Process evaluation of serial screening criteria to identify injured patients that benefit from brief intervention

practical implications.

Craig Field, Raul Caetano, Carla Pezzia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of serial screening methods for the identification of injured patients at risk for alcohol problems and are most likely to benefit from brief interventions. We hypothesize that blood alcohol concentration (BAC) alone is not sufficient to effectively identify at-risk drinkers in the trauma care setting. METHODS: During a 2-year period, patients admitted to an urban Level I trauma center for treatment of an injury were screened for alcohol problems. Screening consisted of four serial screening criteria: (1) clinical indication of acute intoxication including positive BAC; (2) self-reported drinking 6 hours before injury; (3) at-risk drinking as defined by National Institutes on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism or (4) by responding yes to one or more items on the CAGE within the last year. RESULTS: In all, 11,028 patients were seen. Fifty-eight percent were eligible for screening and 90% of eligible patients were screened. Of screened patients, 41% screened positive for an alcohol-related injury. Of patients that did not have a BAC drawn, 39% (n = 935) went on to screen positive using serial screening procedures. Additionally, 36% (n = 339) of patients with a negative BAC went on to screen positive using serial screening procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation clearly suggests that BAC alone is not sufficient to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from brief alcohol interventions. Self-reported drinking in conjunction with BAC facilitates identification and intervention of injured patients with alcohol problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1704-1711
Number of pages8
JournalThe Journal of trauma
Volume66
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Alcohols
Drinking
Wounds and Injuries
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.)
Trauma Centers
Blood Alcohol Content
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Process evaluation of serial screening criteria to identify injured patients that benefit from brief intervention : practical implications. / Field, Craig; Caetano, Raul; Pezzia, Carla.

In: The Journal of trauma, Vol. 66, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 1704-1711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{62b20bd4d4a34d63af695a56b5ca5fd2,
title = "Process evaluation of serial screening criteria to identify injured patients that benefit from brief intervention: practical implications.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of serial screening methods for the identification of injured patients at risk for alcohol problems and are most likely to benefit from brief interventions. We hypothesize that blood alcohol concentration (BAC) alone is not sufficient to effectively identify at-risk drinkers in the trauma care setting. METHODS: During a 2-year period, patients admitted to an urban Level I trauma center for treatment of an injury were screened for alcohol problems. Screening consisted of four serial screening criteria: (1) clinical indication of acute intoxication including positive BAC; (2) self-reported drinking 6 hours before injury; (3) at-risk drinking as defined by National Institutes on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism or (4) by responding yes to one or more items on the CAGE within the last year. RESULTS: In all, 11,028 patients were seen. Fifty-eight percent were eligible for screening and 90{\%} of eligible patients were screened. Of screened patients, 41{\%} screened positive for an alcohol-related injury. Of patients that did not have a BAC drawn, 39{\%} (n = 935) went on to screen positive using serial screening procedures. Additionally, 36{\%} (n = 339) of patients with a negative BAC went on to screen positive using serial screening procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation clearly suggests that BAC alone is not sufficient to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from brief alcohol interventions. Self-reported drinking in conjunction with BAC facilitates identification and intervention of injured patients with alcohol problems.",
author = "Craig Field and Raul Caetano and Carla Pezzia",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "1704--1711",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Process evaluation of serial screening criteria to identify injured patients that benefit from brief intervention

T2 - practical implications.

AU - Field, Craig

AU - Caetano, Raul

AU - Pezzia, Carla

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of serial screening methods for the identification of injured patients at risk for alcohol problems and are most likely to benefit from brief interventions. We hypothesize that blood alcohol concentration (BAC) alone is not sufficient to effectively identify at-risk drinkers in the trauma care setting. METHODS: During a 2-year period, patients admitted to an urban Level I trauma center for treatment of an injury were screened for alcohol problems. Screening consisted of four serial screening criteria: (1) clinical indication of acute intoxication including positive BAC; (2) self-reported drinking 6 hours before injury; (3) at-risk drinking as defined by National Institutes on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism or (4) by responding yes to one or more items on the CAGE within the last year. RESULTS: In all, 11,028 patients were seen. Fifty-eight percent were eligible for screening and 90% of eligible patients were screened. Of screened patients, 41% screened positive for an alcohol-related injury. Of patients that did not have a BAC drawn, 39% (n = 935) went on to screen positive using serial screening procedures. Additionally, 36% (n = 339) of patients with a negative BAC went on to screen positive using serial screening procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation clearly suggests that BAC alone is not sufficient to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from brief alcohol interventions. Self-reported drinking in conjunction with BAC facilitates identification and intervention of injured patients with alcohol problems.

AB - BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of serial screening methods for the identification of injured patients at risk for alcohol problems and are most likely to benefit from brief interventions. We hypothesize that blood alcohol concentration (BAC) alone is not sufficient to effectively identify at-risk drinkers in the trauma care setting. METHODS: During a 2-year period, patients admitted to an urban Level I trauma center for treatment of an injury were screened for alcohol problems. Screening consisted of four serial screening criteria: (1) clinical indication of acute intoxication including positive BAC; (2) self-reported drinking 6 hours before injury; (3) at-risk drinking as defined by National Institutes on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism or (4) by responding yes to one or more items on the CAGE within the last year. RESULTS: In all, 11,028 patients were seen. Fifty-eight percent were eligible for screening and 90% of eligible patients were screened. Of screened patients, 41% screened positive for an alcohol-related injury. Of patients that did not have a BAC drawn, 39% (n = 935) went on to screen positive using serial screening procedures. Additionally, 36% (n = 339) of patients with a negative BAC went on to screen positive using serial screening procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation clearly suggests that BAC alone is not sufficient to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from brief alcohol interventions. Self-reported drinking in conjunction with BAC facilitates identification and intervention of injured patients with alcohol problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649406265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649406265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 1704

EP - 1711

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 6

ER -