proactive and Retroactive Priming in Serial Target Detection

AU - Bernstein, Ira H.

AU - Havig, Paul

PY - 1996/12

Y1 - 1996/12

N2 - Four experiments were concerned with priming effects that occur when participants attempt to identify each letter in a briefly presented 4-letter display. At each position of the display, 1 alternative (the target) was more probable than 4 alternatives (nontargets). The basic finding, which held true over several manipulations of display characteristics, was that retroactive effects were generally much stronger than proactive effects. These strong retroactive effects contrast with prior findings that (a) proactive effects usually dominate and (b) repetition yields inhibition (repetition blindness). This asymmetry was also noted in an additional experiment in which participants responded to only 1 letter in the array.

AB - Four experiments were concerned with priming effects that occur when participants attempt to identify each letter in a briefly presented 4-letter display. At each position of the display, 1 alternative (the target) was more probable than 4 alternatives (nontargets). The basic finding, which held true over several manipulations of display characteristics, was that retroactive effects were generally much stronger than proactive effects. These strong retroactive effects contrast with prior findings that (a) proactive effects usually dominate and (b) repetition yields inhibition (repetition blindness). This asymmetry was also noted in an additional experiment in which participants responded to only 1 letter in the array.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030522833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030522833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030522833

VL - 22

SP - 1482

EP - 1495

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 6

ER -