Real-world lessons from the implementation of a depression screening protocol in acute myocardial infarction patients implications for the american heart association depression screening advisory

Kim G. Smolderen, Donna M. Buchanan, Alpesh A. Amin, Kensey Gosch, Karen Nugent, Lisa Riggs, Geri Seavey, John A. Spertus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Scopus citations


Background: The American Heart Association (AHA) statement has recommended routine screening for depression in coronary artery disease with a 2-stage implementation of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)Because there is little evidence on feasibility, accuracy, and impact of such a program on depression recognition in coronary patients, the AHA recommendation has met substantial debate and criticismMethods and Results: Before the AHA statement was released, the Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute (MAHVI) had implemented a depression screening protocol for patients with acute myocardial infarction that was virtually identical to the AHA recommendationsTo (1) evaluate this MAHVI quality improvement initiative, (2) compare MAHVI depression recognition rates with those of other hospitals, and (3) examine health care providers' implementation feedback, we compared the results of the MAHVI screening program with data from a parallel prospective acute myocardial infarction registry and interviewed MAHVI providersDepressive symptoms (PHQ-2, PHQ-9) were assessed among 503 MAHVI acute myocardial infarction patients and compared with concurrent depression assessments among 3533 patients at 23 US centers without a screening protocolA qualitative summary of providers' suggestions for improvement was also generatedA total of 135 (26.8%) eligible MAHVI patients did not get screenedAmong screened patients, 90.9% depressed (PHQ-9 >10) patients were recognizedThe agreement between the screening and registry data using the full PHQ-9 was 61.5% for positive cases (PHQ-9 >0) but only 35.6% for the PHQ-2 aloneAlthough MAHVI had a slightly higher overall depression recognition rate (38.3%) than other centers not using a depression screening protocol (31.5%), the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.31)Staff feedback suggested that a single-stage screening protocol with continuous feedback could improve complianceConclusions: In this early effort to implement a depression screening protocol, a large proportion of patients did not get screened, and only a modest impact on depression recognition rates was realizedSimplifying the protocol by using the PHQ-9 alone and providing more support and feedback may improve the rates of depression detection and treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-292
Number of pages10
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - May 2011



  • AHA medical/scientific statements
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Patient centered care
  • Rrisk factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this