Quality of care within a trauma center is not altered by injury type

Shahid Shafi, Chul Ahn, Jennifer Parks, Avery B. Nathens, Henry M. Cryer, Larry M. Gentilello, Mark Hemmila, John J. Fildes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated variations in severity-adjusted mortality between trauma centers. However, it is not clear if outcomes vary by the type of injury being treated. METHODS: National Trauma Data Bank was used to identify patients 16 years or older with moderate to severe injuries (Abbreviated Injury score 3) treated at level I or II trauma centers (n = 127,439 patients, 105 centers). Observed-to-Expected mortality ratios (O/E ratios, 95% confidence interval [CI]) were calculated for each trauma center within each of the three injury types: blunt multisystem (two or more body regions; n = 27,980; crude mortality, 15%), penetrating torso (neck, chest, or abdomen; n = 9,486; crude mortality, 9%), and blunt single system (n = 89,973; crude mortality 5%). Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for age, gender, mechanism, transfer status, and injury severity (Glasgow Coma Scale, blood pressure). For each injury type, trauma centers performance was ranked as high (O/E with 95% CI <1), low (O/E with 95% CI >1), or average performers (O/E overlapping 1). RESULTS: Almost three quarters of the trauma centers achieved the same performance rank in each of the three injury categories. There were 14 low-performing trauma centers in blunt multisystem injuries, six in penetrating torso injuries, and nine in the blunt single system injuries group. None of these centers achieved high performance in any other type of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adjusted outcomes are consistent within trauma centers across different types of injuries, suggesting that quality improvement efforts should measure, analyze, and focus on hospital-wide systems of care, rather than on isolated quality domains related to specific types of injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)716-720
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries
Mortality
Torso
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Confidence Intervals
Body Regions
Glasgow Coma Scale
Quality Improvement
Abdomen
Neck
Thorax
Logistic Models
Databases

Keywords

  • Quality of care
  • TQIP
  • Trauma centers
  • Trauma systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Shafi, S., Ahn, C., Parks, J., Nathens, A. B., Cryer, H. M., Gentilello, L. M., ... Fildes, J. J. (2010). Quality of care within a trauma center is not altered by injury type. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 68(3), 716-720. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7bec0

Quality of care within a trauma center is not altered by injury type. / Shafi, Shahid; Ahn, Chul; Parks, Jennifer; Nathens, Avery B.; Cryer, Henry M.; Gentilello, Larry M.; Hemmila, Mark; Fildes, John J.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 68, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 716-720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shafi, S, Ahn, C, Parks, J, Nathens, AB, Cryer, HM, Gentilello, LM, Hemmila, M & Fildes, JJ 2010, 'Quality of care within a trauma center is not altered by injury type', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 716-720. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7bec0
Shafi, Shahid ; Ahn, Chul ; Parks, Jennifer ; Nathens, Avery B. ; Cryer, Henry M. ; Gentilello, Larry M. ; Hemmila, Mark ; Fildes, John J. / Quality of care within a trauma center is not altered by injury type. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2010 ; Vol. 68, No. 3. pp. 716-720.
@article{22e1427c000e46a39a166f46218d3a2d,
title = "Quality of care within a trauma center is not altered by injury type",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated variations in severity-adjusted mortality between trauma centers. However, it is not clear if outcomes vary by the type of injury being treated. METHODS: National Trauma Data Bank was used to identify patients 16 years or older with moderate to severe injuries (Abbreviated Injury score 3) treated at level I or II trauma centers (n = 127,439 patients, 105 centers). Observed-to-Expected mortality ratios (O/E ratios, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]) were calculated for each trauma center within each of the three injury types: blunt multisystem (two or more body regions; n = 27,980; crude mortality, 15{\%}), penetrating torso (neck, chest, or abdomen; n = 9,486; crude mortality, 9{\%}), and blunt single system (n = 89,973; crude mortality 5{\%}). Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for age, gender, mechanism, transfer status, and injury severity (Glasgow Coma Scale, blood pressure). For each injury type, trauma centers performance was ranked as high (O/E with 95{\%} CI <1), low (O/E with 95{\%} CI >1), or average performers (O/E overlapping 1). RESULTS: Almost three quarters of the trauma centers achieved the same performance rank in each of the three injury categories. There were 14 low-performing trauma centers in blunt multisystem injuries, six in penetrating torso injuries, and nine in the blunt single system injuries group. None of these centers achieved high performance in any other type of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adjusted outcomes are consistent within trauma centers across different types of injuries, suggesting that quality improvement efforts should measure, analyze, and focus on hospital-wide systems of care, rather than on isolated quality domains related to specific types of injury.",
keywords = "Quality of care, TQIP, Trauma centers, Trauma systems",
author = "Shahid Shafi and Chul Ahn and Jennifer Parks and Nathens, {Avery B.} and Cryer, {Henry M.} and Gentilello, {Larry M.} and Mark Hemmila and Fildes, {John J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7bec0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "716--720",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of care within a trauma center is not altered by injury type

AU - Shafi, Shahid

AU - Ahn, Chul

AU - Parks, Jennifer

AU - Nathens, Avery B.

AU - Cryer, Henry M.

AU - Gentilello, Larry M.

AU - Hemmila, Mark

AU - Fildes, John J.

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated variations in severity-adjusted mortality between trauma centers. However, it is not clear if outcomes vary by the type of injury being treated. METHODS: National Trauma Data Bank was used to identify patients 16 years or older with moderate to severe injuries (Abbreviated Injury score 3) treated at level I or II trauma centers (n = 127,439 patients, 105 centers). Observed-to-Expected mortality ratios (O/E ratios, 95% confidence interval [CI]) were calculated for each trauma center within each of the three injury types: blunt multisystem (two or more body regions; n = 27,980; crude mortality, 15%), penetrating torso (neck, chest, or abdomen; n = 9,486; crude mortality, 9%), and blunt single system (n = 89,973; crude mortality 5%). Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for age, gender, mechanism, transfer status, and injury severity (Glasgow Coma Scale, blood pressure). For each injury type, trauma centers performance was ranked as high (O/E with 95% CI <1), low (O/E with 95% CI >1), or average performers (O/E overlapping 1). RESULTS: Almost three quarters of the trauma centers achieved the same performance rank in each of the three injury categories. There were 14 low-performing trauma centers in blunt multisystem injuries, six in penetrating torso injuries, and nine in the blunt single system injuries group. None of these centers achieved high performance in any other type of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adjusted outcomes are consistent within trauma centers across different types of injuries, suggesting that quality improvement efforts should measure, analyze, and focus on hospital-wide systems of care, rather than on isolated quality domains related to specific types of injury.

AB - BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated variations in severity-adjusted mortality between trauma centers. However, it is not clear if outcomes vary by the type of injury being treated. METHODS: National Trauma Data Bank was used to identify patients 16 years or older with moderate to severe injuries (Abbreviated Injury score 3) treated at level I or II trauma centers (n = 127,439 patients, 105 centers). Observed-to-Expected mortality ratios (O/E ratios, 95% confidence interval [CI]) were calculated for each trauma center within each of the three injury types: blunt multisystem (two or more body regions; n = 27,980; crude mortality, 15%), penetrating torso (neck, chest, or abdomen; n = 9,486; crude mortality, 9%), and blunt single system (n = 89,973; crude mortality 5%). Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for age, gender, mechanism, transfer status, and injury severity (Glasgow Coma Scale, blood pressure). For each injury type, trauma centers performance was ranked as high (O/E with 95% CI <1), low (O/E with 95% CI >1), or average performers (O/E overlapping 1). RESULTS: Almost three quarters of the trauma centers achieved the same performance rank in each of the three injury categories. There were 14 low-performing trauma centers in blunt multisystem injuries, six in penetrating torso injuries, and nine in the blunt single system injuries group. None of these centers achieved high performance in any other type of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-adjusted outcomes are consistent within trauma centers across different types of injuries, suggesting that quality improvement efforts should measure, analyze, and focus on hospital-wide systems of care, rather than on isolated quality domains related to specific types of injury.

KW - Quality of care

KW - TQIP

KW - Trauma centers

KW - Trauma systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949431104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949431104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7bec0

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7bec0

M3 - Article

C2 - 20220425

AN - SCOPUS:77949431104

VL - 68

SP - 716

EP - 720

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 3

ER -