Proctor environment facilitates faculty training in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Matthew D. Mason, C. D Anthony Herndon, Katherine W. Herbst, Tyler L. Poston, Elizabeth J. Brandt, Craig A Peters, Sean T. Corbett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At our institution, faculty surgeons newly practicing robotic surgery are proctored by an expert surgeon for a minimum of three cases before operating independently. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of this proctor environment on the learning curve of faculty pediatric urologists training to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) pyeloplasty. We reviewed all pediatric RAL pyeloplasties performed at our institution between June 2006 and September 2012, comparing procedures performed by expert surgeon (E) and two training surgeons (both previously experienced laparoscopic surgeons). Training surgeons were proctored for at least three cases before able to operate on their own. Learning curve was quantified by benchmarking training surgeons’ post-proctored operative times to E’s mean operative time. One hundred and thirty-four RAL pyeloplasties were performed during the time period. Mean operative time was 3:31 h from start of cystoscopy to dressing placement. Both training surgeons achieved E’s mean operative time by their fourth case. The transition from laparoscopic pyeloplasty to RAL pyeloplasty for faculty surgeons in a proctor environment results in a more rapid achievement of benchmark levels than previously described for a new learner. The dual module da Vinci® Si surgical system may expedite this process further with the operative surgeon acting as a true “co-pilot”.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-369
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Robotics
Pediatrics
Operative Time
Benchmarking
Learning Curve
Surgeons
Cystoscopy
Bandages

Keywords

  • Learning curve
  • Minimally invasive
  • Pediatric
  • Pyeloplasty
  • Robotic
  • UPJ obstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Proctor environment facilitates faculty training in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. / Mason, Matthew D.; Herndon, C. D Anthony; Herbst, Katherine W.; Poston, Tyler L.; Brandt, Elizabeth J.; Peters, Craig A; Corbett, Sean T.

In: Journal of Robotic Surgery, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 365-369.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mason, Matthew D. ; Herndon, C. D Anthony ; Herbst, Katherine W. ; Poston, Tyler L. ; Brandt, Elizabeth J. ; Peters, Craig A ; Corbett, Sean T. / Proctor environment facilitates faculty training in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In: Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 365-369.
@article{6dbde8b538134a9bb325968a2fc30618,
title = "Proctor environment facilitates faculty training in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty",
abstract = "At our institution, faculty surgeons newly practicing robotic surgery are proctored by an expert surgeon for a minimum of three cases before operating independently. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of this proctor environment on the learning curve of faculty pediatric urologists training to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) pyeloplasty. We reviewed all pediatric RAL pyeloplasties performed at our institution between June 2006 and September 2012, comparing procedures performed by expert surgeon (E) and two training surgeons (both previously experienced laparoscopic surgeons). Training surgeons were proctored for at least three cases before able to operate on their own. Learning curve was quantified by benchmarking training surgeons’ post-proctored operative times to E’s mean operative time. One hundred and thirty-four RAL pyeloplasties were performed during the time period. Mean operative time was 3:31 h from start of cystoscopy to dressing placement. Both training surgeons achieved E’s mean operative time by their fourth case. The transition from laparoscopic pyeloplasty to RAL pyeloplasty for faculty surgeons in a proctor environment results in a more rapid achievement of benchmark levels than previously described for a new learner. The dual module da Vinci{\circledR} Si surgical system may expedite this process further with the operative surgeon acting as a true “co-pilot”.",
keywords = "Learning curve, Minimally invasive, Pediatric, Pyeloplasty, Robotic, UPJ obstruction",
author = "Mason, {Matthew D.} and Herndon, {C. D Anthony} and Herbst, {Katherine W.} and Poston, {Tyler L.} and Brandt, {Elizabeth J.} and Peters, {Craig A} and Corbett, {Sean T.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11701-014-0481-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "365--369",
journal = "Journal of Robotic Surgery",
issn = "1863-2483",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proctor environment facilitates faculty training in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty

AU - Mason, Matthew D.

AU - Herndon, C. D Anthony

AU - Herbst, Katherine W.

AU - Poston, Tyler L.

AU - Brandt, Elizabeth J.

AU - Peters, Craig A

AU - Corbett, Sean T.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - At our institution, faculty surgeons newly practicing robotic surgery are proctored by an expert surgeon for a minimum of three cases before operating independently. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of this proctor environment on the learning curve of faculty pediatric urologists training to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) pyeloplasty. We reviewed all pediatric RAL pyeloplasties performed at our institution between June 2006 and September 2012, comparing procedures performed by expert surgeon (E) and two training surgeons (both previously experienced laparoscopic surgeons). Training surgeons were proctored for at least three cases before able to operate on their own. Learning curve was quantified by benchmarking training surgeons’ post-proctored operative times to E’s mean operative time. One hundred and thirty-four RAL pyeloplasties were performed during the time period. Mean operative time was 3:31 h from start of cystoscopy to dressing placement. Both training surgeons achieved E’s mean operative time by their fourth case. The transition from laparoscopic pyeloplasty to RAL pyeloplasty for faculty surgeons in a proctor environment results in a more rapid achievement of benchmark levels than previously described for a new learner. The dual module da Vinci® Si surgical system may expedite this process further with the operative surgeon acting as a true “co-pilot”.

AB - At our institution, faculty surgeons newly practicing robotic surgery are proctored by an expert surgeon for a minimum of three cases before operating independently. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of this proctor environment on the learning curve of faculty pediatric urologists training to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) pyeloplasty. We reviewed all pediatric RAL pyeloplasties performed at our institution between June 2006 and September 2012, comparing procedures performed by expert surgeon (E) and two training surgeons (both previously experienced laparoscopic surgeons). Training surgeons were proctored for at least three cases before able to operate on their own. Learning curve was quantified by benchmarking training surgeons’ post-proctored operative times to E’s mean operative time. One hundred and thirty-four RAL pyeloplasties were performed during the time period. Mean operative time was 3:31 h from start of cystoscopy to dressing placement. Both training surgeons achieved E’s mean operative time by their fourth case. The transition from laparoscopic pyeloplasty to RAL pyeloplasty for faculty surgeons in a proctor environment results in a more rapid achievement of benchmark levels than previously described for a new learner. The dual module da Vinci® Si surgical system may expedite this process further with the operative surgeon acting as a true “co-pilot”.

KW - Learning curve

KW - Minimally invasive

KW - Pediatric

KW - Pyeloplasty

KW - Robotic

KW - UPJ obstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911955850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911955850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11701-014-0481-0

DO - 10.1007/s11701-014-0481-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84911955850

VL - 8

SP - 365

EP - 369

JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery

JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery

SN - 1863-2483

IS - 4

ER -