Renal stones, timing hypothesis, and eu-estrogenemia

Ralph J. Turner, Irwin J. Kerber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to apply the theory of the timing hypothesis to the data presented on the incidence of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative and the theory of eu-estrogenemia. METHODS: The study is a review of the literature on the theory of renal stone formation and postmenopausal women, including data from the Nurses' Health Study and the Women's Health Initiative. RESULTS: The analysis of the hazard ratios and CIs of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative shows that specific subgroups are affected. The CIs of the hazard ratios did not overlap 1.0 in the 60- to 64-year-old age group and in women whose time since menopause at study entry was 6 to 10 years. The CIs of all other age groups and years from menopause overlapped 1.0. Hormone therapy use by women described as "current users" at time of entry into the study in the treatment had a hazard ratio of 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The timing hypothesis of Clarkson (Menopause 14:373-384; 2007) seems to explain the hazard ratio and CI of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative. A closer analysis of the subgroups of women who had a higher incidence of renal stones suggests that the timing hypothesis may explain the results from the Women's Health Initiative versus previous studies such as the Nurses' Health Study. The CIs of the hazard ratios of the subgroups that did not overlap 1.0 included women 6 to 10 years beyond menopause, those who were aged from 60 to 64 years, and "never users" of hormone therapy. The hazard ratio for renal stones among "current users" in the Women's Health Initiative was 0.99. This analysis suggests that the timing hypothesis may affect estrogen receptor-α-mediated processes in the kidney. Furthermore, Clarkson's work may support the vascular etiology of renal stones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-108
Number of pages5
JournalMenopause
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Women's Health
Kidney
Menopause
Age Groups
Nurses
Hormones
Incidence
Health
Estrogen Receptors
Blood Vessels
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Estrogen
  • Eu-estrogenemia
  • Geripause
  • Kidney stones
  • Menopause
  • Nurses' Health study
  • Timing hypothesis
  • Women's health initiative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Renal stones, timing hypothesis, and eu-estrogenemia. / Turner, Ralph J.; Kerber, Irwin J.

In: Menopause, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 104-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Turner, Ralph J. ; Kerber, Irwin J. / Renal stones, timing hypothesis, and eu-estrogenemia. In: Menopause. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 104-108.
@article{2ee21bd8d47449378d2fd0f2791e0845,
title = "Renal stones, timing hypothesis, and eu-estrogenemia",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to apply the theory of the timing hypothesis to the data presented on the incidence of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative and the theory of eu-estrogenemia. METHODS: The study is a review of the literature on the theory of renal stone formation and postmenopausal women, including data from the Nurses' Health Study and the Women's Health Initiative. RESULTS: The analysis of the hazard ratios and CIs of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative shows that specific subgroups are affected. The CIs of the hazard ratios did not overlap 1.0 in the 60- to 64-year-old age group and in women whose time since menopause at study entry was 6 to 10 years. The CIs of all other age groups and years from menopause overlapped 1.0. Hormone therapy use by women described as {"}current users{"} at time of entry into the study in the treatment had a hazard ratio of 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The timing hypothesis of Clarkson (Menopause 14:373-384; 2007) seems to explain the hazard ratio and CI of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative. A closer analysis of the subgroups of women who had a higher incidence of renal stones suggests that the timing hypothesis may explain the results from the Women's Health Initiative versus previous studies such as the Nurses' Health Study. The CIs of the hazard ratios of the subgroups that did not overlap 1.0 included women 6 to 10 years beyond menopause, those who were aged from 60 to 64 years, and {"}never users{"} of hormone therapy. The hazard ratio for renal stones among {"}current users{"} in the Women's Health Initiative was 0.99. This analysis suggests that the timing hypothesis may affect estrogen receptor-α-mediated processes in the kidney. Furthermore, Clarkson's work may support the vascular etiology of renal stones.",
keywords = "Estrogen, Eu-estrogenemia, Geripause, Kidney stones, Menopause, Nurses' Health study, Timing hypothesis, Women's health initiative",
author = "Turner, {Ralph J.} and Kerber, {Irwin J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/gme.0b013e318221be9b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "104--108",
journal = "Menopause",
issn = "1072-3714",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renal stones, timing hypothesis, and eu-estrogenemia

AU - Turner, Ralph J.

AU - Kerber, Irwin J.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to apply the theory of the timing hypothesis to the data presented on the incidence of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative and the theory of eu-estrogenemia. METHODS: The study is a review of the literature on the theory of renal stone formation and postmenopausal women, including data from the Nurses' Health Study and the Women's Health Initiative. RESULTS: The analysis of the hazard ratios and CIs of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative shows that specific subgroups are affected. The CIs of the hazard ratios did not overlap 1.0 in the 60- to 64-year-old age group and in women whose time since menopause at study entry was 6 to 10 years. The CIs of all other age groups and years from menopause overlapped 1.0. Hormone therapy use by women described as "current users" at time of entry into the study in the treatment had a hazard ratio of 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The timing hypothesis of Clarkson (Menopause 14:373-384; 2007) seems to explain the hazard ratio and CI of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative. A closer analysis of the subgroups of women who had a higher incidence of renal stones suggests that the timing hypothesis may explain the results from the Women's Health Initiative versus previous studies such as the Nurses' Health Study. The CIs of the hazard ratios of the subgroups that did not overlap 1.0 included women 6 to 10 years beyond menopause, those who were aged from 60 to 64 years, and "never users" of hormone therapy. The hazard ratio for renal stones among "current users" in the Women's Health Initiative was 0.99. This analysis suggests that the timing hypothesis may affect estrogen receptor-α-mediated processes in the kidney. Furthermore, Clarkson's work may support the vascular etiology of renal stones.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to apply the theory of the timing hypothesis to the data presented on the incidence of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative and the theory of eu-estrogenemia. METHODS: The study is a review of the literature on the theory of renal stone formation and postmenopausal women, including data from the Nurses' Health Study and the Women's Health Initiative. RESULTS: The analysis of the hazard ratios and CIs of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative shows that specific subgroups are affected. The CIs of the hazard ratios did not overlap 1.0 in the 60- to 64-year-old age group and in women whose time since menopause at study entry was 6 to 10 years. The CIs of all other age groups and years from menopause overlapped 1.0. Hormone therapy use by women described as "current users" at time of entry into the study in the treatment had a hazard ratio of 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The timing hypothesis of Clarkson (Menopause 14:373-384; 2007) seems to explain the hazard ratio and CI of renal stones in the Women's Health Initiative. A closer analysis of the subgroups of women who had a higher incidence of renal stones suggests that the timing hypothesis may explain the results from the Women's Health Initiative versus previous studies such as the Nurses' Health Study. The CIs of the hazard ratios of the subgroups that did not overlap 1.0 included women 6 to 10 years beyond menopause, those who were aged from 60 to 64 years, and "never users" of hormone therapy. The hazard ratio for renal stones among "current users" in the Women's Health Initiative was 0.99. This analysis suggests that the timing hypothesis may affect estrogen receptor-α-mediated processes in the kidney. Furthermore, Clarkson's work may support the vascular etiology of renal stones.

KW - Estrogen

KW - Eu-estrogenemia

KW - Geripause

KW - Kidney stones

KW - Menopause

KW - Nurses' Health study

KW - Timing hypothesis

KW - Women's health initiative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84655169218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84655169218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/gme.0b013e318221be9b

DO - 10.1097/gme.0b013e318221be9b

M3 - Article

C2 - 21892110

AN - SCOPUS:84655169218

VL - 19

SP - 104

EP - 108

JO - Menopause

JF - Menopause

SN - 1072-3714

IS - 1

ER -