Radiological evidence of spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in patients with lower lumbar spondylolisthesis

Kevin T. Huang, Owoicho Adogwa, Ranjith Babu, Shivanand P. Lad, Carlos A. Bagley, Oren N. Gottfried

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with radiological evidence of spondylolisthesis. Objective: To establish the incidence and characteristics of spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in the setting of lower lumbar spondylolisthesis. Summary of Background Data: Spontaneous spinal arthrodesis of lumbar spondylolisthesis is a finding that is not discussed in the literature outside of isolated case reports. Identifying spontaneous spinal arthrodesis may impact the surgical plan, as patients with existing fusion may not require instrumentation and might require more work to reduce their spondylolisthesis. Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of 1490 lumbar spine computed tomography scans from the year 2010 for radiological evidence of spondylolisthesis at either L4-L5 or L5-S1. Patients were excluded if they had undergone previous lumbar surgery. Scans were assessed for the presence of spontaneous fusion based on the following criteria: (1) a solid bridging anterior or posterior vertebral body osteophyte, (2) contiguous bone formation from one vertebral body to another, or (3) contiguous bone across the facet joints bilaterally. Patients were characterized by demographic variables, radiological characteristics including type of spondylolisthesis, and presenting symptomology. Differences between patients in the fused and nonfused cohorts were compared with univariate analysis. Results: A total of 86 separate instances of spondylolisthesis were identified, of which 18 (20.9%) had radiological evidence of spontaneous fusion. The most common site of fusion was in the bilateral facets, followed by directly in the intervertebral disc space, and bridging osteophytes adjoining the vertebral bodies. There were significant differences between patients in the fused and nonfused cohorts in terms of average age (fused: 74.3 ± 10.7 yr vs. nonfused: 63.3 ± 18.6 yr, P = 0.019), sex (fused: 88.9% female vs. nonfused: 57.4% female, P = 0.013), and rate of pars defects (fused: 11.1% vs. nonfused: 35.3%, P = 0.047). Conclusion: In this study, 20.9% of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis have radiological signs of spontaneous fusion. Further work is needed to better characterize the natural history and clinical-radiological correlation of spontaneous fusion in spondylolisthesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)656-663
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2014

Fingerprint

Spondylolisthesis
Arthrodesis
Osteophyte
Zygapophyseal Joint
Intervertebral Disc
Natural History
Osteogenesis
Spine
Retrospective Studies
Tomography
Demography
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Lumbar spondylolisthesis
  • Natural history
  • Spinal autofusion
  • Spontaneous arthrodesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Radiological evidence of spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in patients with lower lumbar spondylolisthesis. / Huang, Kevin T.; Adogwa, Owoicho; Babu, Ranjith; Lad, Shivanand P.; Bagley, Carlos A.; Gottfried, Oren N.

In: Spine, Vol. 39, No. 8, 15.04.2014, p. 656-663.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huang, Kevin T. ; Adogwa, Owoicho ; Babu, Ranjith ; Lad, Shivanand P. ; Bagley, Carlos A. ; Gottfried, Oren N. / Radiological evidence of spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in patients with lower lumbar spondylolisthesis. In: Spine. 2014 ; Vol. 39, No. 8. pp. 656-663.
@article{80062c9dd6334e6b9bcf199500bfc083,
title = "Radiological evidence of spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in patients with lower lumbar spondylolisthesis",
abstract = "Study Design: Retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with radiological evidence of spondylolisthesis. Objective: To establish the incidence and characteristics of spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in the setting of lower lumbar spondylolisthesis. Summary of Background Data: Spontaneous spinal arthrodesis of lumbar spondylolisthesis is a finding that is not discussed in the literature outside of isolated case reports. Identifying spontaneous spinal arthrodesis may impact the surgical plan, as patients with existing fusion may not require instrumentation and might require more work to reduce their spondylolisthesis. Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of 1490 lumbar spine computed tomography scans from the year 2010 for radiological evidence of spondylolisthesis at either L4-L5 or L5-S1. Patients were excluded if they had undergone previous lumbar surgery. Scans were assessed for the presence of spontaneous fusion based on the following criteria: (1) a solid bridging anterior or posterior vertebral body osteophyte, (2) contiguous bone formation from one vertebral body to another, or (3) contiguous bone across the facet joints bilaterally. Patients were characterized by demographic variables, radiological characteristics including type of spondylolisthesis, and presenting symptomology. Differences between patients in the fused and nonfused cohorts were compared with univariate analysis. Results: A total of 86 separate instances of spondylolisthesis were identified, of which 18 (20.9{\%}) had radiological evidence of spontaneous fusion. The most common site of fusion was in the bilateral facets, followed by directly in the intervertebral disc space, and bridging osteophytes adjoining the vertebral bodies. There were significant differences between patients in the fused and nonfused cohorts in terms of average age (fused: 74.3 ± 10.7 yr vs. nonfused: 63.3 ± 18.6 yr, P = 0.019), sex (fused: 88.9{\%} female vs. nonfused: 57.4{\%} female, P = 0.013), and rate of pars defects (fused: 11.1{\%} vs. nonfused: 35.3{\%}, P = 0.047). Conclusion: In this study, 20.9{\%} of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis have radiological signs of spontaneous fusion. Further work is needed to better characterize the natural history and clinical-radiological correlation of spontaneous fusion in spondylolisthesis.",
keywords = "Lumbar spondylolisthesis, Natural history, Spinal autofusion, Spontaneous arthrodesis",
author = "Huang, {Kevin T.} and Owoicho Adogwa and Ranjith Babu and Lad, {Shivanand P.} and Bagley, {Carlos A.} and Gottfried, {Oren N.}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000000212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "656--663",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiological evidence of spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in patients with lower lumbar spondylolisthesis

AU - Huang, Kevin T.

AU - Adogwa, Owoicho

AU - Babu, Ranjith

AU - Lad, Shivanand P.

AU - Bagley, Carlos A.

AU - Gottfried, Oren N.

PY - 2014/4/15

Y1 - 2014/4/15

N2 - Study Design: Retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with radiological evidence of spondylolisthesis. Objective: To establish the incidence and characteristics of spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in the setting of lower lumbar spondylolisthesis. Summary of Background Data: Spontaneous spinal arthrodesis of lumbar spondylolisthesis is a finding that is not discussed in the literature outside of isolated case reports. Identifying spontaneous spinal arthrodesis may impact the surgical plan, as patients with existing fusion may not require instrumentation and might require more work to reduce their spondylolisthesis. Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of 1490 lumbar spine computed tomography scans from the year 2010 for radiological evidence of spondylolisthesis at either L4-L5 or L5-S1. Patients were excluded if they had undergone previous lumbar surgery. Scans were assessed for the presence of spontaneous fusion based on the following criteria: (1) a solid bridging anterior or posterior vertebral body osteophyte, (2) contiguous bone formation from one vertebral body to another, or (3) contiguous bone across the facet joints bilaterally. Patients were characterized by demographic variables, radiological characteristics including type of spondylolisthesis, and presenting symptomology. Differences between patients in the fused and nonfused cohorts were compared with univariate analysis. Results: A total of 86 separate instances of spondylolisthesis were identified, of which 18 (20.9%) had radiological evidence of spontaneous fusion. The most common site of fusion was in the bilateral facets, followed by directly in the intervertebral disc space, and bridging osteophytes adjoining the vertebral bodies. There were significant differences between patients in the fused and nonfused cohorts in terms of average age (fused: 74.3 ± 10.7 yr vs. nonfused: 63.3 ± 18.6 yr, P = 0.019), sex (fused: 88.9% female vs. nonfused: 57.4% female, P = 0.013), and rate of pars defects (fused: 11.1% vs. nonfused: 35.3%, P = 0.047). Conclusion: In this study, 20.9% of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis have radiological signs of spontaneous fusion. Further work is needed to better characterize the natural history and clinical-radiological correlation of spontaneous fusion in spondylolisthesis.

AB - Study Design: Retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients with radiological evidence of spondylolisthesis. Objective: To establish the incidence and characteristics of spontaneous spinal arthrodesis in the setting of lower lumbar spondylolisthesis. Summary of Background Data: Spontaneous spinal arthrodesis of lumbar spondylolisthesis is a finding that is not discussed in the literature outside of isolated case reports. Identifying spontaneous spinal arthrodesis may impact the surgical plan, as patients with existing fusion may not require instrumentation and might require more work to reduce their spondylolisthesis. Methods: We reviewed a consecutive series of 1490 lumbar spine computed tomography scans from the year 2010 for radiological evidence of spondylolisthesis at either L4-L5 or L5-S1. Patients were excluded if they had undergone previous lumbar surgery. Scans were assessed for the presence of spontaneous fusion based on the following criteria: (1) a solid bridging anterior or posterior vertebral body osteophyte, (2) contiguous bone formation from one vertebral body to another, or (3) contiguous bone across the facet joints bilaterally. Patients were characterized by demographic variables, radiological characteristics including type of spondylolisthesis, and presenting symptomology. Differences between patients in the fused and nonfused cohorts were compared with univariate analysis. Results: A total of 86 separate instances of spondylolisthesis were identified, of which 18 (20.9%) had radiological evidence of spontaneous fusion. The most common site of fusion was in the bilateral facets, followed by directly in the intervertebral disc space, and bridging osteophytes adjoining the vertebral bodies. There were significant differences between patients in the fused and nonfused cohorts in terms of average age (fused: 74.3 ± 10.7 yr vs. nonfused: 63.3 ± 18.6 yr, P = 0.019), sex (fused: 88.9% female vs. nonfused: 57.4% female, P = 0.013), and rate of pars defects (fused: 11.1% vs. nonfused: 35.3%, P = 0.047). Conclusion: In this study, 20.9% of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis have radiological signs of spontaneous fusion. Further work is needed to better characterize the natural history and clinical-radiological correlation of spontaneous fusion in spondylolisthesis.

KW - Lumbar spondylolisthesis

KW - Natural history

KW - Spinal autofusion

KW - Spontaneous arthrodesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921964879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921964879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000212

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000212

M3 - Article

C2 - 24430714

AN - SCOPUS:84921964879

VL - 39

SP - 656

EP - 663

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 8

ER -