Reactive Case Detection for Malaria Elimination

Real-Life Experience from an Ongoing Program in Swaziland

Hugh J W Sturrock, Joe M. Novotny, Simon Kunene, Sabelo Dlamini, Zulisile Zulu, Justin M. Cohen, Michelle S. Hsiang, Bryan Greenhouse, Roly D. Gosling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As countries move towards malaria elimination, methods to identify infections among populations who do not seek treatment are required. Reactive case detection, whereby individuals living in close proximity to passively detected cases are screened and treated, is one approach being used by a number of countries including Swaziland. An outstanding issue is establishing the epidemiologically and operationally optimal screening radius around each passively detected index case. Using data collected between December 2009 and June 2012 from reactive case detection (RACD) activities in Swaziland, we evaluated the effect of screening radius and other risk factors on the probability of detecting cases by reactive case detection. Using satellite imagery, we also evaluated the household coverage achieved during reactive case detection. Over the study period, 250 cases triggered RACD, which identified a further 74 cases, showing the value of RACD over passive surveillance alone. Results suggest that the odds of detecting a case within the household of the index case were significantly higher than in neighbouring households (odds ratio (OR) 13, 95% CI 3.1-54.4). Furthermore, cases were more likely to be detected when RACD was conducted within a week of the index presenting at a health facility (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.1-66.4) and if the index household had not been sprayed with insecticide (OR sprayed vs not sprayed 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.46). The large number of households missed during RACD indicates that a 1 km screening radius may be impractical in such resource limited settings such as Swaziland. Future RACD in Swaziland could be made more effective by achieving high coverage amongst individuals located near to index cases and in areas where spraying has not been conducted. As well as allowing the programme to implement RACD more rapidly, this would help to more precisely define the optimal screening radius.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere63830
JournalPLoS One
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 20 2013

Fingerprint

Swaziland
life events
malaria
Malaria
Screening
Odds Ratio
households
Satellite Imagery
Satellite imagery
odds ratio
screening
Spraying
Insecticides
application coverage
Health Facilities
Health
Infection
spraying
Population
insecticides

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sturrock, H. J. W., Novotny, J. M., Kunene, S., Dlamini, S., Zulu, Z., Cohen, J. M., ... Gosling, R. D. (2013). Reactive Case Detection for Malaria Elimination: Real-Life Experience from an Ongoing Program in Swaziland. PLoS One, 8(5), [e63830]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063830

Reactive Case Detection for Malaria Elimination : Real-Life Experience from an Ongoing Program in Swaziland. / Sturrock, Hugh J W; Novotny, Joe M.; Kunene, Simon; Dlamini, Sabelo; Zulu, Zulisile; Cohen, Justin M.; Hsiang, Michelle S.; Greenhouse, Bryan; Gosling, Roly D.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 8, No. 5, e63830, 20.05.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sturrock, HJW, Novotny, JM, Kunene, S, Dlamini, S, Zulu, Z, Cohen, JM, Hsiang, MS, Greenhouse, B & Gosling, RD 2013, 'Reactive Case Detection for Malaria Elimination: Real-Life Experience from an Ongoing Program in Swaziland', PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 5, e63830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063830
Sturrock, Hugh J W ; Novotny, Joe M. ; Kunene, Simon ; Dlamini, Sabelo ; Zulu, Zulisile ; Cohen, Justin M. ; Hsiang, Michelle S. ; Greenhouse, Bryan ; Gosling, Roly D. / Reactive Case Detection for Malaria Elimination : Real-Life Experience from an Ongoing Program in Swaziland. In: PLoS One. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 5.
@article{bb6705601c1241c0bebe6e064bced2dc,
title = "Reactive Case Detection for Malaria Elimination: Real-Life Experience from an Ongoing Program in Swaziland",
abstract = "As countries move towards malaria elimination, methods to identify infections among populations who do not seek treatment are required. Reactive case detection, whereby individuals living in close proximity to passively detected cases are screened and treated, is one approach being used by a number of countries including Swaziland. An outstanding issue is establishing the epidemiologically and operationally optimal screening radius around each passively detected index case. Using data collected between December 2009 and June 2012 from reactive case detection (RACD) activities in Swaziland, we evaluated the effect of screening radius and other risk factors on the probability of detecting cases by reactive case detection. Using satellite imagery, we also evaluated the household coverage achieved during reactive case detection. Over the study period, 250 cases triggered RACD, which identified a further 74 cases, showing the value of RACD over passive surveillance alone. Results suggest that the odds of detecting a case within the household of the index case were significantly higher than in neighbouring households (odds ratio (OR) 13, 95{\%} CI 3.1-54.4). Furthermore, cases were more likely to be detected when RACD was conducted within a week of the index presenting at a health facility (OR 8.7, 95{\%} CI 1.1-66.4) and if the index household had not been sprayed with insecticide (OR sprayed vs not sprayed 0.11, 95{\%} CI 0.03-0.46). The large number of households missed during RACD indicates that a 1 km screening radius may be impractical in such resource limited settings such as Swaziland. Future RACD in Swaziland could be made more effective by achieving high coverage amongst individuals located near to index cases and in areas where spraying has not been conducted. As well as allowing the programme to implement RACD more rapidly, this would help to more precisely define the optimal screening radius.",
author = "Sturrock, {Hugh J W} and Novotny, {Joe M.} and Simon Kunene and Sabelo Dlamini and Zulisile Zulu and Cohen, {Justin M.} and Hsiang, {Michelle S.} and Bryan Greenhouse and Gosling, {Roly D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0063830",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reactive Case Detection for Malaria Elimination

T2 - Real-Life Experience from an Ongoing Program in Swaziland

AU - Sturrock, Hugh J W

AU - Novotny, Joe M.

AU - Kunene, Simon

AU - Dlamini, Sabelo

AU - Zulu, Zulisile

AU - Cohen, Justin M.

AU - Hsiang, Michelle S.

AU - Greenhouse, Bryan

AU - Gosling, Roly D.

PY - 2013/5/20

Y1 - 2013/5/20

N2 - As countries move towards malaria elimination, methods to identify infections among populations who do not seek treatment are required. Reactive case detection, whereby individuals living in close proximity to passively detected cases are screened and treated, is one approach being used by a number of countries including Swaziland. An outstanding issue is establishing the epidemiologically and operationally optimal screening radius around each passively detected index case. Using data collected between December 2009 and June 2012 from reactive case detection (RACD) activities in Swaziland, we evaluated the effect of screening radius and other risk factors on the probability of detecting cases by reactive case detection. Using satellite imagery, we also evaluated the household coverage achieved during reactive case detection. Over the study period, 250 cases triggered RACD, which identified a further 74 cases, showing the value of RACD over passive surveillance alone. Results suggest that the odds of detecting a case within the household of the index case were significantly higher than in neighbouring households (odds ratio (OR) 13, 95% CI 3.1-54.4). Furthermore, cases were more likely to be detected when RACD was conducted within a week of the index presenting at a health facility (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.1-66.4) and if the index household had not been sprayed with insecticide (OR sprayed vs not sprayed 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.46). The large number of households missed during RACD indicates that a 1 km screening radius may be impractical in such resource limited settings such as Swaziland. Future RACD in Swaziland could be made more effective by achieving high coverage amongst individuals located near to index cases and in areas where spraying has not been conducted. As well as allowing the programme to implement RACD more rapidly, this would help to more precisely define the optimal screening radius.

AB - As countries move towards malaria elimination, methods to identify infections among populations who do not seek treatment are required. Reactive case detection, whereby individuals living in close proximity to passively detected cases are screened and treated, is one approach being used by a number of countries including Swaziland. An outstanding issue is establishing the epidemiologically and operationally optimal screening radius around each passively detected index case. Using data collected between December 2009 and June 2012 from reactive case detection (RACD) activities in Swaziland, we evaluated the effect of screening radius and other risk factors on the probability of detecting cases by reactive case detection. Using satellite imagery, we also evaluated the household coverage achieved during reactive case detection. Over the study period, 250 cases triggered RACD, which identified a further 74 cases, showing the value of RACD over passive surveillance alone. Results suggest that the odds of detecting a case within the household of the index case were significantly higher than in neighbouring households (odds ratio (OR) 13, 95% CI 3.1-54.4). Furthermore, cases were more likely to be detected when RACD was conducted within a week of the index presenting at a health facility (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.1-66.4) and if the index household had not been sprayed with insecticide (OR sprayed vs not sprayed 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.46). The large number of households missed during RACD indicates that a 1 km screening radius may be impractical in such resource limited settings such as Swaziland. Future RACD in Swaziland could be made more effective by achieving high coverage amongst individuals located near to index cases and in areas where spraying has not been conducted. As well as allowing the programme to implement RACD more rapidly, this would help to more precisely define the optimal screening radius.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877893759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877893759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0063830

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0063830

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 5

M1 - e63830

ER -