Puncture wounds: Normal laboratory values in the face of severe infection in diabetics and non-diabetics

Lawrence A. Lavery, David G. Armstrong, Terri L. Quebedeaux, Steven C. Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using infected puncture wounds as a basis for comparison, we pose the question of whether white blood cell count (WBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is lower in diabetic patients with foot infections as compared with nondiabetic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This case control study consisted of two groups, both with infected puncture wounds of the foot, admitted to a 700-bed urban university teaching hospital between 1985 and 1992. The experimental group contained 77 patients with diabetes mellitus. The control group consisted of 69 patients without diabetes. All subjects received emergent incision and drainage of the affected site. RESULTS: Results revealed a normal WBC count in 57.6% of patients. The ESR was normal in 36.3% of admissions. More nondiabetic patients presented with normal ESR than diabetic patients (62.3% versus 13.7%, respectively; P <0.0001). Diabetic patients had a significantly higher mean WBC count and ESR than did nondiabetic patients. Pain was the principal complaint more frequently in nondiabetic patients (92.9% NDM versus 70.1% DM, respectively; P <0.005). Erythema (72.7% versus 51.4%; P = 0.008), and drainage (36.4% versus 7.1%; P <0.001) were more common in diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, while a glaringly elevated WBC count or ESR should alert the clinician to the possibility of infection, normal values should not be relied upon to rule out a serious event.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)521-525
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1996

Fingerprint

Punctures
Reference Values
Wounds and Injuries
Blood Sedimentation
Infection
Leukocyte Count
Foot
Drainage
Urban Hospitals
Erythema
Teaching Hospitals
Case-Control Studies
Diabetes Mellitus
Pain
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Puncture wounds : Normal laboratory values in the face of severe infection in diabetics and non-diabetics. / Lavery, Lawrence A.; Armstrong, David G.; Quebedeaux, Terri L.; Walker, Steven C.

In: American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 101, No. 5, 11.1996, p. 521-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lavery, Lawrence A. ; Armstrong, David G. ; Quebedeaux, Terri L. ; Walker, Steven C. / Puncture wounds : Normal laboratory values in the face of severe infection in diabetics and non-diabetics. In: American Journal of Medicine. 1996 ; Vol. 101, No. 5. pp. 521-525.
@article{8739a9d6a6f6490cbcbc158ec133eb99,
title = "Puncture wounds: Normal laboratory values in the face of severe infection in diabetics and non-diabetics",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Using infected puncture wounds as a basis for comparison, we pose the question of whether white blood cell count (WBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is lower in diabetic patients with foot infections as compared with nondiabetic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This case control study consisted of two groups, both with infected puncture wounds of the foot, admitted to a 700-bed urban university teaching hospital between 1985 and 1992. The experimental group contained 77 patients with diabetes mellitus. The control group consisted of 69 patients without diabetes. All subjects received emergent incision and drainage of the affected site. RESULTS: Results revealed a normal WBC count in 57.6{\%} of patients. The ESR was normal in 36.3{\%} of admissions. More nondiabetic patients presented with normal ESR than diabetic patients (62.3{\%} versus 13.7{\%}, respectively; P <0.0001). Diabetic patients had a significantly higher mean WBC count and ESR than did nondiabetic patients. Pain was the principal complaint more frequently in nondiabetic patients (92.9{\%} NDM versus 70.1{\%} DM, respectively; P <0.005). Erythema (72.7{\%} versus 51.4{\%}; P = 0.008), and drainage (36.4{\%} versus 7.1{\%}; P <0.001) were more common in diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, while a glaringly elevated WBC count or ESR should alert the clinician to the possibility of infection, normal values should not be relied upon to rule out a serious event.",
author = "Lavery, {Lawrence A.} and Armstrong, {David G.} and Quebedeaux, {Terri L.} and Walker, {Steven C.}",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00283-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "521--525",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Puncture wounds

T2 - Normal laboratory values in the face of severe infection in diabetics and non-diabetics

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

AU - Armstrong, David G.

AU - Quebedeaux, Terri L.

AU - Walker, Steven C.

PY - 1996/11

Y1 - 1996/11

N2 - PURPOSE: Using infected puncture wounds as a basis for comparison, we pose the question of whether white blood cell count (WBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is lower in diabetic patients with foot infections as compared with nondiabetic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This case control study consisted of two groups, both with infected puncture wounds of the foot, admitted to a 700-bed urban university teaching hospital between 1985 and 1992. The experimental group contained 77 patients with diabetes mellitus. The control group consisted of 69 patients without diabetes. All subjects received emergent incision and drainage of the affected site. RESULTS: Results revealed a normal WBC count in 57.6% of patients. The ESR was normal in 36.3% of admissions. More nondiabetic patients presented with normal ESR than diabetic patients (62.3% versus 13.7%, respectively; P <0.0001). Diabetic patients had a significantly higher mean WBC count and ESR than did nondiabetic patients. Pain was the principal complaint more frequently in nondiabetic patients (92.9% NDM versus 70.1% DM, respectively; P <0.005). Erythema (72.7% versus 51.4%; P = 0.008), and drainage (36.4% versus 7.1%; P <0.001) were more common in diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, while a glaringly elevated WBC count or ESR should alert the clinician to the possibility of infection, normal values should not be relied upon to rule out a serious event.

AB - PURPOSE: Using infected puncture wounds as a basis for comparison, we pose the question of whether white blood cell count (WBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is lower in diabetic patients with foot infections as compared with nondiabetic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This case control study consisted of two groups, both with infected puncture wounds of the foot, admitted to a 700-bed urban university teaching hospital between 1985 and 1992. The experimental group contained 77 patients with diabetes mellitus. The control group consisted of 69 patients without diabetes. All subjects received emergent incision and drainage of the affected site. RESULTS: Results revealed a normal WBC count in 57.6% of patients. The ESR was normal in 36.3% of admissions. More nondiabetic patients presented with normal ESR than diabetic patients (62.3% versus 13.7%, respectively; P <0.0001). Diabetic patients had a significantly higher mean WBC count and ESR than did nondiabetic patients. Pain was the principal complaint more frequently in nondiabetic patients (92.9% NDM versus 70.1% DM, respectively; P <0.005). Erythema (72.7% versus 51.4%; P = 0.008), and drainage (36.4% versus 7.1%; P <0.001) were more common in diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, while a glaringly elevated WBC count or ESR should alert the clinician to the possibility of infection, normal values should not be relied upon to rule out a serious event.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030281339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030281339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00283-5

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00283-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 8948276

AN - SCOPUS:0030281339

VL - 101

SP - 521

EP - 525

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 5

ER -