Quality of care of the initial patient cohort of the diabetes collaborative registry®

Suzanne V. Arnold, Abhinav Goyal, Silvio E. Inzucchi, Darren K McGuire, Fengming Tang, Sanjeev N. Mehta, Laurence S. Sperling, Thomas M. Maddox, Daniel Einhorn, Nathan D. Wong, Niklas Hammar, Peter Fenici, Kamlesh Khunti, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Mikhail Kosiborod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background-Although guidelines and performance measures exist for patients with diabetes mellitus, achievement of these metrics is not well known. The Diabetes Collaborative Registry® (DCR) was formed to understand the quality of diabetes mellitus care across the primary and specialty care continuum in the United States. Methods and Results-We assessed the frequency of achievement of 7 diabetes mellitus-related quality metrics and variability across the Diabetes Collaborative Registry® sites. Among 574 972 patients with diabetes mellitus from 259 US practices, median (interquartile range) achievement of the quality metrics across the practices was the following: (1) glycemic control: 19% (5-47); (2) blood pressure control: 80% (67-88); (3) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with coronary artery disease: 62% (51-69); (4) nephropathy screening: 62% (53-71); (5) eye examination: 0.7% (0.0-79); (6) foot examination: 0.0% (0.0-2.3); and (7) tobacco screening/cessation counseling: 86% (80-94). In hierarchical, modified Poisson regression models, there was substantial variability in meeting these metrics across sites, particularly with documentation of glycemic control and eye and foot examinations. There was also notable variation across specialties, with endocrinology practices performing better on glycemic control and diabetes mellitus foot examinations and cardiology practices succeeding more in blood pressure control and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers. Conclusions-The Diabetes Collaborative Registry® was established to document and improve the quality of outpatient diabetes mellitus care. While target achievement of some metrics of cardiovascular risk modification was high, achievement of others was suboptimal and highly variable. This may be attributable to fragmentation of care, lack of ownership among various specialists concerning certain domains of care, incomplete documentation, true gaps in care, or a combination of these factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere005999
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume6
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Registries
Diabetes Mellitus
Foot
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Documentation
Tobacco Use Cessation
Blood Pressure
Ownership
Endocrinology
Cardiology
Counseling
Coronary Artery Disease
Primary Health Care
Outpatients
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Quality of care
  • Registry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Quality of care of the initial patient cohort of the diabetes collaborative registry®. / Arnold, Suzanne V.; Goyal, Abhinav; Inzucchi, Silvio E.; McGuire, Darren K; Tang, Fengming; Mehta, Sanjeev N.; Sperling, Laurence S.; Maddox, Thomas M.; Einhorn, Daniel; Wong, Nathan D.; Hammar, Niklas; Fenici, Peter; Khunti, Kamlesh; Lam, Carolyn S.P.; Kosiborod, Mikhail.

In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Vol. 6, No. 8, e005999, 01.08.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arnold, SV, Goyal, A, Inzucchi, SE, McGuire, DK, Tang, F, Mehta, SN, Sperling, LS, Maddox, TM, Einhorn, D, Wong, ND, Hammar, N, Fenici, P, Khunti, K, Lam, CSP & Kosiborod, M 2017, 'Quality of care of the initial patient cohort of the diabetes collaborative registry®', Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 6, no. 8, e005999. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005999
Arnold, Suzanne V. ; Goyal, Abhinav ; Inzucchi, Silvio E. ; McGuire, Darren K ; Tang, Fengming ; Mehta, Sanjeev N. ; Sperling, Laurence S. ; Maddox, Thomas M. ; Einhorn, Daniel ; Wong, Nathan D. ; Hammar, Niklas ; Fenici, Peter ; Khunti, Kamlesh ; Lam, Carolyn S.P. ; Kosiborod, Mikhail. / Quality of care of the initial patient cohort of the diabetes collaborative registry®. In: Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017 ; Vol. 6, No. 8.
@article{f9c33700221543bfa81e133484e938d1,
title = "Quality of care of the initial patient cohort of the diabetes collaborative registry{\circledR}",
abstract = "Background-Although guidelines and performance measures exist for patients with diabetes mellitus, achievement of these metrics is not well known. The Diabetes Collaborative Registry{\circledR} (DCR) was formed to understand the quality of diabetes mellitus care across the primary and specialty care continuum in the United States. Methods and Results-We assessed the frequency of achievement of 7 diabetes mellitus-related quality metrics and variability across the Diabetes Collaborative Registry{\circledR} sites. Among 574 972 patients with diabetes mellitus from 259 US practices, median (interquartile range) achievement of the quality metrics across the practices was the following: (1) glycemic control: 19{\%} (5-47); (2) blood pressure control: 80{\%} (67-88); (3) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with coronary artery disease: 62{\%} (51-69); (4) nephropathy screening: 62{\%} (53-71); (5) eye examination: 0.7{\%} (0.0-79); (6) foot examination: 0.0{\%} (0.0-2.3); and (7) tobacco screening/cessation counseling: 86{\%} (80-94). In hierarchical, modified Poisson regression models, there was substantial variability in meeting these metrics across sites, particularly with documentation of glycemic control and eye and foot examinations. There was also notable variation across specialties, with endocrinology practices performing better on glycemic control and diabetes mellitus foot examinations and cardiology practices succeeding more in blood pressure control and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers. Conclusions-The Diabetes Collaborative Registry{\circledR} was established to document and improve the quality of outpatient diabetes mellitus care. While target achievement of some metrics of cardiovascular risk modification was high, achievement of others was suboptimal and highly variable. This may be attributable to fragmentation of care, lack of ownership among various specialists concerning certain domains of care, incomplete documentation, true gaps in care, or a combination of these factors.",
keywords = "Diabetes mellitus, Quality of care, Registry",
author = "Arnold, {Suzanne V.} and Abhinav Goyal and Inzucchi, {Silvio E.} and McGuire, {Darren K} and Fengming Tang and Mehta, {Sanjeev N.} and Sperling, {Laurence S.} and Maddox, {Thomas M.} and Daniel Einhorn and Wong, {Nathan D.} and Niklas Hammar and Peter Fenici and Kamlesh Khunti and Lam, {Carolyn S.P.} and Mikhail Kosiborod",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/JAHA.117.005999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Journal of the American Heart Association",
issn = "2047-9980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of care of the initial patient cohort of the diabetes collaborative registry®

AU - Arnold, Suzanne V.

AU - Goyal, Abhinav

AU - Inzucchi, Silvio E.

AU - McGuire, Darren K

AU - Tang, Fengming

AU - Mehta, Sanjeev N.

AU - Sperling, Laurence S.

AU - Maddox, Thomas M.

AU - Einhorn, Daniel

AU - Wong, Nathan D.

AU - Hammar, Niklas

AU - Fenici, Peter

AU - Khunti, Kamlesh

AU - Lam, Carolyn S.P.

AU - Kosiborod, Mikhail

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Background-Although guidelines and performance measures exist for patients with diabetes mellitus, achievement of these metrics is not well known. The Diabetes Collaborative Registry® (DCR) was formed to understand the quality of diabetes mellitus care across the primary and specialty care continuum in the United States. Methods and Results-We assessed the frequency of achievement of 7 diabetes mellitus-related quality metrics and variability across the Diabetes Collaborative Registry® sites. Among 574 972 patients with diabetes mellitus from 259 US practices, median (interquartile range) achievement of the quality metrics across the practices was the following: (1) glycemic control: 19% (5-47); (2) blood pressure control: 80% (67-88); (3) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with coronary artery disease: 62% (51-69); (4) nephropathy screening: 62% (53-71); (5) eye examination: 0.7% (0.0-79); (6) foot examination: 0.0% (0.0-2.3); and (7) tobacco screening/cessation counseling: 86% (80-94). In hierarchical, modified Poisson regression models, there was substantial variability in meeting these metrics across sites, particularly with documentation of glycemic control and eye and foot examinations. There was also notable variation across specialties, with endocrinology practices performing better on glycemic control and diabetes mellitus foot examinations and cardiology practices succeeding more in blood pressure control and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers. Conclusions-The Diabetes Collaborative Registry® was established to document and improve the quality of outpatient diabetes mellitus care. While target achievement of some metrics of cardiovascular risk modification was high, achievement of others was suboptimal and highly variable. This may be attributable to fragmentation of care, lack of ownership among various specialists concerning certain domains of care, incomplete documentation, true gaps in care, or a combination of these factors.

AB - Background-Although guidelines and performance measures exist for patients with diabetes mellitus, achievement of these metrics is not well known. The Diabetes Collaborative Registry® (DCR) was formed to understand the quality of diabetes mellitus care across the primary and specialty care continuum in the United States. Methods and Results-We assessed the frequency of achievement of 7 diabetes mellitus-related quality metrics and variability across the Diabetes Collaborative Registry® sites. Among 574 972 patients with diabetes mellitus from 259 US practices, median (interquartile range) achievement of the quality metrics across the practices was the following: (1) glycemic control: 19% (5-47); (2) blood pressure control: 80% (67-88); (3) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with coronary artery disease: 62% (51-69); (4) nephropathy screening: 62% (53-71); (5) eye examination: 0.7% (0.0-79); (6) foot examination: 0.0% (0.0-2.3); and (7) tobacco screening/cessation counseling: 86% (80-94). In hierarchical, modified Poisson regression models, there was substantial variability in meeting these metrics across sites, particularly with documentation of glycemic control and eye and foot examinations. There was also notable variation across specialties, with endocrinology practices performing better on glycemic control and diabetes mellitus foot examinations and cardiology practices succeeding more in blood pressure control and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers. Conclusions-The Diabetes Collaborative Registry® was established to document and improve the quality of outpatient diabetes mellitus care. While target achievement of some metrics of cardiovascular risk modification was high, achievement of others was suboptimal and highly variable. This may be attributable to fragmentation of care, lack of ownership among various specialists concerning certain domains of care, incomplete documentation, true gaps in care, or a combination of these factors.

KW - Diabetes mellitus

KW - Quality of care

KW - Registry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030725630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030725630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.117.005999

DO - 10.1161/JAHA.117.005999

M3 - Article

C2 - 28862933

AN - SCOPUS:85030725630

VL - 6

JO - Journal of the American Heart Association

JF - Journal of the American Heart Association

SN - 2047-9980

IS - 8

M1 - e005999

ER -