1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In its 1999 report, the Institute of Medicine estimated that medical error leads to between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths per year. Given that statistic, public reporting of quality and safety metrics is a welcome response that may serve to reduce the rate of adverse events and restore patients' trust in the health care system. To ensure that any public reporting system fulfills its potential, several questions must be addressed: Are we measuring the right metrics? Are the metrics accurate, valid, and is their public reporting effecting change? Based on a review of the literature, it is clear that current metrics suffer from low reliability, low validity, and possibly minimal relevance to the intended consumer. To improve data collection and analysis, both physicians and health care consumers need to be involved in the design and collection of metrics. Until we have a valid, reliable, and actionable data set at our fingertips, it would behoove patients, providers, and institutions to look at outcome and safety metrics with a skeptical and discerning eye.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)981e-985e
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume134
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Medical Errors
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Reproducibility of Results
Physicians
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Public reporting of patient safety metrics : Ready or not? / Podolsky, Daniel K.; Nagarkar, Purushottam A.; Reed, W. Gary; Rohrich, Rod J.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 134, No. 6, 2014, p. 981e-985e.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{719921ecf060459090cd741ee5f5e51c,
title = "Public reporting of patient safety metrics: Ready or not?",
abstract = "In its 1999 report, the Institute of Medicine estimated that medical error leads to between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths per year. Given that statistic, public reporting of quality and safety metrics is a welcome response that may serve to reduce the rate of adverse events and restore patients' trust in the health care system. To ensure that any public reporting system fulfills its potential, several questions must be addressed: Are we measuring the right metrics? Are the metrics accurate, valid, and is their public reporting effecting change? Based on a review of the literature, it is clear that current metrics suffer from low reliability, low validity, and possibly minimal relevance to the intended consumer. To improve data collection and analysis, both physicians and health care consumers need to be involved in the design and collection of metrics. Until we have a valid, reliable, and actionable data set at our fingertips, it would behoove patients, providers, and institutions to look at outcome and safety metrics with a skeptical and discerning eye.",
author = "Podolsky, {Daniel K.} and Nagarkar, {Purushottam A.} and Reed, {W. Gary} and Rohrich, {Rod J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000000713",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "981e--985e",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public reporting of patient safety metrics

T2 - Ready or not?

AU - Podolsky, Daniel K.

AU - Nagarkar, Purushottam A.

AU - Reed, W. Gary

AU - Rohrich, Rod J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In its 1999 report, the Institute of Medicine estimated that medical error leads to between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths per year. Given that statistic, public reporting of quality and safety metrics is a welcome response that may serve to reduce the rate of adverse events and restore patients' trust in the health care system. To ensure that any public reporting system fulfills its potential, several questions must be addressed: Are we measuring the right metrics? Are the metrics accurate, valid, and is their public reporting effecting change? Based on a review of the literature, it is clear that current metrics suffer from low reliability, low validity, and possibly minimal relevance to the intended consumer. To improve data collection and analysis, both physicians and health care consumers need to be involved in the design and collection of metrics. Until we have a valid, reliable, and actionable data set at our fingertips, it would behoove patients, providers, and institutions to look at outcome and safety metrics with a skeptical and discerning eye.

AB - In its 1999 report, the Institute of Medicine estimated that medical error leads to between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths per year. Given that statistic, public reporting of quality and safety metrics is a welcome response that may serve to reduce the rate of adverse events and restore patients' trust in the health care system. To ensure that any public reporting system fulfills its potential, several questions must be addressed: Are we measuring the right metrics? Are the metrics accurate, valid, and is their public reporting effecting change? Based on a review of the literature, it is clear that current metrics suffer from low reliability, low validity, and possibly minimal relevance to the intended consumer. To improve data collection and analysis, both physicians and health care consumers need to be involved in the design and collection of metrics. Until we have a valid, reliable, and actionable data set at our fingertips, it would behoove patients, providers, and institutions to look at outcome and safety metrics with a skeptical and discerning eye.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922480367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922480367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000713

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000713

M3 - Article

C2 - 25415121

AN - SCOPUS:84922480367

VL - 134

SP - 981e-985e

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 6

ER -