Recovery profiles and costs of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy

Dajun Song, Nancy B. Greilich, Paul F. White, Mehernoor F. Watcha, W. Kendall Tongier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

199 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of an ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block (IHNB) as part of a monitored anesthesia care (MAC) technique has been associated with a rapid recovery profile for outpatients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy procedures. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of an IHNB-MAC technique with standardized general and spinal anesthetics techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy in the ambulatory setting. We randomly assigned 81 consenting outpatients to receive IHNB-MAC, general anesthesia, or spinal anesthesia. We evaluated recovery times, 24-h postoperative side effects and associated incremental costs. Compared with general and spinal anesthesia, patients receiving IHNB-MAC had the shortest time-to-home readiness (133 ± 68 min vs 171 ± 40 and 280 ± 83 min), lowest pain score at discharge (15 ± 14 mm vs 39 ± 28 and 34 ± 32 mm), and highest satisfaction at 24-h follow-up (75% vs 36% and 64%). The total anesthetic costs were also the least in the IHNB-MAC group ($132.73 ± 33.80 vs $172.67 ± 29.82 and $164.97 ± 31.03). We concluded that IHNB-MAC is the most cost-effective anesthetic technique for outpatients undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy with respect to speed of recovery, patient comfort, and associated incremental costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)876-881
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume91
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Groin
Nerve Block
Herniorrhaphy
Outpatients
Anesthesia
Costs and Cost Analysis
Spinal Anesthesia
General Anesthesia
Anesthetics
General Anesthetics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Recovery profiles and costs of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. / Song, Dajun; Greilich, Nancy B.; White, Paul F.; Watcha, Mehernoor F.; Tongier, W. Kendall.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 91, No. 4, 2000, p. 876-881.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79c9c1388855467b90c701de7bd6043b,
title = "Recovery profiles and costs of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy",
abstract = "The use of an ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block (IHNB) as part of a monitored anesthesia care (MAC) technique has been associated with a rapid recovery profile for outpatients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy procedures. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of an IHNB-MAC technique with standardized general and spinal anesthetics techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy in the ambulatory setting. We randomly assigned 81 consenting outpatients to receive IHNB-MAC, general anesthesia, or spinal anesthesia. We evaluated recovery times, 24-h postoperative side effects and associated incremental costs. Compared with general and spinal anesthesia, patients receiving IHNB-MAC had the shortest time-to-home readiness (133 ± 68 min vs 171 ± 40 and 280 ± 83 min), lowest pain score at discharge (15 ± 14 mm vs 39 ± 28 and 34 ± 32 mm), and highest satisfaction at 24-h follow-up (75{\%} vs 36{\%} and 64{\%}). The total anesthetic costs were also the least in the IHNB-MAC group ($132.73 ± 33.80 vs $172.67 ± 29.82 and $164.97 ± 31.03). We concluded that IHNB-MAC is the most cost-effective anesthetic technique for outpatients undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy with respect to speed of recovery, patient comfort, and associated incremental costs.",
author = "Dajun Song and Greilich, {Nancy B.} and White, {Paul F.} and Watcha, {Mehernoor F.} and Tongier, {W. Kendall}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "876--881",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recovery profiles and costs of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy

AU - Song, Dajun

AU - Greilich, Nancy B.

AU - White, Paul F.

AU - Watcha, Mehernoor F.

AU - Tongier, W. Kendall

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The use of an ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block (IHNB) as part of a monitored anesthesia care (MAC) technique has been associated with a rapid recovery profile for outpatients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy procedures. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of an IHNB-MAC technique with standardized general and spinal anesthetics techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy in the ambulatory setting. We randomly assigned 81 consenting outpatients to receive IHNB-MAC, general anesthesia, or spinal anesthesia. We evaluated recovery times, 24-h postoperative side effects and associated incremental costs. Compared with general and spinal anesthesia, patients receiving IHNB-MAC had the shortest time-to-home readiness (133 ± 68 min vs 171 ± 40 and 280 ± 83 min), lowest pain score at discharge (15 ± 14 mm vs 39 ± 28 and 34 ± 32 mm), and highest satisfaction at 24-h follow-up (75% vs 36% and 64%). The total anesthetic costs were also the least in the IHNB-MAC group ($132.73 ± 33.80 vs $172.67 ± 29.82 and $164.97 ± 31.03). We concluded that IHNB-MAC is the most cost-effective anesthetic technique for outpatients undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy with respect to speed of recovery, patient comfort, and associated incremental costs.

AB - The use of an ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block (IHNB) as part of a monitored anesthesia care (MAC) technique has been associated with a rapid recovery profile for outpatients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy procedures. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of an IHNB-MAC technique with standardized general and spinal anesthetics techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy in the ambulatory setting. We randomly assigned 81 consenting outpatients to receive IHNB-MAC, general anesthesia, or spinal anesthesia. We evaluated recovery times, 24-h postoperative side effects and associated incremental costs. Compared with general and spinal anesthesia, patients receiving IHNB-MAC had the shortest time-to-home readiness (133 ± 68 min vs 171 ± 40 and 280 ± 83 min), lowest pain score at discharge (15 ± 14 mm vs 39 ± 28 and 34 ± 32 mm), and highest satisfaction at 24-h follow-up (75% vs 36% and 64%). The total anesthetic costs were also the least in the IHNB-MAC group ($132.73 ± 33.80 vs $172.67 ± 29.82 and $164.97 ± 31.03). We concluded that IHNB-MAC is the most cost-effective anesthetic technique for outpatients undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy with respect to speed of recovery, patient comfort, and associated incremental costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033799717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033799717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 876

EP - 881

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 4

ER -