Publication or presentation of results from multicenter clinical trials: Evidence from an academic medical center

Aslan T. Turer, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Kate L. Compton, Robert M. Califf, Kevin A. Schulman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Nonpublication of research results threatens the integrity of clinical research, but the extent of nonpublication and factors associated with publication remain poorly documented. We sought to examine rates of publication or presentation of research findings from multicenter clinical trials and determine what factors are associated with dissemination of results. Methods: We conducted a follow-up study of 217 prospective, multicenter clinical trials of treatment approved in 1998 by the institutional review board of a large academic medical center, of which 197 had enrolled participants and were not known to be ongoing. Follow-up included searches of the literature and the Internet and telephone and e-mail inquiries to investigators and research sponsors. The main outcome measures were manuscript publication or other presentation of research results. Results: Results of 110 (56%) out of 197 multicenter clinical trials have been published in the peer-reviewed literature. Results of 87 (44%) studies have not been published, and results of 52 (26%) studies have not been disseminated in any form. The rate of dissemination of trial results was highest for studies that were phase 3 (81%), lowest risk (86%), and investigational (76%). The dissemination rate was lowest for studies that were supported by internal funds (50%). However, none of these associations were statistically significant. Conclusions: Results of almost half of the multicenter clinical trials conducted in part at a large academic medical center have never been published. Mechanisms to ensure public dissemination of clinical trial results are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)674-680
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume153
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Multicenter Studies
Publications
Clinical Trials
Research
Manuscripts
Research Ethics Committees
Postal Service
Financial Management
Telephone
Internet
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Publication or presentation of results from multicenter clinical trials : Evidence from an academic medical center. / Turer, Aslan T.; Mahaffey, Kenneth W.; Compton, Kate L.; Califf, Robert M.; Schulman, Kevin A.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 153, No. 4, 04.2007, p. 674-680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Turer, Aslan T. ; Mahaffey, Kenneth W. ; Compton, Kate L. ; Califf, Robert M. ; Schulman, Kevin A. / Publication or presentation of results from multicenter clinical trials : Evidence from an academic medical center. In: American Heart Journal. 2007 ; Vol. 153, No. 4. pp. 674-680.
@article{2aaf21af18e5460295180c51349bcd42,
title = "Publication or presentation of results from multicenter clinical trials: Evidence from an academic medical center",
abstract = "Background: Nonpublication of research results threatens the integrity of clinical research, but the extent of nonpublication and factors associated with publication remain poorly documented. We sought to examine rates of publication or presentation of research findings from multicenter clinical trials and determine what factors are associated with dissemination of results. Methods: We conducted a follow-up study of 217 prospective, multicenter clinical trials of treatment approved in 1998 by the institutional review board of a large academic medical center, of which 197 had enrolled participants and were not known to be ongoing. Follow-up included searches of the literature and the Internet and telephone and e-mail inquiries to investigators and research sponsors. The main outcome measures were manuscript publication or other presentation of research results. Results: Results of 110 (56{\%}) out of 197 multicenter clinical trials have been published in the peer-reviewed literature. Results of 87 (44{\%}) studies have not been published, and results of 52 (26{\%}) studies have not been disseminated in any form. The rate of dissemination of trial results was highest for studies that were phase 3 (81{\%}), lowest risk (86{\%}), and investigational (76{\%}). The dissemination rate was lowest for studies that were supported by internal funds (50{\%}). However, none of these associations were statistically significant. Conclusions: Results of almost half of the multicenter clinical trials conducted in part at a large academic medical center have never been published. Mechanisms to ensure public dissemination of clinical trial results are needed.",
author = "Turer, {Aslan T.} and Mahaffey, {Kenneth W.} and Compton, {Kate L.} and Califf, {Robert M.} and Schulman, {Kevin A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ahj.2007.01.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "153",
pages = "674--680",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Publication or presentation of results from multicenter clinical trials

T2 - Evidence from an academic medical center

AU - Turer, Aslan T.

AU - Mahaffey, Kenneth W.

AU - Compton, Kate L.

AU - Califf, Robert M.

AU - Schulman, Kevin A.

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Background: Nonpublication of research results threatens the integrity of clinical research, but the extent of nonpublication and factors associated with publication remain poorly documented. We sought to examine rates of publication or presentation of research findings from multicenter clinical trials and determine what factors are associated with dissemination of results. Methods: We conducted a follow-up study of 217 prospective, multicenter clinical trials of treatment approved in 1998 by the institutional review board of a large academic medical center, of which 197 had enrolled participants and were not known to be ongoing. Follow-up included searches of the literature and the Internet and telephone and e-mail inquiries to investigators and research sponsors. The main outcome measures were manuscript publication or other presentation of research results. Results: Results of 110 (56%) out of 197 multicenter clinical trials have been published in the peer-reviewed literature. Results of 87 (44%) studies have not been published, and results of 52 (26%) studies have not been disseminated in any form. The rate of dissemination of trial results was highest for studies that were phase 3 (81%), lowest risk (86%), and investigational (76%). The dissemination rate was lowest for studies that were supported by internal funds (50%). However, none of these associations were statistically significant. Conclusions: Results of almost half of the multicenter clinical trials conducted in part at a large academic medical center have never been published. Mechanisms to ensure public dissemination of clinical trial results are needed.

AB - Background: Nonpublication of research results threatens the integrity of clinical research, but the extent of nonpublication and factors associated with publication remain poorly documented. We sought to examine rates of publication or presentation of research findings from multicenter clinical trials and determine what factors are associated with dissemination of results. Methods: We conducted a follow-up study of 217 prospective, multicenter clinical trials of treatment approved in 1998 by the institutional review board of a large academic medical center, of which 197 had enrolled participants and were not known to be ongoing. Follow-up included searches of the literature and the Internet and telephone and e-mail inquiries to investigators and research sponsors. The main outcome measures were manuscript publication or other presentation of research results. Results: Results of 110 (56%) out of 197 multicenter clinical trials have been published in the peer-reviewed literature. Results of 87 (44%) studies have not been published, and results of 52 (26%) studies have not been disseminated in any form. The rate of dissemination of trial results was highest for studies that were phase 3 (81%), lowest risk (86%), and investigational (76%). The dissemination rate was lowest for studies that were supported by internal funds (50%). However, none of these associations were statistically significant. Conclusions: Results of almost half of the multicenter clinical trials conducted in part at a large academic medical center have never been published. Mechanisms to ensure public dissemination of clinical trial results are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947305657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947305657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.01.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.01.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 17383311

AN - SCOPUS:33947305657

VL - 153

SP - 674

EP - 680

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 4

ER -