Responsibility and generativity in online learning communities

Alicia D. Beth, Michelle E. Jordan, Diane L. Schallert, JoyLynn H. Reed, Minseong Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether and how students enact responsibility and generativity through their comments in asynchronous online discussions. Responsibility referred to discourse markers indicating participants' sense that their contributions are required in order to uphold their discursive obligations, and generativity referred to the capacity of comments to attract responses by virtue of content or stylistic features that convey voice or social presence. Participants were 24 graduate students and their instructor in a hybrid class, with face-to-face class meetings supplemented by three asynchronous online discussions around course readings. Discourse analytic techniques and naturalistic inquiry were used to analyze discussion transcripts. Results suggest that students differed in the degree to which they showed responsibility to the online discussions. They also differed in their generativity, as defined by the attractiveness, social responsiveness, and intellectual responsiveness their comments displayed. Interestingly, responsibility and generativity were not necessarily co-incident, with some students who had contributed many comments to the discussion having comments that were highly generative and others much less generative. Likewise, some students who were minimally responsible to their discursive obligations contributed comments that were nevertheless generative. We argue that responsibility and generativity contribute to a sense that computer-mediated discussion participants are members of a learning community, a sense that may be prerequisite for successful academic outcomes but may be difficult to create in online contexts where relationships may require more time and effort. Conclusions suggest how instructors and learners can help make online learning more productive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-484
Number of pages14
JournalInteractive Learning Environments
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2015

Fingerprint

Students
responsibility
learning
community
student
obligation
instructor
discourse
social attraction
incident
graduate

Keywords

  • community
  • computer-mediated discussion
  • hybrid learning environments
  • online learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Beth, A. D., Jordan, M. E., Schallert, D. L., Reed, J. H., & Kim, M. (2015). Responsibility and generativity in online learning communities. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.788035

Responsibility and generativity in online learning communities. / Beth, Alicia D.; Jordan, Michelle E.; Schallert, Diane L.; Reed, JoyLynn H.; Kim, Minseong.

In: Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 23, No. 4, 04.07.2015, p. 471-484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beth, AD, Jordan, ME, Schallert, DL, Reed, JH & Kim, M 2015, 'Responsibility and generativity in online learning communities', Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.788035
Beth, Alicia D. ; Jordan, Michelle E. ; Schallert, Diane L. ; Reed, JoyLynn H. ; Kim, Minseong. / Responsibility and generativity in online learning communities. In: Interactive Learning Environments. 2015 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 471-484.
@article{242c478bfdbb44afb7c54b0e845a141c,
title = "Responsibility and generativity in online learning communities",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to investigate whether and how students enact responsibility and generativity through their comments in asynchronous online discussions. Responsibility referred to discourse markers indicating participants' sense that their contributions are required in order to uphold their discursive obligations, and generativity referred to the capacity of comments to attract responses by virtue of content or stylistic features that convey voice or social presence. Participants were 24 graduate students and their instructor in a hybrid class, with face-to-face class meetings supplemented by three asynchronous online discussions around course readings. Discourse analytic techniques and naturalistic inquiry were used to analyze discussion transcripts. Results suggest that students differed in the degree to which they showed responsibility to the online discussions. They also differed in their generativity, as defined by the attractiveness, social responsiveness, and intellectual responsiveness their comments displayed. Interestingly, responsibility and generativity were not necessarily co-incident, with some students who had contributed many comments to the discussion having comments that were highly generative and others much less generative. Likewise, some students who were minimally responsible to their discursive obligations contributed comments that were nevertheless generative. We argue that responsibility and generativity contribute to a sense that computer-mediated discussion participants are members of a learning community, a sense that may be prerequisite for successful academic outcomes but may be difficult to create in online contexts where relationships may require more time and effort. Conclusions suggest how instructors and learners can help make online learning more productive.",
keywords = "community, computer-mediated discussion, hybrid learning environments, online learning",
author = "Beth, {Alicia D.} and Jordan, {Michelle E.} and Schallert, {Diane L.} and Reed, {JoyLynn H.} and Minseong Kim",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10494820.2013.788035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "471--484",
journal = "Interactive Learning Environments",
issn = "1049-4820",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsibility and generativity in online learning communities

AU - Beth, Alicia D.

AU - Jordan, Michelle E.

AU - Schallert, Diane L.

AU - Reed, JoyLynn H.

AU - Kim, Minseong

PY - 2015/7/4

Y1 - 2015/7/4

N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate whether and how students enact responsibility and generativity through their comments in asynchronous online discussions. Responsibility referred to discourse markers indicating participants' sense that their contributions are required in order to uphold their discursive obligations, and generativity referred to the capacity of comments to attract responses by virtue of content or stylistic features that convey voice or social presence. Participants were 24 graduate students and their instructor in a hybrid class, with face-to-face class meetings supplemented by three asynchronous online discussions around course readings. Discourse analytic techniques and naturalistic inquiry were used to analyze discussion transcripts. Results suggest that students differed in the degree to which they showed responsibility to the online discussions. They also differed in their generativity, as defined by the attractiveness, social responsiveness, and intellectual responsiveness their comments displayed. Interestingly, responsibility and generativity were not necessarily co-incident, with some students who had contributed many comments to the discussion having comments that were highly generative and others much less generative. Likewise, some students who were minimally responsible to their discursive obligations contributed comments that were nevertheless generative. We argue that responsibility and generativity contribute to a sense that computer-mediated discussion participants are members of a learning community, a sense that may be prerequisite for successful academic outcomes but may be difficult to create in online contexts where relationships may require more time and effort. Conclusions suggest how instructors and learners can help make online learning more productive.

AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate whether and how students enact responsibility and generativity through their comments in asynchronous online discussions. Responsibility referred to discourse markers indicating participants' sense that their contributions are required in order to uphold their discursive obligations, and generativity referred to the capacity of comments to attract responses by virtue of content or stylistic features that convey voice or social presence. Participants were 24 graduate students and their instructor in a hybrid class, with face-to-face class meetings supplemented by three asynchronous online discussions around course readings. Discourse analytic techniques and naturalistic inquiry were used to analyze discussion transcripts. Results suggest that students differed in the degree to which they showed responsibility to the online discussions. They also differed in their generativity, as defined by the attractiveness, social responsiveness, and intellectual responsiveness their comments displayed. Interestingly, responsibility and generativity were not necessarily co-incident, with some students who had contributed many comments to the discussion having comments that were highly generative and others much less generative. Likewise, some students who were minimally responsible to their discursive obligations contributed comments that were nevertheless generative. We argue that responsibility and generativity contribute to a sense that computer-mediated discussion participants are members of a learning community, a sense that may be prerequisite for successful academic outcomes but may be difficult to create in online contexts where relationships may require more time and effort. Conclusions suggest how instructors and learners can help make online learning more productive.

KW - community

KW - computer-mediated discussion

KW - hybrid learning environments

KW - online learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931569346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931569346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10494820.2013.788035

DO - 10.1080/10494820.2013.788035

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84931569346

VL - 23

SP - 471

EP - 484

JO - Interactive Learning Environments

JF - Interactive Learning Environments

SN - 1049-4820

IS - 4

ER -