Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion

K. Gill, M. H. Krag, G. B. Johnson, L. D. Haugh, M. H. Pope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spinal motion usually is recorded from subjective observation of the fully flexed trunk using a goniometer or the distance from the fingertips to the floor. To quantify functional improvement in the low-back pain patient, the repeatability of four clinical techniques was studied: the common fingertip-to-floor distance; the modified Schober; the two-inclinometer method, and a photometric technique. Ten normal subjects (five men, five women), ages 24 to 34 years old, were examined in full flexion, full extension, and the erect position, both standing and sitting. Repeatability was poor for the fingertip-to-floor method in all postures and for the two-inclinometer method in full flexion. Although other methods for various postures had good repeatability, the modified Schober method of determining lumbar spinal motion was the most repeatable and is recommended for a routine, noninvasive, clinical evaluation of lumbar spinal motion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-53
Number of pages4
JournalSpine
Volume13
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1988

Fingerprint

Posture
Low Back Pain
Observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Gill, K., Krag, M. H., Johnson, G. B., Haugh, L. D., & Pope, M. H. (1988). Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion. Spine, 13(1), 50-53.

Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion. / Gill, K.; Krag, M. H.; Johnson, G. B.; Haugh, L. D.; Pope, M. H.

In: Spine, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1988, p. 50-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gill, K, Krag, MH, Johnson, GB, Haugh, LD & Pope, MH 1988, 'Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion', Spine, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 50-53.
Gill K, Krag MH, Johnson GB, Haugh LD, Pope MH. Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion. Spine. 1988;13(1):50-53.
Gill, K. ; Krag, M. H. ; Johnson, G. B. ; Haugh, L. D. ; Pope, M. H. / Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion. In: Spine. 1988 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 50-53.
@article{97acbe274dd04c02996bf2a88635a802,
title = "Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion",
abstract = "Spinal motion usually is recorded from subjective observation of the fully flexed trunk using a goniometer or the distance from the fingertips to the floor. To quantify functional improvement in the low-back pain patient, the repeatability of four clinical techniques was studied: the common fingertip-to-floor distance; the modified Schober; the two-inclinometer method, and a photometric technique. Ten normal subjects (five men, five women), ages 24 to 34 years old, were examined in full flexion, full extension, and the erect position, both standing and sitting. Repeatability was poor for the fingertip-to-floor method in all postures and for the two-inclinometer method in full flexion. Although other methods for various postures had good repeatability, the modified Schober method of determining lumbar spinal motion was the most repeatable and is recommended for a routine, noninvasive, clinical evaluation of lumbar spinal motion.",
author = "K. Gill and Krag, {M. H.} and Johnson, {G. B.} and Haugh, {L. D.} and Pope, {M. H.}",
year = "1988",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "50--53",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeatability of four clinical methods for assessment of lumbar spinal motion

AU - Gill, K.

AU - Krag, M. H.

AU - Johnson, G. B.

AU - Haugh, L. D.

AU - Pope, M. H.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Spinal motion usually is recorded from subjective observation of the fully flexed trunk using a goniometer or the distance from the fingertips to the floor. To quantify functional improvement in the low-back pain patient, the repeatability of four clinical techniques was studied: the common fingertip-to-floor distance; the modified Schober; the two-inclinometer method, and a photometric technique. Ten normal subjects (five men, five women), ages 24 to 34 years old, were examined in full flexion, full extension, and the erect position, both standing and sitting. Repeatability was poor for the fingertip-to-floor method in all postures and for the two-inclinometer method in full flexion. Although other methods for various postures had good repeatability, the modified Schober method of determining lumbar spinal motion was the most repeatable and is recommended for a routine, noninvasive, clinical evaluation of lumbar spinal motion.

AB - Spinal motion usually is recorded from subjective observation of the fully flexed trunk using a goniometer or the distance from the fingertips to the floor. To quantify functional improvement in the low-back pain patient, the repeatability of four clinical techniques was studied: the common fingertip-to-floor distance; the modified Schober; the two-inclinometer method, and a photometric technique. Ten normal subjects (five men, five women), ages 24 to 34 years old, were examined in full flexion, full extension, and the erect position, both standing and sitting. Repeatability was poor for the fingertip-to-floor method in all postures and for the two-inclinometer method in full flexion. Although other methods for various postures had good repeatability, the modified Schober method of determining lumbar spinal motion was the most repeatable and is recommended for a routine, noninvasive, clinical evaluation of lumbar spinal motion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023910539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023910539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 50

EP - 53

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 1

ER -