Results of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs (ADROP) Survey of Radiation Oncology Residency Program Directors

Eleanor E R Harris, May Abdel-Wahab, Ann E. Spangler, Colleen A. Lawton, Robert J. Amdur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To survey the radiation oncology residency program directors on the topics of departmental and institutional support systems, residency program structure, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements, and challenges as program director. Methods: A survey was developed and distributed by the leadership of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs to all radiation oncology program directors. Summary statistics, medians, and ranges were collated from responses. Results: Radiation oncology program directors had implemented all current required aspects of the ACGME Outcome Project into their training curriculum. Didactic curricula were similar across programs nationally, but research requirements and resources varied widely. Program directors responded that implementation of the ACGME Outcome Project and the external review process were among their greatest challenges. Protected time was the top priority for program directors. Conclusions: The Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs recommends that all radiation oncology program directors have protected time and an administrative stipend to support their important administrative and educational role. Departments and institutions should provide adequate and equitable resources to the program directors and residents to meet increasingly demanding training program requirements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-337
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume74
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
Internship and Residency
Graduate Medical Education
Accreditation
radiation
Curriculum
education
Surveys and Questionnaires
requirements
resources
Education
leadership
support systems
Research

Keywords

  • ACGME Outcome Project
  • Graduate medical education
  • Radiation oncology
  • Residency program directors survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Results of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs (ADROP) Survey of Radiation Oncology Residency Program Directors. / Harris, Eleanor E R; Abdel-Wahab, May; Spangler, Ann E.; Lawton, Colleen A.; Amdur, Robert J.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 74, No. 2, 01.06.2009, p. 327-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harris, Eleanor E R ; Abdel-Wahab, May ; Spangler, Ann E. ; Lawton, Colleen A. ; Amdur, Robert J. / Results of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs (ADROP) Survey of Radiation Oncology Residency Program Directors. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2009 ; Vol. 74, No. 2. pp. 327-337.
@article{02bf889e7bb1495eb509c0dd970d48ce,
title = "Results of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs (ADROP) Survey of Radiation Oncology Residency Program Directors",
abstract = "Purpose: To survey the radiation oncology residency program directors on the topics of departmental and institutional support systems, residency program structure, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements, and challenges as program director. Methods: A survey was developed and distributed by the leadership of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs to all radiation oncology program directors. Summary statistics, medians, and ranges were collated from responses. Results: Radiation oncology program directors had implemented all current required aspects of the ACGME Outcome Project into their training curriculum. Didactic curricula were similar across programs nationally, but research requirements and resources varied widely. Program directors responded that implementation of the ACGME Outcome Project and the external review process were among their greatest challenges. Protected time was the top priority for program directors. Conclusions: The Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs recommends that all radiation oncology program directors have protected time and an administrative stipend to support their important administrative and educational role. Departments and institutions should provide adequate and equitable resources to the program directors and residents to meet increasingly demanding training program requirements.",
keywords = "ACGME Outcome Project, Graduate medical education, Radiation oncology, Residency program directors survey",
author = "Harris, {Eleanor E R} and May Abdel-Wahab and Spangler, {Ann E.} and Lawton, {Colleen A.} and Amdur, {Robert J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "327--337",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs (ADROP) Survey of Radiation Oncology Residency Program Directors

AU - Harris, Eleanor E R

AU - Abdel-Wahab, May

AU - Spangler, Ann E.

AU - Lawton, Colleen A.

AU - Amdur, Robert J.

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - Purpose: To survey the radiation oncology residency program directors on the topics of departmental and institutional support systems, residency program structure, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements, and challenges as program director. Methods: A survey was developed and distributed by the leadership of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs to all radiation oncology program directors. Summary statistics, medians, and ranges were collated from responses. Results: Radiation oncology program directors had implemented all current required aspects of the ACGME Outcome Project into their training curriculum. Didactic curricula were similar across programs nationally, but research requirements and resources varied widely. Program directors responded that implementation of the ACGME Outcome Project and the external review process were among their greatest challenges. Protected time was the top priority for program directors. Conclusions: The Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs recommends that all radiation oncology program directors have protected time and an administrative stipend to support their important administrative and educational role. Departments and institutions should provide adequate and equitable resources to the program directors and residents to meet increasingly demanding training program requirements.

AB - Purpose: To survey the radiation oncology residency program directors on the topics of departmental and institutional support systems, residency program structure, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements, and challenges as program director. Methods: A survey was developed and distributed by the leadership of the Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs to all radiation oncology program directors. Summary statistics, medians, and ranges were collated from responses. Results: Radiation oncology program directors had implemented all current required aspects of the ACGME Outcome Project into their training curriculum. Didactic curricula were similar across programs nationally, but research requirements and resources varied widely. Program directors responded that implementation of the ACGME Outcome Project and the external review process were among their greatest challenges. Protected time was the top priority for program directors. Conclusions: The Association of Directors of Radiation Oncology Programs recommends that all radiation oncology program directors have protected time and an administrative stipend to support their important administrative and educational role. Departments and institutions should provide adequate and equitable resources to the program directors and residents to meet increasingly demanding training program requirements.

KW - ACGME Outcome Project

KW - Graduate medical education

KW - Radiation oncology

KW - Residency program directors survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65449164335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65449164335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.079

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.079

M3 - Article

C2 - 19427549

AN - SCOPUS:65449164335

VL - 74

SP - 327

EP - 337

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 2

ER -