Pursuit of accredited subspecialties by graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-2012

William F. Rayburn, Norman F. Gant, Larry C. Gilstrap, Erika C. Elwell, Sterling B. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate whether there has been an increase in resident graduates pursuing fellowship training in the currently accredited subspecialties and to compare whether any trend toward subspecialization is similar to those seen in other specialties. Methods: This descriptive study examined data from the National Residency Match Program for academic years 2000-2012. Annual comparisons were made between the numbers of residents who either pursued careers in their specialty or were accepted into fellowship training in an accredited subspecialty. We compared the numbers in each group who took the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) written board examination and who became board-certified. Results: Although the annual number of residency graduates in obstetrics and gynecology remained essentially the same (1,185±56), the proportion of graduates accepted into fellowships increased steadily in all subspecialties (from 7.0% in 2000 to 19.5% in 2012). All other core specialties saw higher proportions of their graduates pursuing subspecialties except for family medicine. Coincident with rises in fellowship programs and positions was eventual increase in trainees who took the ABOG written examination for the first time in the three established subspecialties (maternal-fetal medicine, gynecologic oncology, reproductive endocrinology and infertility) and who became board-certified. Conclusion: Like with residents in other specialties, more graduates in obstetrics and gynecology are pursuing accredited subspecialty fellowship training, adding to the complexities of workforce planning. The percent of obstetrics and gynecology residents who pursued accredited subspecialty fellowship training was lower than all but one other specialty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)619-625
Number of pages7
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume120
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Gynecology
Obstetrics
Internship and Residency
Medicine
Endocrinology
Infertility
Mothers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Pursuit of accredited subspecialties by graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-2012. / Rayburn, William F.; Gant, Norman F.; Gilstrap, Larry C.; Elwell, Erika C.; Williams, Sterling B.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 120, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 619-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rayburn, William F. ; Gant, Norman F. ; Gilstrap, Larry C. ; Elwell, Erika C. ; Williams, Sterling B. / Pursuit of accredited subspecialties by graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-2012. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012 ; Vol. 120, No. 3. pp. 619-625.
@article{0cbb182ac41144d581a3a16f457fdf67,
title = "Pursuit of accredited subspecialties by graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-2012",
abstract = "Objectives: To estimate whether there has been an increase in resident graduates pursuing fellowship training in the currently accredited subspecialties and to compare whether any trend toward subspecialization is similar to those seen in other specialties. Methods: This descriptive study examined data from the National Residency Match Program for academic years 2000-2012. Annual comparisons were made between the numbers of residents who either pursued careers in their specialty or were accepted into fellowship training in an accredited subspecialty. We compared the numbers in each group who took the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) written board examination and who became board-certified. Results: Although the annual number of residency graduates in obstetrics and gynecology remained essentially the same (1,185±56), the proportion of graduates accepted into fellowships increased steadily in all subspecialties (from 7.0{\%} in 2000 to 19.5{\%} in 2012). All other core specialties saw higher proportions of their graduates pursuing subspecialties except for family medicine. Coincident with rises in fellowship programs and positions was eventual increase in trainees who took the ABOG written examination for the first time in the three established subspecialties (maternal-fetal medicine, gynecologic oncology, reproductive endocrinology and infertility) and who became board-certified. Conclusion: Like with residents in other specialties, more graduates in obstetrics and gynecology are pursuing accredited subspecialty fellowship training, adding to the complexities of workforce planning. The percent of obstetrics and gynecology residents who pursued accredited subspecialty fellowship training was lower than all but one other specialty.",
author = "Rayburn, {William F.} and Gant, {Norman F.} and Gilstrap, {Larry C.} and Elwell, {Erika C.} and Williams, {Sterling B.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265ab0a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "619--625",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pursuit of accredited subspecialties by graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-2012

AU - Rayburn, William F.

AU - Gant, Norman F.

AU - Gilstrap, Larry C.

AU - Elwell, Erika C.

AU - Williams, Sterling B.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Objectives: To estimate whether there has been an increase in resident graduates pursuing fellowship training in the currently accredited subspecialties and to compare whether any trend toward subspecialization is similar to those seen in other specialties. Methods: This descriptive study examined data from the National Residency Match Program for academic years 2000-2012. Annual comparisons were made between the numbers of residents who either pursued careers in their specialty or were accepted into fellowship training in an accredited subspecialty. We compared the numbers in each group who took the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) written board examination and who became board-certified. Results: Although the annual number of residency graduates in obstetrics and gynecology remained essentially the same (1,185±56), the proportion of graduates accepted into fellowships increased steadily in all subspecialties (from 7.0% in 2000 to 19.5% in 2012). All other core specialties saw higher proportions of their graduates pursuing subspecialties except for family medicine. Coincident with rises in fellowship programs and positions was eventual increase in trainees who took the ABOG written examination for the first time in the three established subspecialties (maternal-fetal medicine, gynecologic oncology, reproductive endocrinology and infertility) and who became board-certified. Conclusion: Like with residents in other specialties, more graduates in obstetrics and gynecology are pursuing accredited subspecialty fellowship training, adding to the complexities of workforce planning. The percent of obstetrics and gynecology residents who pursued accredited subspecialty fellowship training was lower than all but one other specialty.

AB - Objectives: To estimate whether there has been an increase in resident graduates pursuing fellowship training in the currently accredited subspecialties and to compare whether any trend toward subspecialization is similar to those seen in other specialties. Methods: This descriptive study examined data from the National Residency Match Program for academic years 2000-2012. Annual comparisons were made between the numbers of residents who either pursued careers in their specialty or were accepted into fellowship training in an accredited subspecialty. We compared the numbers in each group who took the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) written board examination and who became board-certified. Results: Although the annual number of residency graduates in obstetrics and gynecology remained essentially the same (1,185±56), the proportion of graduates accepted into fellowships increased steadily in all subspecialties (from 7.0% in 2000 to 19.5% in 2012). All other core specialties saw higher proportions of their graduates pursuing subspecialties except for family medicine. Coincident with rises in fellowship programs and positions was eventual increase in trainees who took the ABOG written examination for the first time in the three established subspecialties (maternal-fetal medicine, gynecologic oncology, reproductive endocrinology and infertility) and who became board-certified. Conclusion: Like with residents in other specialties, more graduates in obstetrics and gynecology are pursuing accredited subspecialty fellowship training, adding to the complexities of workforce planning. The percent of obstetrics and gynecology residents who pursued accredited subspecialty fellowship training was lower than all but one other specialty.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865631413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865631413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265ab0a

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265ab0a

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 619

EP - 625

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 3

ER -