Psychosis subgroups differ in intrinsic neural activity but not task-specific processing

Matthew E. Hudgens-Haney, Lauren E. Ethridge, Jennifer E. McDowell, Sarah K. Keedy, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Carol A. Tamminga, Matcheri S. Keshavan, John A. Sweeney, Brett A. Clementz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Individuals with psychosis often show high levels of intrinsic, or nonspecific, neural activity, but attenuated stimulus-specific activity. Clementz et al. (2016) proposed that one subgroup of psychosis cases has accentuated intrinsic activity (Biotype-2's) and a different subgroup (Biotype-1's) has diminished intrinsic activity, with both groups exhibiting varying degrees of cognitive deficits. This model was studied by assessing neural activity in psychosis probands (N = 105) during baseline and a 5. second period in preparation for a pro-/anti-saccade task. Steady-state stimuli allowed real-time assessment of modulation of visuocortical investment to different target locations.Psychosis probands as a whole showed poor antisaccade performance. As expected, Biotype-1 showed diminished intrinsic neural activity and the worst behavior, and Biotype-2 showed accentuated intrinsic activity and less deviant behavior. Both of these groups also exhibited less dynamic oscillatory phase synchrony. Biotype-3 showed no neurophysiological differences from healthy individuals, despite a history of psychosis. Interestingly, all psychosis subgroups showed normal (i.e., not different from healthy) preparatory modulation of visuocortical investment as a function of cognitive demands, despite varying levels of task performance. Similar analyses conducted subgrouping cases by psychotic symptomatology revealed fewer and less consistent differences, including no intrinsic activity differences between any clinical subgroup and healthy individuals. This study illustrates that (i) differences in intrinsic neural activity may be a fundamental characteristic of psychosis and need to be evaluated separately from stimulus-specific responses, and (ii) grouping patients based on multidimensional classification using neurobiological data may have advantages for resolving heterogeneity and clarifying illness mechanisms relative to traditional psychiatric diagnoses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSchizophrenia Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Psychotic Disorders
Saccades
Task Performance and Analysis
Mental Disorders
Individuality
Cognition

Keywords

  • Biomarkers
  • Bipolar disorder
  • EEG
  • Psychosis
  • Schizophrenia
  • Steady-state

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Hudgens-Haney, M. E., Ethridge, L. E., McDowell, J. E., Keedy, S. K., Pearlson, G. D., Tamminga, C. A., ... Clementz, B. A. (Accepted/In press). Psychosis subgroups differ in intrinsic neural activity but not task-specific processing. Schizophrenia Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.023

Psychosis subgroups differ in intrinsic neural activity but not task-specific processing. / Hudgens-Haney, Matthew E.; Ethridge, Lauren E.; McDowell, Jennifer E.; Keedy, Sarah K.; Pearlson, Godfrey D.; Tamminga, Carol A.; Keshavan, Matcheri S.; Sweeney, John A.; Clementz, Brett A.

In: Schizophrenia Research, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hudgens-Haney, ME, Ethridge, LE, McDowell, JE, Keedy, SK, Pearlson, GD, Tamminga, CA, Keshavan, MS, Sweeney, JA & Clementz, BA 2017, 'Psychosis subgroups differ in intrinsic neural activity but not task-specific processing', Schizophrenia Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.023
Hudgens-Haney, Matthew E. ; Ethridge, Lauren E. ; McDowell, Jennifer E. ; Keedy, Sarah K. ; Pearlson, Godfrey D. ; Tamminga, Carol A. ; Keshavan, Matcheri S. ; Sweeney, John A. ; Clementz, Brett A. / Psychosis subgroups differ in intrinsic neural activity but not task-specific processing. In: Schizophrenia Research. 2017.
@article{9e1eabd9fd084f48904ef9f06ee204b4,
title = "Psychosis subgroups differ in intrinsic neural activity but not task-specific processing",
abstract = "Individuals with psychosis often show high levels of intrinsic, or nonspecific, neural activity, but attenuated stimulus-specific activity. Clementz et al. (2016) proposed that one subgroup of psychosis cases has accentuated intrinsic activity (Biotype-2's) and a different subgroup (Biotype-1's) has diminished intrinsic activity, with both groups exhibiting varying degrees of cognitive deficits. This model was studied by assessing neural activity in psychosis probands (N = 105) during baseline and a 5. second period in preparation for a pro-/anti-saccade task. Steady-state stimuli allowed real-time assessment of modulation of visuocortical investment to different target locations.Psychosis probands as a whole showed poor antisaccade performance. As expected, Biotype-1 showed diminished intrinsic neural activity and the worst behavior, and Biotype-2 showed accentuated intrinsic activity and less deviant behavior. Both of these groups also exhibited less dynamic oscillatory phase synchrony. Biotype-3 showed no neurophysiological differences from healthy individuals, despite a history of psychosis. Interestingly, all psychosis subgroups showed normal (i.e., not different from healthy) preparatory modulation of visuocortical investment as a function of cognitive demands, despite varying levels of task performance. Similar analyses conducted subgrouping cases by psychotic symptomatology revealed fewer and less consistent differences, including no intrinsic activity differences between any clinical subgroup and healthy individuals. This study illustrates that (i) differences in intrinsic neural activity may be a fundamental characteristic of psychosis and need to be evaluated separately from stimulus-specific responses, and (ii) grouping patients based on multidimensional classification using neurobiological data may have advantages for resolving heterogeneity and clarifying illness mechanisms relative to traditional psychiatric diagnoses.",
keywords = "Biomarkers, Bipolar disorder, EEG, Psychosis, Schizophrenia, Steady-state",
author = "Hudgens-Haney, {Matthew E.} and Ethridge, {Lauren E.} and McDowell, {Jennifer E.} and Keedy, {Sarah K.} and Pearlson, {Godfrey D.} and Tamminga, {Carol A.} and Keshavan, {Matcheri S.} and Sweeney, {John A.} and Clementz, {Brett A.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.023",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Schizophrenia Research",
issn = "0920-9964",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychosis subgroups differ in intrinsic neural activity but not task-specific processing

AU - Hudgens-Haney, Matthew E.

AU - Ethridge, Lauren E.

AU - McDowell, Jennifer E.

AU - Keedy, Sarah K.

AU - Pearlson, Godfrey D.

AU - Tamminga, Carol A.

AU - Keshavan, Matcheri S.

AU - Sweeney, John A.

AU - Clementz, Brett A.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Individuals with psychosis often show high levels of intrinsic, or nonspecific, neural activity, but attenuated stimulus-specific activity. Clementz et al. (2016) proposed that one subgroup of psychosis cases has accentuated intrinsic activity (Biotype-2's) and a different subgroup (Biotype-1's) has diminished intrinsic activity, with both groups exhibiting varying degrees of cognitive deficits. This model was studied by assessing neural activity in psychosis probands (N = 105) during baseline and a 5. second period in preparation for a pro-/anti-saccade task. Steady-state stimuli allowed real-time assessment of modulation of visuocortical investment to different target locations.Psychosis probands as a whole showed poor antisaccade performance. As expected, Biotype-1 showed diminished intrinsic neural activity and the worst behavior, and Biotype-2 showed accentuated intrinsic activity and less deviant behavior. Both of these groups also exhibited less dynamic oscillatory phase synchrony. Biotype-3 showed no neurophysiological differences from healthy individuals, despite a history of psychosis. Interestingly, all psychosis subgroups showed normal (i.e., not different from healthy) preparatory modulation of visuocortical investment as a function of cognitive demands, despite varying levels of task performance. Similar analyses conducted subgrouping cases by psychotic symptomatology revealed fewer and less consistent differences, including no intrinsic activity differences between any clinical subgroup and healthy individuals. This study illustrates that (i) differences in intrinsic neural activity may be a fundamental characteristic of psychosis and need to be evaluated separately from stimulus-specific responses, and (ii) grouping patients based on multidimensional classification using neurobiological data may have advantages for resolving heterogeneity and clarifying illness mechanisms relative to traditional psychiatric diagnoses.

AB - Individuals with psychosis often show high levels of intrinsic, or nonspecific, neural activity, but attenuated stimulus-specific activity. Clementz et al. (2016) proposed that one subgroup of psychosis cases has accentuated intrinsic activity (Biotype-2's) and a different subgroup (Biotype-1's) has diminished intrinsic activity, with both groups exhibiting varying degrees of cognitive deficits. This model was studied by assessing neural activity in psychosis probands (N = 105) during baseline and a 5. second period in preparation for a pro-/anti-saccade task. Steady-state stimuli allowed real-time assessment of modulation of visuocortical investment to different target locations.Psychosis probands as a whole showed poor antisaccade performance. As expected, Biotype-1 showed diminished intrinsic neural activity and the worst behavior, and Biotype-2 showed accentuated intrinsic activity and less deviant behavior. Both of these groups also exhibited less dynamic oscillatory phase synchrony. Biotype-3 showed no neurophysiological differences from healthy individuals, despite a history of psychosis. Interestingly, all psychosis subgroups showed normal (i.e., not different from healthy) preparatory modulation of visuocortical investment as a function of cognitive demands, despite varying levels of task performance. Similar analyses conducted subgrouping cases by psychotic symptomatology revealed fewer and less consistent differences, including no intrinsic activity differences between any clinical subgroup and healthy individuals. This study illustrates that (i) differences in intrinsic neural activity may be a fundamental characteristic of psychosis and need to be evaluated separately from stimulus-specific responses, and (ii) grouping patients based on multidimensional classification using neurobiological data may have advantages for resolving heterogeneity and clarifying illness mechanisms relative to traditional psychiatric diagnoses.

KW - Biomarkers

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - EEG

KW - Psychosis

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Steady-state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028081775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028081775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.023

DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 28844436

AN - SCOPUS:85028081775

JO - Schizophrenia Research

JF - Schizophrenia Research

SN - 0920-9964

ER -