TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiation exposure and safety practices during pediatric central line placement
AU - Saeman, Melody R.
AU - Burkhalter, Lorrie S.
AU - Blackburn, Timothy J.
AU - Murphy, Joseph T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Purpose Pediatric surgeons routinely use fluoroscopy for central venous line (CVL) placement. We examined radiation safety practices and patient/surgeon exposure during fluoroscopic CVL. Methods Fluoroscopic CVL procedures performed by 11 pediatric surgeons in 2012 were reviewed. Fluoroscopic time (FT), patient exposure (mGy), and procedural data were collected. Anthropomorphic phantom simulations were used to calculate scatter and dose (mSv). Surgeons were surveyed regarding safety practices. Results 386 procedures were reviewed. Median FT was 12.8 seconds. Median patient estimated effective dose was 0.13 mSv. Median annual FT per surgeon was 15.4 minutes. Simulations showed no significant difference (p = 0.14) between reported exposures (median 3.5 mGy/minute) and the modeled regression exposures from the C-arm default mode (median 3.4 mGy/minute). Median calculated surgeon exposure was 1.5 mGy/year. Eight of 11 surgeons responded to the survey. Only three reported 100% lead protection and frequent dosimeter use. Conclusion We found nonstandard radiation training, safety practices, and dose monitoring for the 11 surgeons. Based on simulations, the C-arm default setting was typically used instead of low dose. While most CVL procedures have low patient/surgeon doses, every effort should be used to minimize patient and occupational exposure, suggesting the need for formal hands-on training for nonradiologist providers using fluoroscopy.
AB - Purpose Pediatric surgeons routinely use fluoroscopy for central venous line (CVL) placement. We examined radiation safety practices and patient/surgeon exposure during fluoroscopic CVL. Methods Fluoroscopic CVL procedures performed by 11 pediatric surgeons in 2012 were reviewed. Fluoroscopic time (FT), patient exposure (mGy), and procedural data were collected. Anthropomorphic phantom simulations were used to calculate scatter and dose (mSv). Surgeons were surveyed regarding safety practices. Results 386 procedures were reviewed. Median FT was 12.8 seconds. Median patient estimated effective dose was 0.13 mSv. Median annual FT per surgeon was 15.4 minutes. Simulations showed no significant difference (p = 0.14) between reported exposures (median 3.5 mGy/minute) and the modeled regression exposures from the C-arm default mode (median 3.4 mGy/minute). Median calculated surgeon exposure was 1.5 mGy/year. Eight of 11 surgeons responded to the survey. Only three reported 100% lead protection and frequent dosimeter use. Conclusion We found nonstandard radiation training, safety practices, and dose monitoring for the 11 surgeons. Based on simulations, the C-arm default setting was typically used instead of low dose. While most CVL procedures have low patient/surgeon doses, every effort should be used to minimize patient and occupational exposure, suggesting the need for formal hands-on training for nonradiologist providers using fluoroscopy.
KW - Fluoroscopy
KW - Occupational exposure
KW - Pediatric
KW - Radiation dose
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929504863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929504863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.022
DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 25837269
AN - SCOPUS:84929504863
SN - 0022-3468
VL - 50
SP - 992
EP - 995
JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery
JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery
IS - 6
ER -