Pseudomeningocele and percutaneous intrathecal lead placement complication for spinal cord stimulator

Achal Patel, Ben Kafka, Mazin Al Tamimi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The incidence of symptomatic percutaneous intrathecal subarachnoid lead placement for spinal cord stimulator is almost an unheard of complication in the literature. We present the first case of a spinal cord stimulator implant with a complication of symptomatic intrathecal subarachnoid lead placement with a pseudomeningocele. This complication was found with myelogram and addressed by replacement with a new spinal cord stimulator implant with paddle leads instead of percutaneous leads and obliterating the pseudomeningocele tract. Technique for epidural lead placement is discussed. This case illustrates a spinal cord stimulator implant complication of intrathecal percutaneous lead placement with pseudomeningocele and its recognition and treatment involving replacement of the system while minimizing risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Intraoperative neuromonitoring and interrogation of the spinal cord stimulator system during implantation are effective tools for accurate epidural lead placement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord
Lead
Incidence

Keywords

  • Complication
  • Intrathecal
  • Neuromonitoring
  • Spinal cord
  • Stimulator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

@article{a87e4133d9a847f683c3614b7530599c,
title = "Pseudomeningocele and percutaneous intrathecal lead placement complication for spinal cord stimulator",
abstract = "The incidence of symptomatic percutaneous intrathecal subarachnoid lead placement for spinal cord stimulator is almost an unheard of complication in the literature. We present the first case of a spinal cord stimulator implant with a complication of symptomatic intrathecal subarachnoid lead placement with a pseudomeningocele. This complication was found with myelogram and addressed by replacement with a new spinal cord stimulator implant with paddle leads instead of percutaneous leads and obliterating the pseudomeningocele tract. Technique for epidural lead placement is discussed. This case illustrates a spinal cord stimulator implant complication of intrathecal percutaneous lead placement with pseudomeningocele and its recognition and treatment involving replacement of the system while minimizing risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Intraoperative neuromonitoring and interrogation of the spinal cord stimulator system during implantation are effective tools for accurate epidural lead placement.",
keywords = "Complication, Intrathecal, Neuromonitoring, Spinal cord, Stimulator",
author = "Achal Patel and Ben Kafka and {Al Tamimi}, Mazin",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.045",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
issn = "0967-5868",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pseudomeningocele and percutaneous intrathecal lead placement complication for spinal cord stimulator

AU - Patel, Achal

AU - Kafka, Ben

AU - Al Tamimi, Mazin

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The incidence of symptomatic percutaneous intrathecal subarachnoid lead placement for spinal cord stimulator is almost an unheard of complication in the literature. We present the first case of a spinal cord stimulator implant with a complication of symptomatic intrathecal subarachnoid lead placement with a pseudomeningocele. This complication was found with myelogram and addressed by replacement with a new spinal cord stimulator implant with paddle leads instead of percutaneous leads and obliterating the pseudomeningocele tract. Technique for epidural lead placement is discussed. This case illustrates a spinal cord stimulator implant complication of intrathecal percutaneous lead placement with pseudomeningocele and its recognition and treatment involving replacement of the system while minimizing risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Intraoperative neuromonitoring and interrogation of the spinal cord stimulator system during implantation are effective tools for accurate epidural lead placement.

AB - The incidence of symptomatic percutaneous intrathecal subarachnoid lead placement for spinal cord stimulator is almost an unheard of complication in the literature. We present the first case of a spinal cord stimulator implant with a complication of symptomatic intrathecal subarachnoid lead placement with a pseudomeningocele. This complication was found with myelogram and addressed by replacement with a new spinal cord stimulator implant with paddle leads instead of percutaneous leads and obliterating the pseudomeningocele tract. Technique for epidural lead placement is discussed. This case illustrates a spinal cord stimulator implant complication of intrathecal percutaneous lead placement with pseudomeningocele and its recognition and treatment involving replacement of the system while minimizing risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Intraoperative neuromonitoring and interrogation of the spinal cord stimulator system during implantation are effective tools for accurate epidural lead placement.

KW - Complication

KW - Intrathecal

KW - Neuromonitoring

KW - Spinal cord

KW - Stimulator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057038872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057038872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.045

DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.045

M3 - Article

C2 - 30470653

AN - SCOPUS:85057038872

JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

SN - 0967-5868

ER -