Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot: A comparison of footwear

Lawrence A. Lavery, Steven A. Vela, John G. Fleischli, David G. Armstrong, David C. Lavery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

112 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - To compare the effectiveness of therapeutic, comfort, and athletic shoes with and without viscoelastic insoles. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We compared pressure reduction at ulcer sites under the hallux (n = 10), first metatarsal (n = 10), and lesser metatarsals (n = 12), using extra- depth, athletic, and comfort shoes with and without viscoelastic insoles. A rubber-soled canvas oxford was used to establish baseline pressure values. RESULTS - When used in conjunction with a viscoelastic insole, all shoe types reduced mean peak plantar pressure better than their non-insoled counterparts (P < 0.05). Consistently, comfort shoes reduced pressure significantly better than both the cross trainers and extra-depth shoes for ulcers under the first and lesser metatarsals (P < 0.05). For each shoe type, the addition of the viscoelastic insole provided a significant reduction in mean peak pressure (P < 0.05). Compared with stock insoles, viscoelastic insoles reduced pressures an additional 5.4-20.1% at ulcer sites. The same trend was also observed at regions of the foot not associated with an ulceration. CONCLUSIONS - When used in conjunction with a viscoelastic insole, both the comfort and athletic cross-trainer shoes studied were as, if not more, effective than commonly prescribed therapeutic shoes in reducing mean peak first and lesser metatarsal pressures. Furthermore, comfort shoes were as effective as therapeutic shoes in reducing pressure under the great toe. Both of these shoe types may be viable options to prevent the development or recurrence of foot ulcers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1706-1710
Number of pages5
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume20
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1997

Fingerprint

Shoes
Foot
Pressure
Metatarsal Bones
Hallux
Ulcer
Sports
Foot Ulcer
Rubber
Research Design
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Lavery, L. A., Vela, S. A., Fleischli, J. G., Armstrong, D. G., & Lavery, D. C. (1997). Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot: A comparison of footwear. Diabetes Care, 20(11), 1706-1710.

Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot : A comparison of footwear. / Lavery, Lawrence A.; Vela, Steven A.; Fleischli, John G.; Armstrong, David G.; Lavery, David C.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 20, No. 11, 11.1997, p. 1706-1710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lavery, LA, Vela, SA, Fleischli, JG, Armstrong, DG & Lavery, DC 1997, 'Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot: A comparison of footwear', Diabetes Care, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1706-1710.
Lavery LA, Vela SA, Fleischli JG, Armstrong DG, Lavery DC. Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot: A comparison of footwear. Diabetes Care. 1997 Nov;20(11):1706-1710.
Lavery, Lawrence A. ; Vela, Steven A. ; Fleischli, John G. ; Armstrong, David G. ; Lavery, David C. / Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot : A comparison of footwear. In: Diabetes Care. 1997 ; Vol. 20, No. 11. pp. 1706-1710.
@article{a4e017ba80614204b31801f3582844f7,
title = "Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot: A comparison of footwear",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE - To compare the effectiveness of therapeutic, comfort, and athletic shoes with and without viscoelastic insoles. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We compared pressure reduction at ulcer sites under the hallux (n = 10), first metatarsal (n = 10), and lesser metatarsals (n = 12), using extra- depth, athletic, and comfort shoes with and without viscoelastic insoles. A rubber-soled canvas oxford was used to establish baseline pressure values. RESULTS - When used in conjunction with a viscoelastic insole, all shoe types reduced mean peak plantar pressure better than their non-insoled counterparts (P < 0.05). Consistently, comfort shoes reduced pressure significantly better than both the cross trainers and extra-depth shoes for ulcers under the first and lesser metatarsals (P < 0.05). For each shoe type, the addition of the viscoelastic insole provided a significant reduction in mean peak pressure (P < 0.05). Compared with stock insoles, viscoelastic insoles reduced pressures an additional 5.4-20.1{\%} at ulcer sites. The same trend was also observed at regions of the foot not associated with an ulceration. CONCLUSIONS - When used in conjunction with a viscoelastic insole, both the comfort and athletic cross-trainer shoes studied were as, if not more, effective than commonly prescribed therapeutic shoes in reducing mean peak first and lesser metatarsal pressures. Furthermore, comfort shoes were as effective as therapeutic shoes in reducing pressure under the great toe. Both of these shoe types may be viable options to prevent the development or recurrence of foot ulcers.",
author = "Lavery, {Lawrence A.} and Vela, {Steven A.} and Fleischli, {John G.} and Armstrong, {David G.} and Lavery, {David C.}",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1706--1710",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot

T2 - A comparison of footwear

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

AU - Vela, Steven A.

AU - Fleischli, John G.

AU - Armstrong, David G.

AU - Lavery, David C.

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE - To compare the effectiveness of therapeutic, comfort, and athletic shoes with and without viscoelastic insoles. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We compared pressure reduction at ulcer sites under the hallux (n = 10), first metatarsal (n = 10), and lesser metatarsals (n = 12), using extra- depth, athletic, and comfort shoes with and without viscoelastic insoles. A rubber-soled canvas oxford was used to establish baseline pressure values. RESULTS - When used in conjunction with a viscoelastic insole, all shoe types reduced mean peak plantar pressure better than their non-insoled counterparts (P < 0.05). Consistently, comfort shoes reduced pressure significantly better than both the cross trainers and extra-depth shoes for ulcers under the first and lesser metatarsals (P < 0.05). For each shoe type, the addition of the viscoelastic insole provided a significant reduction in mean peak pressure (P < 0.05). Compared with stock insoles, viscoelastic insoles reduced pressures an additional 5.4-20.1% at ulcer sites. The same trend was also observed at regions of the foot not associated with an ulceration. CONCLUSIONS - When used in conjunction with a viscoelastic insole, both the comfort and athletic cross-trainer shoes studied were as, if not more, effective than commonly prescribed therapeutic shoes in reducing mean peak first and lesser metatarsal pressures. Furthermore, comfort shoes were as effective as therapeutic shoes in reducing pressure under the great toe. Both of these shoe types may be viable options to prevent the development or recurrence of foot ulcers.

AB - OBJECTIVE - To compare the effectiveness of therapeutic, comfort, and athletic shoes with and without viscoelastic insoles. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We compared pressure reduction at ulcer sites under the hallux (n = 10), first metatarsal (n = 10), and lesser metatarsals (n = 12), using extra- depth, athletic, and comfort shoes with and without viscoelastic insoles. A rubber-soled canvas oxford was used to establish baseline pressure values. RESULTS - When used in conjunction with a viscoelastic insole, all shoe types reduced mean peak plantar pressure better than their non-insoled counterparts (P < 0.05). Consistently, comfort shoes reduced pressure significantly better than both the cross trainers and extra-depth shoes for ulcers under the first and lesser metatarsals (P < 0.05). For each shoe type, the addition of the viscoelastic insole provided a significant reduction in mean peak pressure (P < 0.05). Compared with stock insoles, viscoelastic insoles reduced pressures an additional 5.4-20.1% at ulcer sites. The same trend was also observed at regions of the foot not associated with an ulceration. CONCLUSIONS - When used in conjunction with a viscoelastic insole, both the comfort and athletic cross-trainer shoes studied were as, if not more, effective than commonly prescribed therapeutic shoes in reducing mean peak first and lesser metatarsal pressures. Furthermore, comfort shoes were as effective as therapeutic shoes in reducing pressure under the great toe. Both of these shoe types may be viable options to prevent the development or recurrence of foot ulcers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030732543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030732543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9353613

AN - SCOPUS:0030732543

VL - 20

SP - 1706

EP - 1710

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 11

ER -