Reactivity and unreliability of husbands as participant observers

Robin B. Jarrett, Rosemery O. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the reliability and reactivity of participant observation. Twelve couples engaged in two discussions in a laboratory, one on a conflict topic and one on a consensus topic. For the eight couples in the experimental sequences, a baseline discussion was followed by participant observation in which the husband recorded his wife's use of "I" while continuing to converse. The four couples in the control sequences conversed without participant observation. Compared to observations made by a trained observer, the husbands were unreliable observers, underestimating their wives' use of "I." Participant observation was reactive (P<.01), with more wives decreasing their use of "I" in the experimental sequences than in the control sequences (p<.094). The topic of discussion did not differentially influence reliability or reactivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-145
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Behavioral Assessment
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1984

Fingerprint

Spouses
Observation
Consensus

Keywords

  • marital conflict
  • participant observation
  • reactivity
  • reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reactivity and unreliability of husbands as participant observers. / Jarrett, Robin B.; Nelson, Rosemery O.

In: Journal of Behavioral Assessment, Vol. 6, No. 2, 06.1984, p. 131-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b60f740b51514a18b9a6276a91b35314,
title = "Reactivity and unreliability of husbands as participant observers",
abstract = "This study examined the reliability and reactivity of participant observation. Twelve couples engaged in two discussions in a laboratory, one on a conflict topic and one on a consensus topic. For the eight couples in the experimental sequences, a baseline discussion was followed by participant observation in which the husband recorded his wife's use of {"}I{"} while continuing to converse. The four couples in the control sequences conversed without participant observation. Compared to observations made by a trained observer, the husbands were unreliable observers, underestimating their wives' use of {"}I.{"} Participant observation was reactive (P<.01), with more wives decreasing their use of {"}I{"} in the experimental sequences than in the control sequences (p<.094). The topic of discussion did not differentially influence reliability or reactivity.",
keywords = "marital conflict, participant observation, reactivity, reliability",
author = "Jarrett, {Robin B.} and Nelson, {Rosemery O.}",
year = "1984",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF01350168",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "131--145",
journal = "Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment",
issn = "0882-2689",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reactivity and unreliability of husbands as participant observers

AU - Jarrett, Robin B.

AU - Nelson, Rosemery O.

PY - 1984/6

Y1 - 1984/6

N2 - This study examined the reliability and reactivity of participant observation. Twelve couples engaged in two discussions in a laboratory, one on a conflict topic and one on a consensus topic. For the eight couples in the experimental sequences, a baseline discussion was followed by participant observation in which the husband recorded his wife's use of "I" while continuing to converse. The four couples in the control sequences conversed without participant observation. Compared to observations made by a trained observer, the husbands were unreliable observers, underestimating their wives' use of "I." Participant observation was reactive (P<.01), with more wives decreasing their use of "I" in the experimental sequences than in the control sequences (p<.094). The topic of discussion did not differentially influence reliability or reactivity.

AB - This study examined the reliability and reactivity of participant observation. Twelve couples engaged in two discussions in a laboratory, one on a conflict topic and one on a consensus topic. For the eight couples in the experimental sequences, a baseline discussion was followed by participant observation in which the husband recorded his wife's use of "I" while continuing to converse. The four couples in the control sequences conversed without participant observation. Compared to observations made by a trained observer, the husbands were unreliable observers, underestimating their wives' use of "I." Participant observation was reactive (P<.01), with more wives decreasing their use of "I" in the experimental sequences than in the control sequences (p<.094). The topic of discussion did not differentially influence reliability or reactivity.

KW - marital conflict

KW - participant observation

KW - reactivity

KW - reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021715824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021715824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01350168

DO - 10.1007/BF01350168

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 131

EP - 145

JO - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

JF - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

SN - 0882-2689

IS - 2

ER -