Re: A prospective, randomized, single-blind trial of 5-mm versus 3-mm ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is smaller better?: Editorial comment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1813
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume191
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{34164659847845308305a7ebe1e5934c,
title = "Re: A prospective, randomized, single-blind trial of 5-mm versus 3-mm ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is smaller better?: Editorial comment",
author = "Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "1813",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re

T2 - A prospective, randomized, single-blind trial of 5-mm versus 3-mm ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is smaller better?: Editorial comment

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908208444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908208444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 25280294

AN - SCOPUS:84908208444

VL - 191

SP - 1813

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 6

ER -