Relationship between patient-perceived vocal handicap and clinician-Rated level of vocal dysfunction

Lesley F. Childs, Clifford Bielinski, Laura Toles, Amy Hamilton, Janis Deane, Ted Mau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: Four hundred and nine voice evaluations over 12 months at a tertiary voice center were reviewed. The VHI-10 and NOMS scores, diagnoses, and potential comorbid factors were collected and analyzed.

Results: For the study population as a whole, there was a moderate negative correlation between the NOMS rating and the VHI-10 (Pearson r520.57). However, for a given NOMS level, there could be considerable spread in the VHI-10. In addition, as the NOMS decreased stepwise below level 4, there was a corresponding increase in the VHI-10. However, a similar trend in VHI-10 was not observed for NOMS above level 4, indicating the NOMS versus VHI-10 correlation was not linear. Among diagnostic groups, the strongest correlation was found for subjects with functional dysphonia. The NOMS versus VHI-10 correlation was not affected by gender or the coexistence of a psychiatric diagnosis.

Conclusions: A simple relationship between VHI-10 and NOMS rating does not exist. Patients with mild vocal dysfunction have a less direct relationship between their NOMS ratings and the VHI-10. These findings provide insight into the interpretation of patient-perceived and clinician-rated measures of vocal function and may allow for better management of expectations and patient counseling in the treatment of voice disorders.

Objectives/Hypothesis: The relationship between patient-reported vocal handicap and clinician-rated measures of vocal dysfunction is not understood. This study aimed to determine if a correlation exists between the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and the Voice Functional Communication Measure rating in the National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-185
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume125
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Voice Disorders
Dysphonia
Mental Disorders
Counseling
Retrospective Studies
Communication
Population
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Dysphonia
  • Patient perception
  • Quality of life
  • Vocal function
  • Voice assessment
  • Voice handicap
  • Voice Handicap Index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Relationship between patient-perceived vocal handicap and clinician-Rated level of vocal dysfunction. / Childs, Lesley F.; Bielinski, Clifford; Toles, Laura; Hamilton, Amy; Deane, Janis; Mau, Ted.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 125, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 180-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Childs, Lesley F. ; Bielinski, Clifford ; Toles, Laura ; Hamilton, Amy ; Deane, Janis ; Mau, Ted. / Relationship between patient-perceived vocal handicap and clinician-Rated level of vocal dysfunction. In: Laryngoscope. 2015 ; Vol. 125, No. 1. pp. 180-185.
@article{6cfcf755d0f94d408accd38895469e73,
title = "Relationship between patient-perceived vocal handicap and clinician-Rated level of vocal dysfunction",
abstract = "Study Design: Retrospective case series.Methods: Four hundred and nine voice evaluations over 12 months at a tertiary voice center were reviewed. The VHI-10 and NOMS scores, diagnoses, and potential comorbid factors were collected and analyzed.Results: For the study population as a whole, there was a moderate negative correlation between the NOMS rating and the VHI-10 (Pearson r520.57). However, for a given NOMS level, there could be considerable spread in the VHI-10. In addition, as the NOMS decreased stepwise below level 4, there was a corresponding increase in the VHI-10. However, a similar trend in VHI-10 was not observed for NOMS above level 4, indicating the NOMS versus VHI-10 correlation was not linear. Among diagnostic groups, the strongest correlation was found for subjects with functional dysphonia. The NOMS versus VHI-10 correlation was not affected by gender or the coexistence of a psychiatric diagnosis.Conclusions: A simple relationship between VHI-10 and NOMS rating does not exist. Patients with mild vocal dysfunction have a less direct relationship between their NOMS ratings and the VHI-10. These findings provide insight into the interpretation of patient-perceived and clinician-rated measures of vocal function and may allow for better management of expectations and patient counseling in the treatment of voice disorders.Objectives/Hypothesis: The relationship between patient-reported vocal handicap and clinician-rated measures of vocal dysfunction is not understood. This study aimed to determine if a correlation exists between the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and the Voice Functional Communication Measure rating in the National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS).",
keywords = "Dysphonia, Patient perception, Quality of life, Vocal function, Voice assessment, Voice handicap, Voice Handicap Index",
author = "Childs, {Lesley F.} and Clifford Bielinski and Laura Toles and Amy Hamilton and Janis Deane and Ted Mau",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.24889",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "180--185",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between patient-perceived vocal handicap and clinician-Rated level of vocal dysfunction

AU - Childs, Lesley F.

AU - Bielinski, Clifford

AU - Toles, Laura

AU - Hamilton, Amy

AU - Deane, Janis

AU - Mau, Ted

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Study Design: Retrospective case series.Methods: Four hundred and nine voice evaluations over 12 months at a tertiary voice center were reviewed. The VHI-10 and NOMS scores, diagnoses, and potential comorbid factors were collected and analyzed.Results: For the study population as a whole, there was a moderate negative correlation between the NOMS rating and the VHI-10 (Pearson r520.57). However, for a given NOMS level, there could be considerable spread in the VHI-10. In addition, as the NOMS decreased stepwise below level 4, there was a corresponding increase in the VHI-10. However, a similar trend in VHI-10 was not observed for NOMS above level 4, indicating the NOMS versus VHI-10 correlation was not linear. Among diagnostic groups, the strongest correlation was found for subjects with functional dysphonia. The NOMS versus VHI-10 correlation was not affected by gender or the coexistence of a psychiatric diagnosis.Conclusions: A simple relationship between VHI-10 and NOMS rating does not exist. Patients with mild vocal dysfunction have a less direct relationship between their NOMS ratings and the VHI-10. These findings provide insight into the interpretation of patient-perceived and clinician-rated measures of vocal function and may allow for better management of expectations and patient counseling in the treatment of voice disorders.Objectives/Hypothesis: The relationship between patient-reported vocal handicap and clinician-rated measures of vocal dysfunction is not understood. This study aimed to determine if a correlation exists between the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and the Voice Functional Communication Measure rating in the National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS).

AB - Study Design: Retrospective case series.Methods: Four hundred and nine voice evaluations over 12 months at a tertiary voice center were reviewed. The VHI-10 and NOMS scores, diagnoses, and potential comorbid factors were collected and analyzed.Results: For the study population as a whole, there was a moderate negative correlation between the NOMS rating and the VHI-10 (Pearson r520.57). However, for a given NOMS level, there could be considerable spread in the VHI-10. In addition, as the NOMS decreased stepwise below level 4, there was a corresponding increase in the VHI-10. However, a similar trend in VHI-10 was not observed for NOMS above level 4, indicating the NOMS versus VHI-10 correlation was not linear. Among diagnostic groups, the strongest correlation was found for subjects with functional dysphonia. The NOMS versus VHI-10 correlation was not affected by gender or the coexistence of a psychiatric diagnosis.Conclusions: A simple relationship between VHI-10 and NOMS rating does not exist. Patients with mild vocal dysfunction have a less direct relationship between their NOMS ratings and the VHI-10. These findings provide insight into the interpretation of patient-perceived and clinician-rated measures of vocal function and may allow for better management of expectations and patient counseling in the treatment of voice disorders.Objectives/Hypothesis: The relationship between patient-reported vocal handicap and clinician-rated measures of vocal dysfunction is not understood. This study aimed to determine if a correlation exists between the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and the Voice Functional Communication Measure rating in the National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS).

KW - Dysphonia

KW - Patient perception

KW - Quality of life

KW - Vocal function

KW - Voice assessment

KW - Voice handicap

KW - Voice Handicap Index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919844768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919844768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.24889

DO - 10.1002/lary.24889

M3 - Article

C2 - 25123059

AN - SCOPUS:84919844768

VL - 125

SP - 180

EP - 185

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 1

ER -