Reasoning and evidence-based medicine: Common pitfalls

Jai Varma, Rechell Rodriguez, Ishak A. Mansi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is impossible to answer every potential clinical question through randomized controlled trials. Hence, assumptions, rational thinking, logic, and reasoning are used in making recommendations; however, these methods may interfere with the judicious application of evidence-based medicine and, as discussed in this article, may result in logical fallacies. We also explain how we may incorporate recommendations based on assumptions and rational thinking in patient care. Extrapolations of study content and confusing association with causation are common pitfalls in the application of the evidence-based medicine process. Personal bias can be another barrier in the adoption of evidence-based medicine. It can be difficult to modify personal bias despite the evidence; keeping up with the medical literature in a busy practice can be daunting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-172
Number of pages6
JournalSouthern medical journal
Volume105
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Keywords

  • association
  • causation
  • evidence-based medicine
  • extrapolation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reasoning and evidence-based medicine: Common pitfalls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this