Quantification of cerebellar hemispheric purkinje cell linear density: 32 ET cases versus 16 controls

Elan D. Louis, Rachel Babij, Michelle Lee, Etty Cortés, Jean Paul G. Vonsattel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although essential tremor (ET) is among the most prevalent neurological diseases, its precise pathogenesis is not understood. Purkinje cell loss has been observed in some studies and is the focus of interest and debate. Expressing these data as Purkinje cells/layer length allows one to adjust for the inherent curved nature of the cerebellar folia. Capitalizing on the Essential Tremor Centralized Brain Repository, we quantified Purkinje cell linear density in cases versus controls. Free-floating 100-μm parasagittal cerebellar hemispheric sections were subjected to rabbit polyclonal anti-Calbindin D28k antibody, and 10 random fields/brain were selected for quantification of Purkinje cells/mm-1 Purkinje cell layer. Purkinje cell linear density was lower in 32 ET cases than in16 controls (1.14±0.32 vs. 1.35±0.31/mm-1, P=0.03). Purkinje cell linear density was inversely associated with torpedo count (r=-0.38, P=0.028). The current sample of ET cases demonstrates a reduction in Purkinje cell number relative to that of controls. Greater Purkinje cell axonal remodeling (torpedoes) was found in individuals who had the most Purkinje cell drop out. The role of Purkinje cell loss in the pathogenesis of this disorder merits additional study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1854-1859
Number of pages6
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume28
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brain
  • Cerebellum
  • Essential tremor
  • Neurodegenerative
  • Pathology
  • Pathophysiology
  • Purkinje cell

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantification of cerebellar hemispheric purkinje cell linear density: 32 ET cases versus 16 controls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this