Provocative induction of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Noninferiority of an induction technique without versus with placebo

David K. Chen, Hina Dave, Kareem Gadelmola, Myrtle Jeroudi, Melissa Fadipe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We aim to demonstrate, in a sufficiently powered and standardized study, that the success rate of inducing psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) without placebo (saline infusion) is noninferior to induction with placebo. The clinical data of 170 consecutive patients with suspected PNES who underwent induction with placebo from January 21, 2009 to March 31, 2013 were pair-matched with 170 consecutive patients with suspected PNES who underwent the same induction technique but without addition of placebo from April 1, 2013 to February 7, 2018 at the same center. The success rates of induction were 79.4% (135/170) without placebo and 73.5% (125/170) with placebo. The difference of these two proportions was 5.9%, with two-sided 95% confidence interval ranging from −3.6% to 15.2%, indicating a non–statistically significant difference. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (−3.6%) was above the noninferiority margin (δ = −5%), hence inferring noninferiority of induction without versus with placebo. The greater cumulative induction experiences of the clinician performer (influencing the manner/presentation of induction) may supplant the potential advantage from addition of placebo (the means utilized). Among experienced performers, provocative induction without placebo should be the preferred diagnostic approach, given more ethically acceptable transparency and the noninferior success rate when compared to the same induction technique with placebo.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e161-e165
JournalEpilepsia
Volume59
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Seizures
Placebos
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • induction
  • placebo
  • psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Provocative induction of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures : Noninferiority of an induction technique without versus with placebo. / Chen, David K.; Dave, Hina; Gadelmola, Kareem; Jeroudi, Myrtle; Fadipe, Melissa.

In: Epilepsia, Vol. 59, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. e161-e165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, David K. ; Dave, Hina ; Gadelmola, Kareem ; Jeroudi, Myrtle ; Fadipe, Melissa. / Provocative induction of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures : Noninferiority of an induction technique without versus with placebo. In: Epilepsia. 2018 ; Vol. 59, No. 11. pp. e161-e165.
@article{3434ad86b1bf4599b8c4b5ce7fd3be34,
title = "Provocative induction of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Noninferiority of an induction technique without versus with placebo",
abstract = "We aim to demonstrate, in a sufficiently powered and standardized study, that the success rate of inducing psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) without placebo (saline infusion) is noninferior to induction with placebo. The clinical data of 170 consecutive patients with suspected PNES who underwent induction with placebo from January 21, 2009 to March 31, 2013 were pair-matched with 170 consecutive patients with suspected PNES who underwent the same induction technique but without addition of placebo from April 1, 2013 to February 7, 2018 at the same center. The success rates of induction were 79.4{\%} (135/170) without placebo and 73.5{\%} (125/170) with placebo. The difference of these two proportions was 5.9{\%}, with two-sided 95{\%} confidence interval ranging from −3.6{\%} to 15.2{\%}, indicating a non–statistically significant difference. The lower bound of the 95{\%} confidence interval (−3.6{\%}) was above the noninferiority margin (δ = −5{\%}), hence inferring noninferiority of induction without versus with placebo. The greater cumulative induction experiences of the clinician performer (influencing the manner/presentation of induction) may supplant the potential advantage from addition of placebo (the means utilized). Among experienced performers, provocative induction without placebo should be the preferred diagnostic approach, given more ethically acceptable transparency and the noninferior success rate when compared to the same induction technique with placebo.",
keywords = "induction, placebo, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures",
author = "Chen, {David K.} and Hina Dave and Kareem Gadelmola and Myrtle Jeroudi and Melissa Fadipe",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/epi.14570",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "e161--e165",
journal = "Epilepsia",
issn = "0013-9580",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Provocative induction of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

T2 - Noninferiority of an induction technique without versus with placebo

AU - Chen, David K.

AU - Dave, Hina

AU - Gadelmola, Kareem

AU - Jeroudi, Myrtle

AU - Fadipe, Melissa

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - We aim to demonstrate, in a sufficiently powered and standardized study, that the success rate of inducing psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) without placebo (saline infusion) is noninferior to induction with placebo. The clinical data of 170 consecutive patients with suspected PNES who underwent induction with placebo from January 21, 2009 to March 31, 2013 were pair-matched with 170 consecutive patients with suspected PNES who underwent the same induction technique but without addition of placebo from April 1, 2013 to February 7, 2018 at the same center. The success rates of induction were 79.4% (135/170) without placebo and 73.5% (125/170) with placebo. The difference of these two proportions was 5.9%, with two-sided 95% confidence interval ranging from −3.6% to 15.2%, indicating a non–statistically significant difference. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (−3.6%) was above the noninferiority margin (δ = −5%), hence inferring noninferiority of induction without versus with placebo. The greater cumulative induction experiences of the clinician performer (influencing the manner/presentation of induction) may supplant the potential advantage from addition of placebo (the means utilized). Among experienced performers, provocative induction without placebo should be the preferred diagnostic approach, given more ethically acceptable transparency and the noninferior success rate when compared to the same induction technique with placebo.

AB - We aim to demonstrate, in a sufficiently powered and standardized study, that the success rate of inducing psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) without placebo (saline infusion) is noninferior to induction with placebo. The clinical data of 170 consecutive patients with suspected PNES who underwent induction with placebo from January 21, 2009 to March 31, 2013 were pair-matched with 170 consecutive patients with suspected PNES who underwent the same induction technique but without addition of placebo from April 1, 2013 to February 7, 2018 at the same center. The success rates of induction were 79.4% (135/170) without placebo and 73.5% (125/170) with placebo. The difference of these two proportions was 5.9%, with two-sided 95% confidence interval ranging from −3.6% to 15.2%, indicating a non–statistically significant difference. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (−3.6%) was above the noninferiority margin (δ = −5%), hence inferring noninferiority of induction without versus with placebo. The greater cumulative induction experiences of the clinician performer (influencing the manner/presentation of induction) may supplant the potential advantage from addition of placebo (the means utilized). Among experienced performers, provocative induction without placebo should be the preferred diagnostic approach, given more ethically acceptable transparency and the noninferior success rate when compared to the same induction technique with placebo.

KW - induction

KW - placebo

KW - psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054197743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054197743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/epi.14570

DO - 10.1111/epi.14570

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - e161-e165

JO - Epilepsia

JF - Epilepsia

SN - 0013-9580

IS - 11

ER -