Proposal for a new clinical end point to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and devices in the treatment of chronic heart failure

M. Packer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

299 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clinical trials designed to evaluate the effect of drugs and devices on the symptoms and clinical status in chronic heart failure have frequently produced conflicting, inconclusive, or misleading results. These difficulties can be explained by the fact that previous studies have relied on efficacy measures that have inherent limitations and have been analyzed using statistical approaches that ignored episodes of clinical deterioration. Recognition of these pitfalls has led to the development of a new clinical composite score, which combines changes in the New York Heart Association class and the global assessment together with the information provided from the occurrence of major clinical events. Use of this score would have correctly distinguished active therapy from placebo in earlier trials and thus would have avoided some of their misleading conclusions. The new clinical composite score has been prospectively incorporated into the design of studies evaluating the efficacy of endothelin antagonists, cytokine antagonists, vasopressin antagonists, and cardiac resynchronization in the treatment of chronic heart failure. In the trials that have been completed to date, the clinical composite score has been more sensitive than conventional approaches in discerning the presence or absence of a true treatment effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)176-182
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cardiac Failure
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Devices
  • Drugs
  • End points

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Proposal for a new clinical end point to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and devices in the treatment of chronic heart failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this