Progressive entrustment to achieve resident autonomy in the operating room

A national qualitative study with general surgery faculty and residents

Gurjit Sandhu, Christopher P. Magas, Adina B. Robinson, Christopher P. Scally, Rebecca M. Minter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify behaviors that faculty and residents exhibit during intraoperative interactions, which support or inhibit progressive entrustment leading to operative autonomy. Background: In the operating room, a critical balance is sought between direct faculty supervision and appropriate increase in resident autonomy with indirect faculty supervision. Little is known regarding perspectives of faculty and residents about how attendings increasingly step back and safely delegate autonomy to trainees. Understanding the context in which these decisions are made is critical to achieving a safe strategy for imparting progressive responsibility. Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken from January 2014 to February 2015. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 37 faculty and 59 residents from 14 and 41 institutions, respectively. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling from general surgery residency programs across the United States to represent a range of university, university-affiliated, and community programs, and geographic regions. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed, iteratively analyzed, and emergent themes identified. Results: Six themes were identified as influencing progressive entrustment in the operating room: optimizing faculty intraoperative feedback; policies and regulations affecting role of resident in the operating room; flexible faculty teaching strategies; context-specific variables; leadership opportunities for resident in the case; and safe struggle for resident when appropriate. Conclusions: Perspectives of faculty and residents while overlapping were different in emphasis. Better understanding faculty-resident interactions, individual behaviors, contextual influences, and national regulations that influence intraoperative education have the potential to significantly affect progressive entrustment in training paradigms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1134-1140
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume265
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
Interviews
Internship and Residency
Teaching
Education

Keywords

  • Autonomy
  • Entrustment
  • Intraoperative teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Progressive entrustment to achieve resident autonomy in the operating room : A national qualitative study with general surgery faculty and residents. / Sandhu, Gurjit; Magas, Christopher P.; Robinson, Adina B.; Scally, Christopher P.; Minter, Rebecca M.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 265, No. 6, 01.06.2017, p. 1134-1140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sandhu, Gurjit ; Magas, Christopher P. ; Robinson, Adina B. ; Scally, Christopher P. ; Minter, Rebecca M. / Progressive entrustment to achieve resident autonomy in the operating room : A national qualitative study with general surgery faculty and residents. In: Annals of Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 265, No. 6. pp. 1134-1140.
@article{256c9c937727422d8ab51ef2d12285f6,
title = "Progressive entrustment to achieve resident autonomy in the operating room: A national qualitative study with general surgery faculty and residents",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify behaviors that faculty and residents exhibit during intraoperative interactions, which support or inhibit progressive entrustment leading to operative autonomy. Background: In the operating room, a critical balance is sought between direct faculty supervision and appropriate increase in resident autonomy with indirect faculty supervision. Little is known regarding perspectives of faculty and residents about how attendings increasingly step back and safely delegate autonomy to trainees. Understanding the context in which these decisions are made is critical to achieving a safe strategy for imparting progressive responsibility. Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken from January 2014 to February 2015. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 37 faculty and 59 residents from 14 and 41 institutions, respectively. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling from general surgery residency programs across the United States to represent a range of university, university-affiliated, and community programs, and geographic regions. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed, iteratively analyzed, and emergent themes identified. Results: Six themes were identified as influencing progressive entrustment in the operating room: optimizing faculty intraoperative feedback; policies and regulations affecting role of resident in the operating room; flexible faculty teaching strategies; context-specific variables; leadership opportunities for resident in the case; and safe struggle for resident when appropriate. Conclusions: Perspectives of faculty and residents while overlapping were different in emphasis. Better understanding faculty-resident interactions, individual behaviors, contextual influences, and national regulations that influence intraoperative education have the potential to significantly affect progressive entrustment in training paradigms.",
keywords = "Autonomy, Entrustment, Intraoperative teaching",
author = "Gurjit Sandhu and Magas, {Christopher P.} and Robinson, {Adina B.} and Scally, {Christopher P.} and Minter, {Rebecca M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000001782",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "265",
pages = "1134--1140",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Progressive entrustment to achieve resident autonomy in the operating room

T2 - A national qualitative study with general surgery faculty and residents

AU - Sandhu, Gurjit

AU - Magas, Christopher P.

AU - Robinson, Adina B.

AU - Scally, Christopher P.

AU - Minter, Rebecca M.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify behaviors that faculty and residents exhibit during intraoperative interactions, which support or inhibit progressive entrustment leading to operative autonomy. Background: In the operating room, a critical balance is sought between direct faculty supervision and appropriate increase in resident autonomy with indirect faculty supervision. Little is known regarding perspectives of faculty and residents about how attendings increasingly step back and safely delegate autonomy to trainees. Understanding the context in which these decisions are made is critical to achieving a safe strategy for imparting progressive responsibility. Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken from January 2014 to February 2015. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 37 faculty and 59 residents from 14 and 41 institutions, respectively. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling from general surgery residency programs across the United States to represent a range of university, university-affiliated, and community programs, and geographic regions. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed, iteratively analyzed, and emergent themes identified. Results: Six themes were identified as influencing progressive entrustment in the operating room: optimizing faculty intraoperative feedback; policies and regulations affecting role of resident in the operating room; flexible faculty teaching strategies; context-specific variables; leadership opportunities for resident in the case; and safe struggle for resident when appropriate. Conclusions: Perspectives of faculty and residents while overlapping were different in emphasis. Better understanding faculty-resident interactions, individual behaviors, contextual influences, and national regulations that influence intraoperative education have the potential to significantly affect progressive entrustment in training paradigms.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify behaviors that faculty and residents exhibit during intraoperative interactions, which support or inhibit progressive entrustment leading to operative autonomy. Background: In the operating room, a critical balance is sought between direct faculty supervision and appropriate increase in resident autonomy with indirect faculty supervision. Little is known regarding perspectives of faculty and residents about how attendings increasingly step back and safely delegate autonomy to trainees. Understanding the context in which these decisions are made is critical to achieving a safe strategy for imparting progressive responsibility. Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken from January 2014 to February 2015. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 37 faculty and 59 residents from 14 and 41 institutions, respectively. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling from general surgery residency programs across the United States to represent a range of university, university-affiliated, and community programs, and geographic regions. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed, iteratively analyzed, and emergent themes identified. Results: Six themes were identified as influencing progressive entrustment in the operating room: optimizing faculty intraoperative feedback; policies and regulations affecting role of resident in the operating room; flexible faculty teaching strategies; context-specific variables; leadership opportunities for resident in the case; and safe struggle for resident when appropriate. Conclusions: Perspectives of faculty and residents while overlapping were different in emphasis. Better understanding faculty-resident interactions, individual behaviors, contextual influences, and national regulations that influence intraoperative education have the potential to significantly affect progressive entrustment in training paradigms.

KW - Autonomy

KW - Entrustment

KW - Intraoperative teaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966344898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966344898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001782

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001782

M3 - Article

VL - 265

SP - 1134

EP - 1140

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 6

ER -