Randomized controlled trial of supplemental augmentative and alternative communication versus voice rest alone after phonomicrosurgery

Bernard Rousseau, Michelle L. Gutmann, Theodore Mau, David O. Francis, Jeffrey P. Johnson, Carolyn K. Novaleski, Kimberly N. Vinson, C. Gaelyn Garrett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This randomized trial investigated voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication versus voice rest alone on visual analog scale measures of communication effectiveness and magnitude of voice use.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.

SETTING: Multicenter outpatient voice clinics.

SUBJECTS: Thirty-seven patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery.

METHODS: Patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery were randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication or voice rest alone. The primary outcome measure was the impact of voice rest on ability to communicate effectively over a 7-day period. Pre- and postoperative magnitude of voice use was also measured as an observational outcome.

RESULTS: Patients randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication reported higher median communication effectiveness on each postoperative day compared to those randomized to voice rest alone, with significantly higher median communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 (P=.03) and 5 (P=.01). Magnitude of voice use did not differ on any preoperative (P>.05) or postoperative day (P>.05), nor did patients significantly decrease voice use as the surgery date approached (P>.05). However, there was a significant reduction in median voice use pre- to postoperatively across patients (P

CONCLUSION: Supplemental text-to-speech communication increased patient-perceived communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 and 5 over voice rest alone. With the prevalence of smartphones and the widespread use of text messaging, supplemental text-to-speech communication may provide an accessible and cost-effective communication option for patients on vocal restrictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)494-500
Number of pages7
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
Volume152
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Communication
Text Messaging
Aptitude
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Visual Analog Scale
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • augmentative and alternative communication
  • randomized controlled trial
  • text-to-speech
  • voice
  • voice disorders
  • voice rest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Randomized controlled trial of supplemental augmentative and alternative communication versus voice rest alone after phonomicrosurgery. / Rousseau, Bernard; Gutmann, Michelle L.; Mau, Theodore; Francis, David O.; Johnson, Jeffrey P.; Novaleski, Carolyn K.; Vinson, Kimberly N.; Garrett, C. Gaelyn.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), Vol. 152, No. 3, 01.03.2015, p. 494-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rousseau, Bernard ; Gutmann, Michelle L. ; Mau, Theodore ; Francis, David O. ; Johnson, Jeffrey P. ; Novaleski, Carolyn K. ; Vinson, Kimberly N. ; Garrett, C. Gaelyn. / Randomized controlled trial of supplemental augmentative and alternative communication versus voice rest alone after phonomicrosurgery. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). 2015 ; Vol. 152, No. 3. pp. 494-500.
@article{b111b447495c463888e5e4b4ab92e175,
title = "Randomized controlled trial of supplemental augmentative and alternative communication versus voice rest alone after phonomicrosurgery",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: This randomized trial investigated voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication versus voice rest alone on visual analog scale measures of communication effectiveness and magnitude of voice use.STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.SETTING: Multicenter outpatient voice clinics.SUBJECTS: Thirty-seven patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery.METHODS: Patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery were randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication or voice rest alone. The primary outcome measure was the impact of voice rest on ability to communicate effectively over a 7-day period. Pre- and postoperative magnitude of voice use was also measured as an observational outcome.RESULTS: Patients randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication reported higher median communication effectiveness on each postoperative day compared to those randomized to voice rest alone, with significantly higher median communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 (P=.03) and 5 (P=.01). Magnitude of voice use did not differ on any preoperative (P>.05) or postoperative day (P>.05), nor did patients significantly decrease voice use as the surgery date approached (P>.05). However, there was a significant reduction in median voice use pre- to postoperatively across patients (PCONCLUSION: Supplemental text-to-speech communication increased patient-perceived communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 and 5 over voice rest alone. With the prevalence of smartphones and the widespread use of text messaging, supplemental text-to-speech communication may provide an accessible and cost-effective communication option for patients on vocal restrictions.",
keywords = "augmentative and alternative communication, randomized controlled trial, text-to-speech, voice, voice disorders, voice rest",
author = "Bernard Rousseau and Gutmann, {Michelle L.} and Theodore Mau and Francis, {David O.} and Johnson, {Jeffrey P.} and Novaleski, {Carolyn K.} and Vinson, {Kimberly N.} and Garrett, {C. Gaelyn}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0194599814566601",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "152",
pages = "494--500",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized controlled trial of supplemental augmentative and alternative communication versus voice rest alone after phonomicrosurgery

AU - Rousseau, Bernard

AU - Gutmann, Michelle L.

AU - Mau, Theodore

AU - Francis, David O.

AU - Johnson, Jeffrey P.

AU - Novaleski, Carolyn K.

AU - Vinson, Kimberly N.

AU - Garrett, C. Gaelyn

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: This randomized trial investigated voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication versus voice rest alone on visual analog scale measures of communication effectiveness and magnitude of voice use.STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.SETTING: Multicenter outpatient voice clinics.SUBJECTS: Thirty-seven patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery.METHODS: Patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery were randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication or voice rest alone. The primary outcome measure was the impact of voice rest on ability to communicate effectively over a 7-day period. Pre- and postoperative magnitude of voice use was also measured as an observational outcome.RESULTS: Patients randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication reported higher median communication effectiveness on each postoperative day compared to those randomized to voice rest alone, with significantly higher median communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 (P=.03) and 5 (P=.01). Magnitude of voice use did not differ on any preoperative (P>.05) or postoperative day (P>.05), nor did patients significantly decrease voice use as the surgery date approached (P>.05). However, there was a significant reduction in median voice use pre- to postoperatively across patients (PCONCLUSION: Supplemental text-to-speech communication increased patient-perceived communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 and 5 over voice rest alone. With the prevalence of smartphones and the widespread use of text messaging, supplemental text-to-speech communication may provide an accessible and cost-effective communication option for patients on vocal restrictions.

AB - OBJECTIVE: This randomized trial investigated voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication versus voice rest alone on visual analog scale measures of communication effectiveness and magnitude of voice use.STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.SETTING: Multicenter outpatient voice clinics.SUBJECTS: Thirty-seven patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery.METHODS: Patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery were randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication or voice rest alone. The primary outcome measure was the impact of voice rest on ability to communicate effectively over a 7-day period. Pre- and postoperative magnitude of voice use was also measured as an observational outcome.RESULTS: Patients randomized to voice rest and supplemental text-to-speech communication reported higher median communication effectiveness on each postoperative day compared to those randomized to voice rest alone, with significantly higher median communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 (P=.03) and 5 (P=.01). Magnitude of voice use did not differ on any preoperative (P>.05) or postoperative day (P>.05), nor did patients significantly decrease voice use as the surgery date approached (P>.05). However, there was a significant reduction in median voice use pre- to postoperatively across patients (PCONCLUSION: Supplemental text-to-speech communication increased patient-perceived communication effectiveness on postoperative days 3 and 5 over voice rest alone. With the prevalence of smartphones and the widespread use of text messaging, supplemental text-to-speech communication may provide an accessible and cost-effective communication option for patients on vocal restrictions.

KW - augmentative and alternative communication

KW - randomized controlled trial

KW - text-to-speech

KW - voice

KW - voice disorders

KW - voice rest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965191756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965191756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0194599814566601

DO - 10.1177/0194599814566601

M3 - Article

C2 - 25605690

AN - SCOPUS:84965191756

VL - 152

SP - 494

EP - 500

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 3

ER -