Professionally responsible intrapartum management of patients with major mental disorders

Kriste E. Babbitt, Kala J. Bailey, John H. Coverdale, Frank A. Chervenak, Laurence B. McCullough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pregnant women with major mental disorders present obstetricians with a range of clinical challenges, which are magnified when a psychotic or agitated patient presents in labor and there is limited time for decision making. This article provides the obstetrician with an algorithm to guide professionally responsible decision making with these patients. We searched for articles related to the intrapartum management of pregnant patients with major mental disorders, using 3 main search components: pregnancy, chronic mental illness, and ethics. No articles were found that addressed the clinical ethical challenges of decision making during the intrapartum period with these patients. We therefore developed an ethical framework with 4 components: the concept of the fetus as a patient; the presumption of decision-making capacity; the concept of assent; and beneficence-based clinical judgment. On the basis of this framework we propose an algorithm to guide professionally responsible decision making that asks 5 questions: (1) Does the patient have the capacity to consent to treatment?; (2) Is there time to attempt restoration of capacity?; (3) Is there an opportunity for substituted judgment?; (4) Is the patient accepting treatment?; (5) Is there an opportunity for active assent?; and (6) coerced clinical management as the least worst alternative. The algorithm is designed to support a deliberative, clinically comprehensive, preventive-ethics approach to guide obstetricians in decision making with this challenging population of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-31
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume210
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Mental Disorders
Decision Making
Ethics
Beneficence
Pregnant Women
Fetus
Chronic Disease
Pregnancy
Therapeutics
Population

Keywords

  • decision making
  • ethics
  • intrapartum management
  • psychosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Professionally responsible intrapartum management of patients with major mental disorders. / Babbitt, Kriste E.; Bailey, Kala J.; Coverdale, John H.; Chervenak, Frank A.; McCullough, Laurence B.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 210, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 27-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Babbitt, Kriste E. ; Bailey, Kala J. ; Coverdale, John H. ; Chervenak, Frank A. ; McCullough, Laurence B. / Professionally responsible intrapartum management of patients with major mental disorders. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014 ; Vol. 210, No. 1. pp. 27-31.
@article{0b86a25529d241f0b4de4ff689643948,
title = "Professionally responsible intrapartum management of patients with major mental disorders",
abstract = "Pregnant women with major mental disorders present obstetricians with a range of clinical challenges, which are magnified when a psychotic or agitated patient presents in labor and there is limited time for decision making. This article provides the obstetrician with an algorithm to guide professionally responsible decision making with these patients. We searched for articles related to the intrapartum management of pregnant patients with major mental disorders, using 3 main search components: pregnancy, chronic mental illness, and ethics. No articles were found that addressed the clinical ethical challenges of decision making during the intrapartum period with these patients. We therefore developed an ethical framework with 4 components: the concept of the fetus as a patient; the presumption of decision-making capacity; the concept of assent; and beneficence-based clinical judgment. On the basis of this framework we propose an algorithm to guide professionally responsible decision making that asks 5 questions: (1) Does the patient have the capacity to consent to treatment?; (2) Is there time to attempt restoration of capacity?; (3) Is there an opportunity for substituted judgment?; (4) Is the patient accepting treatment?; (5) Is there an opportunity for active assent?; and (6) coerced clinical management as the least worst alternative. The algorithm is designed to support a deliberative, clinically comprehensive, preventive-ethics approach to guide obstetricians in decision making with this challenging population of patients.",
keywords = "decision making, ethics, intrapartum management, psychosis",
author = "Babbitt, {Kriste E.} and Bailey, {Kala J.} and Coverdale, {John H.} and Chervenak, {Frank A.} and McCullough, {Laurence B.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "210",
pages = "27--31",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professionally responsible intrapartum management of patients with major mental disorders

AU - Babbitt, Kriste E.

AU - Bailey, Kala J.

AU - Coverdale, John H.

AU - Chervenak, Frank A.

AU - McCullough, Laurence B.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Pregnant women with major mental disorders present obstetricians with a range of clinical challenges, which are magnified when a psychotic or agitated patient presents in labor and there is limited time for decision making. This article provides the obstetrician with an algorithm to guide professionally responsible decision making with these patients. We searched for articles related to the intrapartum management of pregnant patients with major mental disorders, using 3 main search components: pregnancy, chronic mental illness, and ethics. No articles were found that addressed the clinical ethical challenges of decision making during the intrapartum period with these patients. We therefore developed an ethical framework with 4 components: the concept of the fetus as a patient; the presumption of decision-making capacity; the concept of assent; and beneficence-based clinical judgment. On the basis of this framework we propose an algorithm to guide professionally responsible decision making that asks 5 questions: (1) Does the patient have the capacity to consent to treatment?; (2) Is there time to attempt restoration of capacity?; (3) Is there an opportunity for substituted judgment?; (4) Is the patient accepting treatment?; (5) Is there an opportunity for active assent?; and (6) coerced clinical management as the least worst alternative. The algorithm is designed to support a deliberative, clinically comprehensive, preventive-ethics approach to guide obstetricians in decision making with this challenging population of patients.

AB - Pregnant women with major mental disorders present obstetricians with a range of clinical challenges, which are magnified when a psychotic or agitated patient presents in labor and there is limited time for decision making. This article provides the obstetrician with an algorithm to guide professionally responsible decision making with these patients. We searched for articles related to the intrapartum management of pregnant patients with major mental disorders, using 3 main search components: pregnancy, chronic mental illness, and ethics. No articles were found that addressed the clinical ethical challenges of decision making during the intrapartum period with these patients. We therefore developed an ethical framework with 4 components: the concept of the fetus as a patient; the presumption of decision-making capacity; the concept of assent; and beneficence-based clinical judgment. On the basis of this framework we propose an algorithm to guide professionally responsible decision making that asks 5 questions: (1) Does the patient have the capacity to consent to treatment?; (2) Is there time to attempt restoration of capacity?; (3) Is there an opportunity for substituted judgment?; (4) Is the patient accepting treatment?; (5) Is there an opportunity for active assent?; and (6) coerced clinical management as the least worst alternative. The algorithm is designed to support a deliberative, clinically comprehensive, preventive-ethics approach to guide obstetricians in decision making with this challenging population of patients.

KW - decision making

KW - ethics

KW - intrapartum management

KW - psychosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890856720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890856720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.024

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 23791565

AN - SCOPUS:84890856720

VL - 210

SP - 27

EP - 31

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 1

ER -