Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Cost Comparison of Immediate Second Look Flexible Nephroscopy Versus Expectant Management

Jay D. Raman, Aditya Bagrodia, Karim Bensalah, Margaret S Pearle, Yair Lotan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We performed a cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy vs expectant management for post-percutaneous nephrostolithotomy residual fragments. Materials and Methods: We used a decision analysis model to compare the cost of managing residual fragments by second look flexible nephroscopy vs observation. Outcomes of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy were determined from institutional experience and published shock wave lithotripsy series. Cost data were obtained from billing records. One-way sensitivity analysis was done to evaluate incurred costs of second look flexible nephroscopy while varying the likelihood of a stone event, the probability of surgery and the cost of surgical intervention. Two-way sensitivity analysis was done to assess the model across a range of scenarios. Results: Based on data in the literature and our institutional experience 40% of patients with residual fragments 4 mm or less had a stone event, of whom 57% required surgical intervention. Based on these estimates the average cost of expectant management for a residual fragment 4 mm or less vs greater than 4 was $1,743 vs $4,674. The average incremental cost of second look flexible nephroscopy at our institution was $2,475. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that varying assumptions dramatically altered conclusions about the cost benefit of second look flexible nephroscopy. Conclusions: Our model suggests that second look flexible nephroscopy is not cost advantageous in all patients with post-percutaneous nephrostolithotomy residual fragments. Cost benefit analysis is significantly impacted by the likelihood of a stone related event, the need for surgical intervention and surgical costs. Compared to an observational strategy second look flexible nephroscopy incurs lower costs for greater than 4 mm but not for 4 mm or less residual fragments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-193
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume183
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Support Techniques
Lithotripsy
Observation

Keywords

  • cost-benefit analysis
  • decision support techniques
  • kidney
  • kidney calculi
  • nephrostomy
  • percutaneous

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

@article{2d408eee2ea8419ab792ce4cd33fe128,
title = "Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Cost Comparison of Immediate Second Look Flexible Nephroscopy Versus Expectant Management",
abstract = "Purpose: We performed a cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy vs expectant management for post-percutaneous nephrostolithotomy residual fragments. Materials and Methods: We used a decision analysis model to compare the cost of managing residual fragments by second look flexible nephroscopy vs observation. Outcomes of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy were determined from institutional experience and published shock wave lithotripsy series. Cost data were obtained from billing records. One-way sensitivity analysis was done to evaluate incurred costs of second look flexible nephroscopy while varying the likelihood of a stone event, the probability of surgery and the cost of surgical intervention. Two-way sensitivity analysis was done to assess the model across a range of scenarios. Results: Based on data in the literature and our institutional experience 40{\%} of patients with residual fragments 4 mm or less had a stone event, of whom 57{\%} required surgical intervention. Based on these estimates the average cost of expectant management for a residual fragment 4 mm or less vs greater than 4 was $1,743 vs $4,674. The average incremental cost of second look flexible nephroscopy at our institution was $2,475. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that varying assumptions dramatically altered conclusions about the cost benefit of second look flexible nephroscopy. Conclusions: Our model suggests that second look flexible nephroscopy is not cost advantageous in all patients with post-percutaneous nephrostolithotomy residual fragments. Cost benefit analysis is significantly impacted by the likelihood of a stone related event, the need for surgical intervention and surgical costs. Compared to an observational strategy second look flexible nephroscopy incurs lower costs for greater than 4 mm but not for 4 mm or less residual fragments.",
keywords = "cost-benefit analysis, decision support techniques, kidney, kidney calculi, nephrostomy, percutaneous",
author = "Raman, {Jay D.} and Aditya Bagrodia and Karim Bensalah and Pearle, {Margaret S} and Yair Lotan",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.135",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "183",
pages = "188--193",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

T2 - Cost Comparison of Immediate Second Look Flexible Nephroscopy Versus Expectant Management

AU - Raman, Jay D.

AU - Bagrodia, Aditya

AU - Bensalah, Karim

AU - Pearle, Margaret S

AU - Lotan, Yair

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Purpose: We performed a cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy vs expectant management for post-percutaneous nephrostolithotomy residual fragments. Materials and Methods: We used a decision analysis model to compare the cost of managing residual fragments by second look flexible nephroscopy vs observation. Outcomes of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy were determined from institutional experience and published shock wave lithotripsy series. Cost data were obtained from billing records. One-way sensitivity analysis was done to evaluate incurred costs of second look flexible nephroscopy while varying the likelihood of a stone event, the probability of surgery and the cost of surgical intervention. Two-way sensitivity analysis was done to assess the model across a range of scenarios. Results: Based on data in the literature and our institutional experience 40% of patients with residual fragments 4 mm or less had a stone event, of whom 57% required surgical intervention. Based on these estimates the average cost of expectant management for a residual fragment 4 mm or less vs greater than 4 was $1,743 vs $4,674. The average incremental cost of second look flexible nephroscopy at our institution was $2,475. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that varying assumptions dramatically altered conclusions about the cost benefit of second look flexible nephroscopy. Conclusions: Our model suggests that second look flexible nephroscopy is not cost advantageous in all patients with post-percutaneous nephrostolithotomy residual fragments. Cost benefit analysis is significantly impacted by the likelihood of a stone related event, the need for surgical intervention and surgical costs. Compared to an observational strategy second look flexible nephroscopy incurs lower costs for greater than 4 mm but not for 4 mm or less residual fragments.

AB - Purpose: We performed a cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy vs expectant management for post-percutaneous nephrostolithotomy residual fragments. Materials and Methods: We used a decision analysis model to compare the cost of managing residual fragments by second look flexible nephroscopy vs observation. Outcomes of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy were determined from institutional experience and published shock wave lithotripsy series. Cost data were obtained from billing records. One-way sensitivity analysis was done to evaluate incurred costs of second look flexible nephroscopy while varying the likelihood of a stone event, the probability of surgery and the cost of surgical intervention. Two-way sensitivity analysis was done to assess the model across a range of scenarios. Results: Based on data in the literature and our institutional experience 40% of patients with residual fragments 4 mm or less had a stone event, of whom 57% required surgical intervention. Based on these estimates the average cost of expectant management for a residual fragment 4 mm or less vs greater than 4 was $1,743 vs $4,674. The average incremental cost of second look flexible nephroscopy at our institution was $2,475. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that varying assumptions dramatically altered conclusions about the cost benefit of second look flexible nephroscopy. Conclusions: Our model suggests that second look flexible nephroscopy is not cost advantageous in all patients with post-percutaneous nephrostolithotomy residual fragments. Cost benefit analysis is significantly impacted by the likelihood of a stone related event, the need for surgical intervention and surgical costs. Compared to an observational strategy second look flexible nephroscopy incurs lower costs for greater than 4 mm but not for 4 mm or less residual fragments.

KW - cost-benefit analysis

KW - decision support techniques

KW - kidney

KW - kidney calculi

KW - nephrostomy

KW - percutaneous

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71249097293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71249097293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.135

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.135

M3 - Article

VL - 183

SP - 188

EP - 193

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -