Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry

Patricia G. Moorman, Celette Sugg Skinner, James P. Evans, Beth Newman, James R. Sorenson, Brian Calingaert, Lisa Susswein, T. Sydnee Crankshaw, Cathrine Hoyo, Joellen M. Schildkraut

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Lower enrolment of minorities into research studies has been reported frequently. Most studies have little information about nonparticipants, making it difficult to identify characteristics associated with enrolment and how they might vary by race. Methods: Women who had previously participated in a population-based, case-control study of breast cancer in North Carolina were invited to enrol in a cancer genetics registry. Detailed questionnaire data on sociodemographic characteristics and cancer risk factors were available for all women. We compared characteristics of women who agreed to be in the registry with those who were deceased, were unlocatable, or declined enrolment. Unconditional logistic regression analyses were done to identify predictors of enrolment. Results: Enrolment rates were markedly lower among African Americans than Whites (15% and 36%, respectively) due to both lower contact rates (41% versus 63%) and lower enrolment rates among those contacted (37% versus 58%). Logistic regression models suggested that racial differences in enrolment were not due to socioeconomic characteristics or other cancer risk factors; race was the only significant predictor of enrolment in multivariable models (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.72). Conclusions: Although all women had previously taken part in a research study, African American women were less likely to enrol in the cancer genetics registry than White women. A possible explanation of these findings is that studies of genetics may present particular concerns for African Americans. Further research is needed to identify attitudes and issues that present barriers to participation among minorities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1349-1354
Number of pages6
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume13
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Registries
African Americans
Neoplasms
Logistic Models
Research
Case-Control Studies
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis
Confidence Intervals
Breast Neoplasms
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Moorman, P. G., Skinner, C. S., Evans, J. P., Newman, B., Sorenson, J. R., Calingaert, B., ... Schildkraut, J. M. (2004). Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 13(8), 1349-1354.

Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry. / Moorman, Patricia G.; Skinner, Celette Sugg; Evans, James P.; Newman, Beth; Sorenson, James R.; Calingaert, Brian; Susswein, Lisa; Crankshaw, T. Sydnee; Hoyo, Cathrine; Schildkraut, Joellen M.

In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 13, No. 8, 08.2004, p. 1349-1354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moorman, PG, Skinner, CS, Evans, JP, Newman, B, Sorenson, JR, Calingaert, B, Susswein, L, Crankshaw, TS, Hoyo, C & Schildkraut, JM 2004, 'Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry', Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1349-1354.
Moorman PG, Skinner CS, Evans JP, Newman B, Sorenson JR, Calingaert B et al. Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2004 Aug;13(8):1349-1354.
Moorman, Patricia G. ; Skinner, Celette Sugg ; Evans, James P. ; Newman, Beth ; Sorenson, James R. ; Calingaert, Brian ; Susswein, Lisa ; Crankshaw, T. Sydnee ; Hoyo, Cathrine ; Schildkraut, Joellen M. / Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry. In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2004 ; Vol. 13, No. 8. pp. 1349-1354.
@article{991920ee19f14e93861a775a1889ae02,
title = "Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry",
abstract = "Background: Lower enrolment of minorities into research studies has been reported frequently. Most studies have little information about nonparticipants, making it difficult to identify characteristics associated with enrolment and how they might vary by race. Methods: Women who had previously participated in a population-based, case-control study of breast cancer in North Carolina were invited to enrol in a cancer genetics registry. Detailed questionnaire data on sociodemographic characteristics and cancer risk factors were available for all women. We compared characteristics of women who agreed to be in the registry with those who were deceased, were unlocatable, or declined enrolment. Unconditional logistic regression analyses were done to identify predictors of enrolment. Results: Enrolment rates were markedly lower among African Americans than Whites (15{\%} and 36{\%}, respectively) due to both lower contact rates (41{\%} versus 63{\%}) and lower enrolment rates among those contacted (37{\%} versus 58{\%}). Logistic regression models suggested that racial differences in enrolment were not due to socioeconomic characteristics or other cancer risk factors; race was the only significant predictor of enrolment in multivariable models (odds ratio 0.41, 95{\%} confidence interval 0.23-0.72). Conclusions: Although all women had previously taken part in a research study, African American women were less likely to enrol in the cancer genetics registry than White women. A possible explanation of these findings is that studies of genetics may present particular concerns for African Americans. Further research is needed to identify attitudes and issues that present barriers to participation among minorities.",
author = "Moorman, {Patricia G.} and Skinner, {Celette Sugg} and Evans, {James P.} and Beth Newman and Sorenson, {James R.} and Brian Calingaert and Lisa Susswein and Crankshaw, {T. Sydnee} and Cathrine Hoyo and Schildkraut, {Joellen M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1349--1354",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention",
issn = "1055-9965",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry

AU - Moorman, Patricia G.

AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg

AU - Evans, James P.

AU - Newman, Beth

AU - Sorenson, James R.

AU - Calingaert, Brian

AU - Susswein, Lisa

AU - Crankshaw, T. Sydnee

AU - Hoyo, Cathrine

AU - Schildkraut, Joellen M.

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Background: Lower enrolment of minorities into research studies has been reported frequently. Most studies have little information about nonparticipants, making it difficult to identify characteristics associated with enrolment and how they might vary by race. Methods: Women who had previously participated in a population-based, case-control study of breast cancer in North Carolina were invited to enrol in a cancer genetics registry. Detailed questionnaire data on sociodemographic characteristics and cancer risk factors were available for all women. We compared characteristics of women who agreed to be in the registry with those who were deceased, were unlocatable, or declined enrolment. Unconditional logistic regression analyses were done to identify predictors of enrolment. Results: Enrolment rates were markedly lower among African Americans than Whites (15% and 36%, respectively) due to both lower contact rates (41% versus 63%) and lower enrolment rates among those contacted (37% versus 58%). Logistic regression models suggested that racial differences in enrolment were not due to socioeconomic characteristics or other cancer risk factors; race was the only significant predictor of enrolment in multivariable models (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.72). Conclusions: Although all women had previously taken part in a research study, African American women were less likely to enrol in the cancer genetics registry than White women. A possible explanation of these findings is that studies of genetics may present particular concerns for African Americans. Further research is needed to identify attitudes and issues that present barriers to participation among minorities.

AB - Background: Lower enrolment of minorities into research studies has been reported frequently. Most studies have little information about nonparticipants, making it difficult to identify characteristics associated with enrolment and how they might vary by race. Methods: Women who had previously participated in a population-based, case-control study of breast cancer in North Carolina were invited to enrol in a cancer genetics registry. Detailed questionnaire data on sociodemographic characteristics and cancer risk factors were available for all women. We compared characteristics of women who agreed to be in the registry with those who were deceased, were unlocatable, or declined enrolment. Unconditional logistic regression analyses were done to identify predictors of enrolment. Results: Enrolment rates were markedly lower among African Americans than Whites (15% and 36%, respectively) due to both lower contact rates (41% versus 63%) and lower enrolment rates among those contacted (37% versus 58%). Logistic regression models suggested that racial differences in enrolment were not due to socioeconomic characteristics or other cancer risk factors; race was the only significant predictor of enrolment in multivariable models (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.72). Conclusions: Although all women had previously taken part in a research study, African American women were less likely to enrol in the cancer genetics registry than White women. A possible explanation of these findings is that studies of genetics may present particular concerns for African Americans. Further research is needed to identify attitudes and issues that present barriers to participation among minorities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4043138903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4043138903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1349

EP - 1354

JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

SN - 1055-9965

IS - 8

ER -