Randomized study of colonoscopic biopsy forceps: Influence of forceps characteristics on tissue specimens

K. L. Woods, B. S. Anand, R. Cole, D. M. Killip, A. Ertan, M. S. Osato, R. M. Genta, H. M. Malaty, I. E. Gurer, D. Deross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: A variety of biopsy forceps, both disposable and reusable varieties, are commercially available. Little is known whether forceps characteristics such as disposability, size, shape or presence of a needle have any influence on the adequacy of the tissue specimens. Objectives To analyze prospectively in a randomized, pathologist blinded study the performance of different biopsy forceps, both disposable and reusable. Methodology Six biopsy forceps were tested: Bard disposable forceps (cup size 3.1 mm), oval-shaped, with and without a needle, and alligator-shaped, with and without a needle, Microvasive disposable alligator-shaped forceps without a needle (cup size 3.3 mm) and an Olympus reusable oval shaped forceps with a needle (cup size 3.7 mm). Two biopsy specimens were obtained with each forceps: 12 specimens per patient. All biopsies were obtained by 3 endoscopists. Biopsies were examined in a blinded fashion for: weight (mg), dimensions (mm3), depth, crush artefact, shearing effect, and adequacy of specimens for histological information (0 = inadequate, 1 = suboptimal, 2 = adequate). Results: 25 patients were studied. Specimens from reusable forceps and disposable alligator cup without needle were inferior in weight (p<0.001), size (p=0.004) and depth (p <0.001) compared to disposable forceps. Bard disposable forceps provided specimens that were deeper and larger (p<0.01) but had more crush effect than other forceps. However, when the tissue specimens were analyzed for adequacy of histological information, the only factor which influenced the results was the cup shape; oval cup forceps were significantly better than alligator cup forceps (p=0.01). Conclusion: The present study shows that oval forceps provided the best results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume45
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Surgical Instruments
Biopsy
Alligators and Crocodiles
Needles
Weights and Measures
Artifacts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Woods, K. L., Anand, B. S., Cole, R., Killip, D. M., Ertan, A., Osato, M. S., ... Deross, D. (1997). Randomized study of colonoscopic biopsy forceps: Influence of forceps characteristics on tissue specimens. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 45(4).

Randomized study of colonoscopic biopsy forceps : Influence of forceps characteristics on tissue specimens. / Woods, K. L.; Anand, B. S.; Cole, R.; Killip, D. M.; Ertan, A.; Osato, M. S.; Genta, R. M.; Malaty, H. M.; Gurer, I. E.; Deross, D.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 45, No. 4, 1997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woods, KL, Anand, BS, Cole, R, Killip, DM, Ertan, A, Osato, MS, Genta, RM, Malaty, HM, Gurer, IE & Deross, D 1997, 'Randomized study of colonoscopic biopsy forceps: Influence of forceps characteristics on tissue specimens', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 45, no. 4.
Woods, K. L. ; Anand, B. S. ; Cole, R. ; Killip, D. M. ; Ertan, A. ; Osato, M. S. ; Genta, R. M. ; Malaty, H. M. ; Gurer, I. E. ; Deross, D. / Randomized study of colonoscopic biopsy forceps : Influence of forceps characteristics on tissue specimens. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1997 ; Vol. 45, No. 4.
@article{dc4ffb833ddc41b9ba7e5d962bdcab2d,
title = "Randomized study of colonoscopic biopsy forceps: Influence of forceps characteristics on tissue specimens",
abstract = "Background: A variety of biopsy forceps, both disposable and reusable varieties, are commercially available. Little is known whether forceps characteristics such as disposability, size, shape or presence of a needle have any influence on the adequacy of the tissue specimens. Objectives To analyze prospectively in a randomized, pathologist blinded study the performance of different biopsy forceps, both disposable and reusable. Methodology Six biopsy forceps were tested: Bard disposable forceps (cup size 3.1 mm), oval-shaped, with and without a needle, and alligator-shaped, with and without a needle, Microvasive disposable alligator-shaped forceps without a needle (cup size 3.3 mm) and an Olympus reusable oval shaped forceps with a needle (cup size 3.7 mm). Two biopsy specimens were obtained with each forceps: 12 specimens per patient. All biopsies were obtained by 3 endoscopists. Biopsies were examined in a blinded fashion for: weight (mg), dimensions (mm3), depth, crush artefact, shearing effect, and adequacy of specimens for histological information (0 = inadequate, 1 = suboptimal, 2 = adequate). Results: 25 patients were studied. Specimens from reusable forceps and disposable alligator cup without needle were inferior in weight (p<0.001), size (p=0.004) and depth (p <0.001) compared to disposable forceps. Bard disposable forceps provided specimens that were deeper and larger (p<0.01) but had more crush effect than other forceps. However, when the tissue specimens were analyzed for adequacy of histological information, the only factor which influenced the results was the cup shape; oval cup forceps were significantly better than alligator cup forceps (p=0.01). Conclusion: The present study shows that oval forceps provided the best results.",
author = "Woods, {K. L.} and Anand, {B. S.} and R. Cole and Killip, {D. M.} and A. Ertan and Osato, {M. S.} and Genta, {R. M.} and Malaty, {H. M.} and Gurer, {I. E.} and D. Deross",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized study of colonoscopic biopsy forceps

T2 - Influence of forceps characteristics on tissue specimens

AU - Woods, K. L.

AU - Anand, B. S.

AU - Cole, R.

AU - Killip, D. M.

AU - Ertan, A.

AU - Osato, M. S.

AU - Genta, R. M.

AU - Malaty, H. M.

AU - Gurer, I. E.

AU - Deross, D.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Background: A variety of biopsy forceps, both disposable and reusable varieties, are commercially available. Little is known whether forceps characteristics such as disposability, size, shape or presence of a needle have any influence on the adequacy of the tissue specimens. Objectives To analyze prospectively in a randomized, pathologist blinded study the performance of different biopsy forceps, both disposable and reusable. Methodology Six biopsy forceps were tested: Bard disposable forceps (cup size 3.1 mm), oval-shaped, with and without a needle, and alligator-shaped, with and without a needle, Microvasive disposable alligator-shaped forceps without a needle (cup size 3.3 mm) and an Olympus reusable oval shaped forceps with a needle (cup size 3.7 mm). Two biopsy specimens were obtained with each forceps: 12 specimens per patient. All biopsies were obtained by 3 endoscopists. Biopsies were examined in a blinded fashion for: weight (mg), dimensions (mm3), depth, crush artefact, shearing effect, and adequacy of specimens for histological information (0 = inadequate, 1 = suboptimal, 2 = adequate). Results: 25 patients were studied. Specimens from reusable forceps and disposable alligator cup without needle were inferior in weight (p<0.001), size (p=0.004) and depth (p <0.001) compared to disposable forceps. Bard disposable forceps provided specimens that were deeper and larger (p<0.01) but had more crush effect than other forceps. However, when the tissue specimens were analyzed for adequacy of histological information, the only factor which influenced the results was the cup shape; oval cup forceps were significantly better than alligator cup forceps (p=0.01). Conclusion: The present study shows that oval forceps provided the best results.

AB - Background: A variety of biopsy forceps, both disposable and reusable varieties, are commercially available. Little is known whether forceps characteristics such as disposability, size, shape or presence of a needle have any influence on the adequacy of the tissue specimens. Objectives To analyze prospectively in a randomized, pathologist blinded study the performance of different biopsy forceps, both disposable and reusable. Methodology Six biopsy forceps were tested: Bard disposable forceps (cup size 3.1 mm), oval-shaped, with and without a needle, and alligator-shaped, with and without a needle, Microvasive disposable alligator-shaped forceps without a needle (cup size 3.3 mm) and an Olympus reusable oval shaped forceps with a needle (cup size 3.7 mm). Two biopsy specimens were obtained with each forceps: 12 specimens per patient. All biopsies were obtained by 3 endoscopists. Biopsies were examined in a blinded fashion for: weight (mg), dimensions (mm3), depth, crush artefact, shearing effect, and adequacy of specimens for histological information (0 = inadequate, 1 = suboptimal, 2 = adequate). Results: 25 patients were studied. Specimens from reusable forceps and disposable alligator cup without needle were inferior in weight (p<0.001), size (p=0.004) and depth (p <0.001) compared to disposable forceps. Bard disposable forceps provided specimens that were deeper and larger (p<0.01) but had more crush effect than other forceps. However, when the tissue specimens were analyzed for adequacy of histological information, the only factor which influenced the results was the cup shape; oval cup forceps were significantly better than alligator cup forceps (p=0.01). Conclusion: The present study shows that oval forceps provided the best results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748982377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748982377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748982377

VL - 45

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -