Reasons why trauma surgeons fail to screen for alcohol problems

Per E. Danielson, Frederick P. Rivara, Larry M. Gentilello, Ronald V. Maier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Alcohol screening and intervention have been recommended as routine components of trauma care but are rarely performed. Hypothesis: An association exists between current screening and counseling practices and the trauma surgeon's knowledge, attitude, and perceived role and responsibility toward alcohol problems. Participants: Random-sample survey (n = 241) of members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Main Outcome Measures: Reported screening and counseling practices. Results: Fifty-four percent of respondents screened 25% or fewer patients, while only 29% screened most patients. The most common reason for not screening was 'lack of time.' Most (76%) were not familiar with the most common clinically used screening questionnaires, and 83% reported no training in alcohol screening. Screening was more likely if attending physicians perceived a major responsibility for screening (P < .001). Nonscreeners were twice as likely to state screening was 'not what I was trained to do' and more frequently believed screening offends patients (P = .001). Independent predictors of screening were perceived major role responsibility (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.01) and confidence in screening ability (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.05-3.67) and counseling ability (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.34- 3.85). Eighty-eight percent of respondents would be willing to devote time to training if shown that counseling is effective. Conclusions: Lack of screening and counseling appears to be due to cognitive factors, not lack of motivation. Skills on how to screen and counsel for alcohol abuse should be taught to trauma surgeons, because a strong correlation exists between screening and confidence in skills. There is a need for education regarding results of effective intervention trials in medical settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)564-568
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume134
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1999

Fingerprint

Counseling
Alcohols
Wounds and Injuries
Aptitude
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Alcoholism
Motivation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surgeons
Physicians
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Reasons why trauma surgeons fail to screen for alcohol problems. / Danielson, Per E.; Rivara, Frederick P.; Gentilello, Larry M.; Maier, Ronald V.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 134, No. 5, 05.1999, p. 564-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Danielson, Per E. ; Rivara, Frederick P. ; Gentilello, Larry M. ; Maier, Ronald V. / Reasons why trauma surgeons fail to screen for alcohol problems. In: Archives of Surgery. 1999 ; Vol. 134, No. 5. pp. 564-568.
@article{df7cb00dbe69423ebced6dff2be7ec2c,
title = "Reasons why trauma surgeons fail to screen for alcohol problems",
abstract = "Background: Alcohol screening and intervention have been recommended as routine components of trauma care but are rarely performed. Hypothesis: An association exists between current screening and counseling practices and the trauma surgeon's knowledge, attitude, and perceived role and responsibility toward alcohol problems. Participants: Random-sample survey (n = 241) of members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Main Outcome Measures: Reported screening and counseling practices. Results: Fifty-four percent of respondents screened 25{\%} or fewer patients, while only 29{\%} screened most patients. The most common reason for not screening was 'lack of time.' Most (76{\%}) were not familiar with the most common clinically used screening questionnaires, and 83{\%} reported no training in alcohol screening. Screening was more likely if attending physicians perceived a major responsibility for screening (P < .001). Nonscreeners were twice as likely to state screening was 'not what I was trained to do' and more frequently believed screening offends patients (P = .001). Independent predictors of screening were perceived major role responsibility (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.01) and confidence in screening ability (OR, 1.96; 95{\%} CI, 1.05-3.67) and counseling ability (OR, 2.27; 95{\%} CI, 1.34- 3.85). Eighty-eight percent of respondents would be willing to devote time to training if shown that counseling is effective. Conclusions: Lack of screening and counseling appears to be due to cognitive factors, not lack of motivation. Skills on how to screen and counsel for alcohol abuse should be taught to trauma surgeons, because a strong correlation exists between screening and confidence in skills. There is a need for education regarding results of effective intervention trials in medical settings.",
author = "Danielson, {Per E.} and Rivara, {Frederick P.} and Gentilello, {Larry M.} and Maier, {Ronald V.}",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.134.5.564",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "564--568",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasons why trauma surgeons fail to screen for alcohol problems

AU - Danielson, Per E.

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

AU - Gentilello, Larry M.

AU - Maier, Ronald V.

PY - 1999/5

Y1 - 1999/5

N2 - Background: Alcohol screening and intervention have been recommended as routine components of trauma care but are rarely performed. Hypothesis: An association exists between current screening and counseling practices and the trauma surgeon's knowledge, attitude, and perceived role and responsibility toward alcohol problems. Participants: Random-sample survey (n = 241) of members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Main Outcome Measures: Reported screening and counseling practices. Results: Fifty-four percent of respondents screened 25% or fewer patients, while only 29% screened most patients. The most common reason for not screening was 'lack of time.' Most (76%) were not familiar with the most common clinically used screening questionnaires, and 83% reported no training in alcohol screening. Screening was more likely if attending physicians perceived a major responsibility for screening (P < .001). Nonscreeners were twice as likely to state screening was 'not what I was trained to do' and more frequently believed screening offends patients (P = .001). Independent predictors of screening were perceived major role responsibility (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.01) and confidence in screening ability (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.05-3.67) and counseling ability (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.34- 3.85). Eighty-eight percent of respondents would be willing to devote time to training if shown that counseling is effective. Conclusions: Lack of screening and counseling appears to be due to cognitive factors, not lack of motivation. Skills on how to screen and counsel for alcohol abuse should be taught to trauma surgeons, because a strong correlation exists between screening and confidence in skills. There is a need for education regarding results of effective intervention trials in medical settings.

AB - Background: Alcohol screening and intervention have been recommended as routine components of trauma care but are rarely performed. Hypothesis: An association exists between current screening and counseling practices and the trauma surgeon's knowledge, attitude, and perceived role and responsibility toward alcohol problems. Participants: Random-sample survey (n = 241) of members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Main Outcome Measures: Reported screening and counseling practices. Results: Fifty-four percent of respondents screened 25% or fewer patients, while only 29% screened most patients. The most common reason for not screening was 'lack of time.' Most (76%) were not familiar with the most common clinically used screening questionnaires, and 83% reported no training in alcohol screening. Screening was more likely if attending physicians perceived a major responsibility for screening (P < .001). Nonscreeners were twice as likely to state screening was 'not what I was trained to do' and more frequently believed screening offends patients (P = .001). Independent predictors of screening were perceived major role responsibility (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.01) and confidence in screening ability (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.05-3.67) and counseling ability (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.34- 3.85). Eighty-eight percent of respondents would be willing to devote time to training if shown that counseling is effective. Conclusions: Lack of screening and counseling appears to be due to cognitive factors, not lack of motivation. Skills on how to screen and counsel for alcohol abuse should be taught to trauma surgeons, because a strong correlation exists between screening and confidence in skills. There is a need for education regarding results of effective intervention trials in medical settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032912298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032912298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.134.5.564

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.134.5.564

M3 - Article

VL - 134

SP - 564

EP - 568

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 5

ER -