Resident versus faculty member simulation debriefing

Traci Adams, Chad Newton, Hetal Patel, Melanie Sulistio, Andrew Tomlinson, Won Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Near-peer teaching is effective in graduate medical education, but it has not been compared with faculty member teaching in resident simulation. In this study, we sought to compare debriefing sessions of internal medicine (IM) intern simulation sessions led by academic faculty doctors with those led by senior IM residents in order to measure the effectiveness of near-peer teaching in this setting. Near-peer teaching is effective in graduate medical education, but has not been compared with faculty member teaching in resident simulation Method: Internal medicine interns participated in four simulation cases, two of which were debriefed by faculty members and two of which were debriefed by residents. Pre-simulation knowledge assessment was completed prior to the case. Following each debriefing, interns completed a Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) survey. Post-simulation knowledge assessments were completed 6 months after simulation. Debriefings were recorded and transcribed. Each statement made during debriefing was classified as either correct or erroneous by blinded reviewers. Results: Fifty interns participated in simulation, and the response rate on the DASH survey was 88%. There was no difference between DASH scores (p = 0.13), post-simulation knowledge assessments or error rates during debriefing (p = 0.31) for faculty member and resident instructors. Conclusion: Our study suggests that residents and faculty members provide a similar quality of simulation instruction based on qualitative and quantitative evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalClinical Teacher
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Teaching
Internal Medicine
Health Care Surveys
Graduate Medical Education
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Review and Exam Preparation

Cite this

Resident versus faculty member simulation debriefing. / Adams, Traci; Newton, Chad; Patel, Hetal; Sulistio, Melanie; Tomlinson, Andrew; Lee, Won.

In: Clinical Teacher, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab07a8f4920f43e8a50ed33bb1f2c98d,
title = "Resident versus faculty member simulation debriefing",
abstract = "Background: Near-peer teaching is effective in graduate medical education, but it has not been compared with faculty member teaching in resident simulation. In this study, we sought to compare debriefing sessions of internal medicine (IM) intern simulation sessions led by academic faculty doctors with those led by senior IM residents in order to measure the effectiveness of near-peer teaching in this setting. Near-peer teaching is effective in graduate medical education, but has not been compared with faculty member teaching in resident simulation Method: Internal medicine interns participated in four simulation cases, two of which were debriefed by faculty members and two of which were debriefed by residents. Pre-simulation knowledge assessment was completed prior to the case. Following each debriefing, interns completed a Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) survey. Post-simulation knowledge assessments were completed 6 months after simulation. Debriefings were recorded and transcribed. Each statement made during debriefing was classified as either correct or erroneous by blinded reviewers. Results: Fifty interns participated in simulation, and the response rate on the DASH survey was 88{\%}. There was no difference between DASH scores (p = 0.13), post-simulation knowledge assessments or error rates during debriefing (p = 0.31) for faculty member and resident instructors. Conclusion: Our study suggests that residents and faculty members provide a similar quality of simulation instruction based on qualitative and quantitative evaluation.",
author = "Traci Adams and Chad Newton and Hetal Patel and Melanie Sulistio and Andrew Tomlinson and Won Lee",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/tct.12735",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Clinical Teacher",
issn = "1743-4971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resident versus faculty member simulation debriefing

AU - Adams, Traci

AU - Newton, Chad

AU - Patel, Hetal

AU - Sulistio, Melanie

AU - Tomlinson, Andrew

AU - Lee, Won

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Near-peer teaching is effective in graduate medical education, but it has not been compared with faculty member teaching in resident simulation. In this study, we sought to compare debriefing sessions of internal medicine (IM) intern simulation sessions led by academic faculty doctors with those led by senior IM residents in order to measure the effectiveness of near-peer teaching in this setting. Near-peer teaching is effective in graduate medical education, but has not been compared with faculty member teaching in resident simulation Method: Internal medicine interns participated in four simulation cases, two of which were debriefed by faculty members and two of which were debriefed by residents. Pre-simulation knowledge assessment was completed prior to the case. Following each debriefing, interns completed a Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) survey. Post-simulation knowledge assessments were completed 6 months after simulation. Debriefings were recorded and transcribed. Each statement made during debriefing was classified as either correct or erroneous by blinded reviewers. Results: Fifty interns participated in simulation, and the response rate on the DASH survey was 88%. There was no difference between DASH scores (p = 0.13), post-simulation knowledge assessments or error rates during debriefing (p = 0.31) for faculty member and resident instructors. Conclusion: Our study suggests that residents and faculty members provide a similar quality of simulation instruction based on qualitative and quantitative evaluation.

AB - Background: Near-peer teaching is effective in graduate medical education, but it has not been compared with faculty member teaching in resident simulation. In this study, we sought to compare debriefing sessions of internal medicine (IM) intern simulation sessions led by academic faculty doctors with those led by senior IM residents in order to measure the effectiveness of near-peer teaching in this setting. Near-peer teaching is effective in graduate medical education, but has not been compared with faculty member teaching in resident simulation Method: Internal medicine interns participated in four simulation cases, two of which were debriefed by faculty members and two of which were debriefed by residents. Pre-simulation knowledge assessment was completed prior to the case. Following each debriefing, interns completed a Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) survey. Post-simulation knowledge assessments were completed 6 months after simulation. Debriefings were recorded and transcribed. Each statement made during debriefing was classified as either correct or erroneous by blinded reviewers. Results: Fifty interns participated in simulation, and the response rate on the DASH survey was 88%. There was no difference between DASH scores (p = 0.13), post-simulation knowledge assessments or error rates during debriefing (p = 0.31) for faculty member and resident instructors. Conclusion: Our study suggests that residents and faculty members provide a similar quality of simulation instruction based on qualitative and quantitative evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034090692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034090692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/tct.12735

DO - 10.1111/tct.12735

M3 - Article

C2 - 29144023

AN - SCOPUS:85034090692

JO - Clinical Teacher

JF - Clinical Teacher

SN - 1743-4971

ER -