Reasoning and evidence-based medicine

Common pitfalls

Jai Varma, Rechell Rodriguez, Ishak A. Mansi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is impossible to answer every potential clinical question through randomized controlled trials. Hence, assumptions, rational thinking, logic, and reasoning are used in making recommendations; however, these methods may interfere with the judicious application of evidence-based medicine and, as discussed in this article, may result in logical fallacies. We also explain how we may incorporate recommendations based on assumptions and rational thinking in patient care. Extrapolations of study content and confusing association with causation are common pitfalls in the application of the evidence-based medicine process. Personal bias can be another barrier in the adoption of evidence-based medicine. It can be difficult to modify personal bias despite the evidence; keeping up with the medical literature in a busy practice can be daunting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-172
Number of pages6
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume105
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Medicine
Causality
Patient Care
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • association
  • causation
  • evidence-based medicine
  • extrapolation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reasoning and evidence-based medicine : Common pitfalls. / Varma, Jai; Rodriguez, Rechell; Mansi, Ishak A.

In: Southern Medical Journal, Vol. 105, No. 3, 01.03.2012, p. 167-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Varma, Jai ; Rodriguez, Rechell ; Mansi, Ishak A. / Reasoning and evidence-based medicine : Common pitfalls. In: Southern Medical Journal. 2012 ; Vol. 105, No. 3. pp. 167-172.
@article{7ecd9b2ee4044035b7673c99ee8cb3a6,
title = "Reasoning and evidence-based medicine: Common pitfalls",
abstract = "It is impossible to answer every potential clinical question through randomized controlled trials. Hence, assumptions, rational thinking, logic, and reasoning are used in making recommendations; however, these methods may interfere with the judicious application of evidence-based medicine and, as discussed in this article, may result in logical fallacies. We also explain how we may incorporate recommendations based on assumptions and rational thinking in patient care. Extrapolations of study content and confusing association with causation are common pitfalls in the application of the evidence-based medicine process. Personal bias can be another barrier in the adoption of evidence-based medicine. It can be difficult to modify personal bias despite the evidence; keeping up with the medical literature in a busy practice can be daunting.",
keywords = "association, causation, evidence-based medicine, extrapolation",
author = "Jai Varma and Rechell Rodriguez and Mansi, {Ishak A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31824ab448",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "167--172",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasoning and evidence-based medicine

T2 - Common pitfalls

AU - Varma, Jai

AU - Rodriguez, Rechell

AU - Mansi, Ishak A.

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - It is impossible to answer every potential clinical question through randomized controlled trials. Hence, assumptions, rational thinking, logic, and reasoning are used in making recommendations; however, these methods may interfere with the judicious application of evidence-based medicine and, as discussed in this article, may result in logical fallacies. We also explain how we may incorporate recommendations based on assumptions and rational thinking in patient care. Extrapolations of study content and confusing association with causation are common pitfalls in the application of the evidence-based medicine process. Personal bias can be another barrier in the adoption of evidence-based medicine. It can be difficult to modify personal bias despite the evidence; keeping up with the medical literature in a busy practice can be daunting.

AB - It is impossible to answer every potential clinical question through randomized controlled trials. Hence, assumptions, rational thinking, logic, and reasoning are used in making recommendations; however, these methods may interfere with the judicious application of evidence-based medicine and, as discussed in this article, may result in logical fallacies. We also explain how we may incorporate recommendations based on assumptions and rational thinking in patient care. Extrapolations of study content and confusing association with causation are common pitfalls in the application of the evidence-based medicine process. Personal bias can be another barrier in the adoption of evidence-based medicine. It can be difficult to modify personal bias despite the evidence; keeping up with the medical literature in a busy practice can be daunting.

KW - association

KW - causation

KW - evidence-based medicine

KW - extrapolation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858215625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858215625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31824ab448

DO - 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31824ab448

M3 - Review article

VL - 105

SP - 167

EP - 172

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 3

ER -