PyloriTeK II for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection

M. M. Yousfi, H. M T El-Zimaity, R. M. Genta, D. Y. Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Rapid urease tests are commonly used as a convenient method to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Our previous experiments demonstrated enhanced efficacy of agar gel rapid urease test compared to reagent strip rapid urease tests. We evaluated the efficacy of PyloriTek II (Serim Research Inc., Elkhart, IN), a new commercially available reagent strip rapid test, for detecting H. pylori infection. Methods: Gastric antral mucosal biopsies (jumbo forceps) were obtained from 100 patients for comparison between agar gel RUT and PyloriTek II (200 specimens). The rapid urease test to be used first was selected randomly. A warmer was used for the gel RUT. Biopsies obtained from a nearby area were stained using the Genta stain for determination of H. pylori status. Culture was performed to confirm H. pylori status when encountering a false rapid urease test. Results: Fifty of the 100 patients had peptic ulcer disease, 16 had dyspepsia; 31 had active H. pylori infection, and 3 had MALT lymphoma; 68 had H. pylori infection. There were two false negative and one false positive PyloriTek II when scored at 1 hour, compared to only one false positive and no false negative tests at 2 hours. While with agar gel RUT, there were no false positive tests and 5 false negative tests when scored at 1 hour and one at 24 hours; there were no false positive tests. The sensitivity and specificity's of PyloriTek II and agar gel RUTs were both >90% at 1 and 2 hours. PyloriTek II resulted in an erroneous categorization of H. pylori status and using PyloriTek occurred in 3% (95% C.I. = 1-9%) compared to 5% for agar gel RUTs (1.6-11%) at 1 hour (p>0.7). Conclusion: The new reagent strip rapid urease test, PyloriTek II is rapid and comparable in accuracy to the agar gel rapid urease tests for detecting H. pylori infection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)362
Number of pages1
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume43
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Helicobacter Infections
Urease
Helicobacter pylori
Agar
Gels
Reagent Strips
Biopsy
Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma
Dyspepsia
Peptic Ulcer
Surgical Instruments
Stomach
Coloring Agents
Sensitivity and Specificity
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Yousfi, M. M., El-Zimaity, H. M. T., Genta, R. M., & Graham, D. Y. (1996). PyloriTeK II for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 43(4), 362.

PyloriTeK II for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. / Yousfi, M. M.; El-Zimaity, H. M T; Genta, R. M.; Graham, D. Y.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1996, p. 362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yousfi, MM, El-Zimaity, HMT, Genta, RM & Graham, DY 1996, 'PyloriTeK II for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 362.
Yousfi, M. M. ; El-Zimaity, H. M T ; Genta, R. M. ; Graham, D. Y. / PyloriTeK II for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 362.
@article{5eb35ad58f464dcfbe9698605b708757,
title = "PyloriTeK II for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection",
abstract = "Background: Rapid urease tests are commonly used as a convenient method to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Our previous experiments demonstrated enhanced efficacy of agar gel rapid urease test compared to reagent strip rapid urease tests. We evaluated the efficacy of PyloriTek II (Serim Research Inc., Elkhart, IN), a new commercially available reagent strip rapid test, for detecting H. pylori infection. Methods: Gastric antral mucosal biopsies (jumbo forceps) were obtained from 100 patients for comparison between agar gel RUT and PyloriTek II (200 specimens). The rapid urease test to be used first was selected randomly. A warmer was used for the gel RUT. Biopsies obtained from a nearby area were stained using the Genta stain for determination of H. pylori status. Culture was performed to confirm H. pylori status when encountering a false rapid urease test. Results: Fifty of the 100 patients had peptic ulcer disease, 16 had dyspepsia; 31 had active H. pylori infection, and 3 had MALT lymphoma; 68 had H. pylori infection. There were two false negative and one false positive PyloriTek II when scored at 1 hour, compared to only one false positive and no false negative tests at 2 hours. While with agar gel RUT, there were no false positive tests and 5 false negative tests when scored at 1 hour and one at 24 hours; there were no false positive tests. The sensitivity and specificity's of PyloriTek II and agar gel RUTs were both >90{\%} at 1 and 2 hours. PyloriTek II resulted in an erroneous categorization of H. pylori status and using PyloriTek occurred in 3{\%} (95{\%} C.I. = 1-9{\%}) compared to 5{\%} for agar gel RUTs (1.6-11{\%}) at 1 hour (p>0.7). Conclusion: The new reagent strip rapid urease test, PyloriTek II is rapid and comparable in accuracy to the agar gel rapid urease tests for detecting H. pylori infection.",
author = "Yousfi, {M. M.} and El-Zimaity, {H. M T} and Genta, {R. M.} and Graham, {D. Y.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "362",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PyloriTeK II for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection

AU - Yousfi, M. M.

AU - El-Zimaity, H. M T

AU - Genta, R. M.

AU - Graham, D. Y.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Background: Rapid urease tests are commonly used as a convenient method to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Our previous experiments demonstrated enhanced efficacy of agar gel rapid urease test compared to reagent strip rapid urease tests. We evaluated the efficacy of PyloriTek II (Serim Research Inc., Elkhart, IN), a new commercially available reagent strip rapid test, for detecting H. pylori infection. Methods: Gastric antral mucosal biopsies (jumbo forceps) were obtained from 100 patients for comparison between agar gel RUT and PyloriTek II (200 specimens). The rapid urease test to be used first was selected randomly. A warmer was used for the gel RUT. Biopsies obtained from a nearby area were stained using the Genta stain for determination of H. pylori status. Culture was performed to confirm H. pylori status when encountering a false rapid urease test. Results: Fifty of the 100 patients had peptic ulcer disease, 16 had dyspepsia; 31 had active H. pylori infection, and 3 had MALT lymphoma; 68 had H. pylori infection. There were two false negative and one false positive PyloriTek II when scored at 1 hour, compared to only one false positive and no false negative tests at 2 hours. While with agar gel RUT, there were no false positive tests and 5 false negative tests when scored at 1 hour and one at 24 hours; there were no false positive tests. The sensitivity and specificity's of PyloriTek II and agar gel RUTs were both >90% at 1 and 2 hours. PyloriTek II resulted in an erroneous categorization of H. pylori status and using PyloriTek occurred in 3% (95% C.I. = 1-9%) compared to 5% for agar gel RUTs (1.6-11%) at 1 hour (p>0.7). Conclusion: The new reagent strip rapid urease test, PyloriTek II is rapid and comparable in accuracy to the agar gel rapid urease tests for detecting H. pylori infection.

AB - Background: Rapid urease tests are commonly used as a convenient method to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Our previous experiments demonstrated enhanced efficacy of agar gel rapid urease test compared to reagent strip rapid urease tests. We evaluated the efficacy of PyloriTek II (Serim Research Inc., Elkhart, IN), a new commercially available reagent strip rapid test, for detecting H. pylori infection. Methods: Gastric antral mucosal biopsies (jumbo forceps) were obtained from 100 patients for comparison between agar gel RUT and PyloriTek II (200 specimens). The rapid urease test to be used first was selected randomly. A warmer was used for the gel RUT. Biopsies obtained from a nearby area were stained using the Genta stain for determination of H. pylori status. Culture was performed to confirm H. pylori status when encountering a false rapid urease test. Results: Fifty of the 100 patients had peptic ulcer disease, 16 had dyspepsia; 31 had active H. pylori infection, and 3 had MALT lymphoma; 68 had H. pylori infection. There were two false negative and one false positive PyloriTek II when scored at 1 hour, compared to only one false positive and no false negative tests at 2 hours. While with agar gel RUT, there were no false positive tests and 5 false negative tests when scored at 1 hour and one at 24 hours; there were no false positive tests. The sensitivity and specificity's of PyloriTek II and agar gel RUTs were both >90% at 1 and 2 hours. PyloriTek II resulted in an erroneous categorization of H. pylori status and using PyloriTek occurred in 3% (95% C.I. = 1-9%) compared to 5% for agar gel RUTs (1.6-11%) at 1 hour (p>0.7). Conclusion: The new reagent strip rapid urease test, PyloriTek II is rapid and comparable in accuracy to the agar gel rapid urease tests for detecting H. pylori infection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748959752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748959752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 362

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -