Quantification of vaginal support

Are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?

Linda Brubaker, Matthew D. Barber, Ingrid Nygaard, Charlie W. Nager, Edward Varner, Joseph Schaffer, Anthony Visco, Susan Meikle, Cathie Spino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective This analysis compared 3 continuous variables as summary support loss (SL) scores with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification (POPQ) ordinal stages. Study Design We used pooled baseline data from 1141 subjects in 3 randomized trials (CARE, n = 322; OPUS, n = 380; ATLAS, n = 439) to test 3 SL measures. The relative responsiveness was assessed using the standardized response mean of 2-year outcome data from the CARE trial. Results Each SL measure was strongly correlated with POPQ ordinal staging; the single most distal POPQ point had the strongest correlation. Improvements in anatomic support were weakly correlated with improvements in POP Distress Inventory (r = 0.170.24; P < .01 for each) but not with changes in POP Impact Questionnaire for all measures of SL or POPQ stage. Conclusion While continuous, single number summary measures compared favorably to ordinal POPQ staging system, the single most distal POPQ point may be preferable to POPQ ordinal stages to summarize or compare group data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume203
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • outcome measures
  • pelvic organ prolapse
  • pelvic surgery
  • prolapse
  • quantification of prolapse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Quantification of vaginal support : Are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage? / Brubaker, Linda; Barber, Matthew D.; Nygaard, Ingrid; Nager, Charlie W.; Varner, Edward; Schaffer, Joseph; Visco, Anthony; Meikle, Susan; Spino, Cathie.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 203, No. 5, 11.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brubaker, Linda ; Barber, Matthew D. ; Nygaard, Ingrid ; Nager, Charlie W. ; Varner, Edward ; Schaffer, Joseph ; Visco, Anthony ; Meikle, Susan ; Spino, Cathie. / Quantification of vaginal support : Are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010 ; Vol. 203, No. 5.
@article{783b667ca1e840eb99364402f1d8dc0a,
title = "Quantification of vaginal support: Are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?",
abstract = "Objective This analysis compared 3 continuous variables as summary support loss (SL) scores with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification (POPQ) ordinal stages. Study Design We used pooled baseline data from 1141 subjects in 3 randomized trials (CARE, n = 322; OPUS, n = 380; ATLAS, n = 439) to test 3 SL measures. The relative responsiveness was assessed using the standardized response mean of 2-year outcome data from the CARE trial. Results Each SL measure was strongly correlated with POPQ ordinal staging; the single most distal POPQ point had the strongest correlation. Improvements in anatomic support were weakly correlated with improvements in POP Distress Inventory (r = 0.170.24; P < .01 for each) but not with changes in POP Impact Questionnaire for all measures of SL or POPQ stage. Conclusion While continuous, single number summary measures compared favorably to ordinal POPQ staging system, the single most distal POPQ point may be preferable to POPQ ordinal stages to summarize or compare group data.",
keywords = "outcome measures, pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic surgery, prolapse, quantification of prolapse",
author = "Linda Brubaker and Barber, {Matthew D.} and Ingrid Nygaard and Nager, {Charlie W.} and Edward Varner and Joseph Schaffer and Anthony Visco and Susan Meikle and Cathie Spino",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.071",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "203",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantification of vaginal support

T2 - Are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?

AU - Brubaker, Linda

AU - Barber, Matthew D.

AU - Nygaard, Ingrid

AU - Nager, Charlie W.

AU - Varner, Edward

AU - Schaffer, Joseph

AU - Visco, Anthony

AU - Meikle, Susan

AU - Spino, Cathie

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Objective This analysis compared 3 continuous variables as summary support loss (SL) scores with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification (POPQ) ordinal stages. Study Design We used pooled baseline data from 1141 subjects in 3 randomized trials (CARE, n = 322; OPUS, n = 380; ATLAS, n = 439) to test 3 SL measures. The relative responsiveness was assessed using the standardized response mean of 2-year outcome data from the CARE trial. Results Each SL measure was strongly correlated with POPQ ordinal staging; the single most distal POPQ point had the strongest correlation. Improvements in anatomic support were weakly correlated with improvements in POP Distress Inventory (r = 0.170.24; P < .01 for each) but not with changes in POP Impact Questionnaire for all measures of SL or POPQ stage. Conclusion While continuous, single number summary measures compared favorably to ordinal POPQ staging system, the single most distal POPQ point may be preferable to POPQ ordinal stages to summarize or compare group data.

AB - Objective This analysis compared 3 continuous variables as summary support loss (SL) scores with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification (POPQ) ordinal stages. Study Design We used pooled baseline data from 1141 subjects in 3 randomized trials (CARE, n = 322; OPUS, n = 380; ATLAS, n = 439) to test 3 SL measures. The relative responsiveness was assessed using the standardized response mean of 2-year outcome data from the CARE trial. Results Each SL measure was strongly correlated with POPQ ordinal staging; the single most distal POPQ point had the strongest correlation. Improvements in anatomic support were weakly correlated with improvements in POP Distress Inventory (r = 0.170.24; P < .01 for each) but not with changes in POP Impact Questionnaire for all measures of SL or POPQ stage. Conclusion While continuous, single number summary measures compared favorably to ordinal POPQ staging system, the single most distal POPQ point may be preferable to POPQ ordinal stages to summarize or compare group data.

KW - outcome measures

KW - pelvic organ prolapse

KW - pelvic surgery

KW - prolapse

KW - quantification of prolapse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149279785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149279785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.071

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.071

M3 - Article

VL - 203

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -