Radiology curriculum for medical students: Clinicians' perspectives

R. M. Subramaniam, J. Sherriff, K. Holmes, M. C. Chan, B. Shadbolt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was conducted to establish clinicians' perspectives of a set of radiology curriculum topics for medical student teaching, which were held to be important by radiologists. A questionnaire was sent to clinicians in all specialties. Forty-six clinicians (51.1%) out of 90 returned the questionnaires. All curriculum topics were scored above an average of 4 (agree). The five highest ranking curriculum topics in order of importance were: developing a system for viewing chest radiographs (5.59), developing a system for viewing abdominal radiographs (5.56), developing a system for viewing bone and joint radiographs (5.33), distinguishing normal structures from abnormal in chest and abdominal radiographs (5.33) and identifying gross bone or joint abnormalities in skeletal radiographs (5.22). Correlative analysis between speciality groups showed surgical and medical specialities were significantly different in their responses of two learning outcomes: basic knowledge about the contrast media benefits and risks (P = 0.01) and ability to select the most appropriate and the most cost-effective methods of radiological investigations for clinical situations (P = 0.03). Acute specialities were not significantly different from the other two groups for these two learning outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference for other learning outcomes between the three speciality groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-446
Number of pages5
JournalAustralasian Radiology
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2006

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Radiology
Curriculum
Learning
Thorax
Joints
Bone and Bones
Aptitude
Contrast Media
Teaching
Medicine
Costs and Cost Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Curriculum topic
  • Medical student education
  • Radiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Radiology curriculum for medical students : Clinicians' perspectives. / Subramaniam, R. M.; Sherriff, J.; Holmes, K.; Chan, M. C.; Shadbolt, B.

In: Australasian Radiology, Vol. 50, No. 5, 01.10.2006, p. 442-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Subramaniam, R. M. ; Sherriff, J. ; Holmes, K. ; Chan, M. C. ; Shadbolt, B. / Radiology curriculum for medical students : Clinicians' perspectives. In: Australasian Radiology. 2006 ; Vol. 50, No. 5. pp. 442-446.
@article{3ff5022666b146999ce7170186fe8602,
title = "Radiology curriculum for medical students: Clinicians' perspectives",
abstract = "This study was conducted to establish clinicians' perspectives of a set of radiology curriculum topics for medical student teaching, which were held to be important by radiologists. A questionnaire was sent to clinicians in all specialties. Forty-six clinicians (51.1{\%}) out of 90 returned the questionnaires. All curriculum topics were scored above an average of 4 (agree). The five highest ranking curriculum topics in order of importance were: developing a system for viewing chest radiographs (5.59), developing a system for viewing abdominal radiographs (5.56), developing a system for viewing bone and joint radiographs (5.33), distinguishing normal structures from abnormal in chest and abdominal radiographs (5.33) and identifying gross bone or joint abnormalities in skeletal radiographs (5.22). Correlative analysis between speciality groups showed surgical and medical specialities were significantly different in their responses of two learning outcomes: basic knowledge about the contrast media benefits and risks (P = 0.01) and ability to select the most appropriate and the most cost-effective methods of radiological investigations for clinical situations (P = 0.03). Acute specialities were not significantly different from the other two groups for these two learning outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference for other learning outcomes between the three speciality groups.",
keywords = "Curriculum topic, Medical student education, Radiology",
author = "Subramaniam, {R. M.} and J. Sherriff and K. Holmes and Chan, {M. C.} and B. Shadbolt",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01620.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "442--446",
journal = "Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology",
issn = "1754-9477",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiology curriculum for medical students

T2 - Clinicians' perspectives

AU - Subramaniam, R. M.

AU - Sherriff, J.

AU - Holmes, K.

AU - Chan, M. C.

AU - Shadbolt, B.

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

N2 - This study was conducted to establish clinicians' perspectives of a set of radiology curriculum topics for medical student teaching, which were held to be important by radiologists. A questionnaire was sent to clinicians in all specialties. Forty-six clinicians (51.1%) out of 90 returned the questionnaires. All curriculum topics were scored above an average of 4 (agree). The five highest ranking curriculum topics in order of importance were: developing a system for viewing chest radiographs (5.59), developing a system for viewing abdominal radiographs (5.56), developing a system for viewing bone and joint radiographs (5.33), distinguishing normal structures from abnormal in chest and abdominal radiographs (5.33) and identifying gross bone or joint abnormalities in skeletal radiographs (5.22). Correlative analysis between speciality groups showed surgical and medical specialities were significantly different in their responses of two learning outcomes: basic knowledge about the contrast media benefits and risks (P = 0.01) and ability to select the most appropriate and the most cost-effective methods of radiological investigations for clinical situations (P = 0.03). Acute specialities were not significantly different from the other two groups for these two learning outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference for other learning outcomes between the three speciality groups.

AB - This study was conducted to establish clinicians' perspectives of a set of radiology curriculum topics for medical student teaching, which were held to be important by radiologists. A questionnaire was sent to clinicians in all specialties. Forty-six clinicians (51.1%) out of 90 returned the questionnaires. All curriculum topics were scored above an average of 4 (agree). The five highest ranking curriculum topics in order of importance were: developing a system for viewing chest radiographs (5.59), developing a system for viewing abdominal radiographs (5.56), developing a system for viewing bone and joint radiographs (5.33), distinguishing normal structures from abnormal in chest and abdominal radiographs (5.33) and identifying gross bone or joint abnormalities in skeletal radiographs (5.22). Correlative analysis between speciality groups showed surgical and medical specialities were significantly different in their responses of two learning outcomes: basic knowledge about the contrast media benefits and risks (P = 0.01) and ability to select the most appropriate and the most cost-effective methods of radiological investigations for clinical situations (P = 0.03). Acute specialities were not significantly different from the other two groups for these two learning outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference for other learning outcomes between the three speciality groups.

KW - Curriculum topic

KW - Medical student education

KW - Radiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748650574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748650574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01620.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01620.x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16981940

AN - SCOPUS:33748650574

VL - 50

SP - 442

EP - 446

JO - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

JF - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

SN - 1754-9477

IS - 5

ER -