Promise of wearable physical activity monitors in oncology practice

Muhammad S. Beg, Arjun Gupta, Tyler Stewart, Chad D. Rethorst

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Commercially available physical activity monitors provide clinicians an opportunity to obtain oncology patient health measures to an unprecedented degree. These devices can provide objective and quantifiable measures of physical activity, which are not subject to errors or bias of self-reporting or shorter duration of formal testing. Priorworkonso-called quantified-self datawasbasedonolder-generation, research-grade accelerometers, which laid the foundation for consumer-based physical activity monitoring devices to be validated as a feasible and reliable tool in patients with cancer. Physical activity monitors are being used in chronic conditions including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Differing demographics, compounded with higher symptom and treatment burdens in patients with cancer, imply that additional work is needed to understand the unique strengths and weaknesses of physical activity monitors in this population. Oncology programs can systematically implement these tools into their workflows in an adaptable and iterative manner. Translating large amounts of data collected from an individual physical activity monitoring device into clinically relevant information requires sophisticated data compilation and reduction. In this article,wesummarize the characteristics of older-And newer-generation physical activity monitors, review the validation of physical activity monitors with respect to health-related quality-of-life assessments, and describe the current role of these devices for the practicing oncologist. We also highlight the challenges and next steps needed for physical activity monitors to provide relevant information that can change the current state of oncology practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)82-89
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Oncology Practice
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Exercise
Equipment and Supplies
Workflow
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Neoplasms
Diabetes Mellitus
Heart Failure
Obesity
Quality of Life
Demography
Health
Research
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Promise of wearable physical activity monitors in oncology practice. / Beg, Muhammad S.; Gupta, Arjun; Stewart, Tyler; Rethorst, Chad D.

In: Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 82-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{d00db9500a3a4ee3bc6d30fe0771fa61,
title = "Promise of wearable physical activity monitors in oncology practice",
abstract = "Commercially available physical activity monitors provide clinicians an opportunity to obtain oncology patient health measures to an unprecedented degree. These devices can provide objective and quantifiable measures of physical activity, which are not subject to errors or bias of self-reporting or shorter duration of formal testing. Priorworkonso-called quantified-self datawasbasedonolder-generation, research-grade accelerometers, which laid the foundation for consumer-based physical activity monitoring devices to be validated as a feasible and reliable tool in patients with cancer. Physical activity monitors are being used in chronic conditions including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Differing demographics, compounded with higher symptom and treatment burdens in patients with cancer, imply that additional work is needed to understand the unique strengths and weaknesses of physical activity monitors in this population. Oncology programs can systematically implement these tools into their workflows in an adaptable and iterative manner. Translating large amounts of data collected from an individual physical activity monitoring device into clinically relevant information requires sophisticated data compilation and reduction. In this article,wesummarize the characteristics of older-And newer-generation physical activity monitors, review the validation of physical activity monitors with respect to health-related quality-of-life assessments, and describe the current role of these devices for the practicing oncologist. We also highlight the challenges and next steps needed for physical activity monitors to provide relevant information that can change the current state of oncology practice.",
author = "Beg, {Muhammad S.} and Arjun Gupta and Tyler Stewart and Rethorst, {Chad D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1200/JOP.2016.016857",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "82--89",
journal = "Journal of Oncology Practice",
issn = "1554-7477",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promise of wearable physical activity monitors in oncology practice

AU - Beg, Muhammad S.

AU - Gupta, Arjun

AU - Stewart, Tyler

AU - Rethorst, Chad D.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Commercially available physical activity monitors provide clinicians an opportunity to obtain oncology patient health measures to an unprecedented degree. These devices can provide objective and quantifiable measures of physical activity, which are not subject to errors or bias of self-reporting or shorter duration of formal testing. Priorworkonso-called quantified-self datawasbasedonolder-generation, research-grade accelerometers, which laid the foundation for consumer-based physical activity monitoring devices to be validated as a feasible and reliable tool in patients with cancer. Physical activity monitors are being used in chronic conditions including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Differing demographics, compounded with higher symptom and treatment burdens in patients with cancer, imply that additional work is needed to understand the unique strengths and weaknesses of physical activity monitors in this population. Oncology programs can systematically implement these tools into their workflows in an adaptable and iterative manner. Translating large amounts of data collected from an individual physical activity monitoring device into clinically relevant information requires sophisticated data compilation and reduction. In this article,wesummarize the characteristics of older-And newer-generation physical activity monitors, review the validation of physical activity monitors with respect to health-related quality-of-life assessments, and describe the current role of these devices for the practicing oncologist. We also highlight the challenges and next steps needed for physical activity monitors to provide relevant information that can change the current state of oncology practice.

AB - Commercially available physical activity monitors provide clinicians an opportunity to obtain oncology patient health measures to an unprecedented degree. These devices can provide objective and quantifiable measures of physical activity, which are not subject to errors or bias of self-reporting or shorter duration of formal testing. Priorworkonso-called quantified-self datawasbasedonolder-generation, research-grade accelerometers, which laid the foundation for consumer-based physical activity monitoring devices to be validated as a feasible and reliable tool in patients with cancer. Physical activity monitors are being used in chronic conditions including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Differing demographics, compounded with higher symptom and treatment burdens in patients with cancer, imply that additional work is needed to understand the unique strengths and weaknesses of physical activity monitors in this population. Oncology programs can systematically implement these tools into their workflows in an adaptable and iterative manner. Translating large amounts of data collected from an individual physical activity monitoring device into clinically relevant information requires sophisticated data compilation and reduction. In this article,wesummarize the characteristics of older-And newer-generation physical activity monitors, review the validation of physical activity monitors with respect to health-related quality-of-life assessments, and describe the current role of these devices for the practicing oncologist. We also highlight the challenges and next steps needed for physical activity monitors to provide relevant information that can change the current state of oncology practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016751425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016751425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JOP.2016.016857

DO - 10.1200/JOP.2016.016857

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

SP - 82

EP - 89

JO - Journal of Oncology Practice

JF - Journal of Oncology Practice

SN - 1554-7477

IS - 2

ER -