Retrospective review of the costs of routine pelvic X-rays in a trauma setting

James Feeney, Vijay Jayaraman, Stephen Luk, David Shapiro, Mandeep Virk, Michael Twohig, Lenworth Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) technology plays an important role in the evaluation of injured patients. At our institution pelvic X-ray (PXR) is obtained routinely on trauma patients. Many also receive MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis for other indications. We hypothesized that there would be a substantial cost savings in adopting a policy of deferring PXR in a hemodynamically normal patient who will also proceed to MDCT for other indications. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of trauma patients from February 1, 2008 to February 1, 2009. We reviewed whether a PXR was done, the result, whether an MDCT was also done, and the presence or absence of pelvic fractures. We collected billing and cost data from various hospital sources. We identified 1,330 patients with PXR between February 1, 2008 and February 1, 2009. Of those patients, 810 (61%) had MDCT after PXR. Sixty-six patients (8.0%) had pelvic fractures; 39 were correctly identified on PXR (59% of fractures). Twenty-seven were detected only by MDCT (41% of fractures); all pelvic fractures were identified on MDCT. Seven hundred and forty-four patients (92% of patients with both PXR and MDCT) had negative PXR and negative MDCT. Using three methods of cost analysis, the estimated cost savings range is from $77,011 to $331,080. MDCT of the pelvis is more sensitive and more specific than PXR. In patients who are hemodynamically normal and asymptomatic, forgoing routine PXR could result in an estimated savings from $77,011 to $331,080, depending on the method used to calculate costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-341
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume77
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Multidetector Computed Tomography
X-Rays
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Cost Savings
Pelvis
X Ray Computed Tomography
Abdomen
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Feeney, J., Jayaraman, V., Luk, S., Shapiro, D., Virk, M., Twohig, M., & Jacobs, L. (2011). Retrospective review of the costs of routine pelvic X-rays in a trauma setting. American Surgeon, 77(3), 337-341.

Retrospective review of the costs of routine pelvic X-rays in a trauma setting. / Feeney, James; Jayaraman, Vijay; Luk, Stephen; Shapiro, David; Virk, Mandeep; Twohig, Michael; Jacobs, Lenworth.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 77, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 337-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feeney, J, Jayaraman, V, Luk, S, Shapiro, D, Virk, M, Twohig, M & Jacobs, L 2011, 'Retrospective review of the costs of routine pelvic X-rays in a trauma setting', American Surgeon, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 337-341.
Feeney J, Jayaraman V, Luk S, Shapiro D, Virk M, Twohig M et al. Retrospective review of the costs of routine pelvic X-rays in a trauma setting. American Surgeon. 2011 Mar;77(3):337-341.
Feeney, James ; Jayaraman, Vijay ; Luk, Stephen ; Shapiro, David ; Virk, Mandeep ; Twohig, Michael ; Jacobs, Lenworth. / Retrospective review of the costs of routine pelvic X-rays in a trauma setting. In: American Surgeon. 2011 ; Vol. 77, No. 3. pp. 337-341.
@article{b8e1594ebc654972b15cd9ab72bbe07c,
title = "Retrospective review of the costs of routine pelvic X-rays in a trauma setting",
abstract = "Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) technology plays an important role in the evaluation of injured patients. At our institution pelvic X-ray (PXR) is obtained routinely on trauma patients. Many also receive MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis for other indications. We hypothesized that there would be a substantial cost savings in adopting a policy of deferring PXR in a hemodynamically normal patient who will also proceed to MDCT for other indications. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of trauma patients from February 1, 2008 to February 1, 2009. We reviewed whether a PXR was done, the result, whether an MDCT was also done, and the presence or absence of pelvic fractures. We collected billing and cost data from various hospital sources. We identified 1,330 patients with PXR between February 1, 2008 and February 1, 2009. Of those patients, 810 (61{\%}) had MDCT after PXR. Sixty-six patients (8.0{\%}) had pelvic fractures; 39 were correctly identified on PXR (59{\%} of fractures). Twenty-seven were detected only by MDCT (41{\%} of fractures); all pelvic fractures were identified on MDCT. Seven hundred and forty-four patients (92{\%} of patients with both PXR and MDCT) had negative PXR and negative MDCT. Using three methods of cost analysis, the estimated cost savings range is from $77,011 to $331,080. MDCT of the pelvis is more sensitive and more specific than PXR. In patients who are hemodynamically normal and asymptomatic, forgoing routine PXR could result in an estimated savings from $77,011 to $331,080, depending on the method used to calculate costs.",
author = "James Feeney and Vijay Jayaraman and Stephen Luk and David Shapiro and Mandeep Virk and Michael Twohig and Lenworth Jacobs",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "337--341",
journal = "American Surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrospective review of the costs of routine pelvic X-rays in a trauma setting

AU - Feeney, James

AU - Jayaraman, Vijay

AU - Luk, Stephen

AU - Shapiro, David

AU - Virk, Mandeep

AU - Twohig, Michael

AU - Jacobs, Lenworth

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) technology plays an important role in the evaluation of injured patients. At our institution pelvic X-ray (PXR) is obtained routinely on trauma patients. Many also receive MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis for other indications. We hypothesized that there would be a substantial cost savings in adopting a policy of deferring PXR in a hemodynamically normal patient who will also proceed to MDCT for other indications. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of trauma patients from February 1, 2008 to February 1, 2009. We reviewed whether a PXR was done, the result, whether an MDCT was also done, and the presence or absence of pelvic fractures. We collected billing and cost data from various hospital sources. We identified 1,330 patients with PXR between February 1, 2008 and February 1, 2009. Of those patients, 810 (61%) had MDCT after PXR. Sixty-six patients (8.0%) had pelvic fractures; 39 were correctly identified on PXR (59% of fractures). Twenty-seven were detected only by MDCT (41% of fractures); all pelvic fractures were identified on MDCT. Seven hundred and forty-four patients (92% of patients with both PXR and MDCT) had negative PXR and negative MDCT. Using three methods of cost analysis, the estimated cost savings range is from $77,011 to $331,080. MDCT of the pelvis is more sensitive and more specific than PXR. In patients who are hemodynamically normal and asymptomatic, forgoing routine PXR could result in an estimated savings from $77,011 to $331,080, depending on the method used to calculate costs.

AB - Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) technology plays an important role in the evaluation of injured patients. At our institution pelvic X-ray (PXR) is obtained routinely on trauma patients. Many also receive MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis for other indications. We hypothesized that there would be a substantial cost savings in adopting a policy of deferring PXR in a hemodynamically normal patient who will also proceed to MDCT for other indications. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of trauma patients from February 1, 2008 to February 1, 2009. We reviewed whether a PXR was done, the result, whether an MDCT was also done, and the presence or absence of pelvic fractures. We collected billing and cost data from various hospital sources. We identified 1,330 patients with PXR between February 1, 2008 and February 1, 2009. Of those patients, 810 (61%) had MDCT after PXR. Sixty-six patients (8.0%) had pelvic fractures; 39 were correctly identified on PXR (59% of fractures). Twenty-seven were detected only by MDCT (41% of fractures); all pelvic fractures were identified on MDCT. Seven hundred and forty-four patients (92% of patients with both PXR and MDCT) had negative PXR and negative MDCT. Using three methods of cost analysis, the estimated cost savings range is from $77,011 to $331,080. MDCT of the pelvis is more sensitive and more specific than PXR. In patients who are hemodynamically normal and asymptomatic, forgoing routine PXR could result in an estimated savings from $77,011 to $331,080, depending on the method used to calculate costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952427076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952427076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21375847

AN - SCOPUS:79952427076

VL - 77

SP - 337

EP - 341

JO - American Surgeon

JF - American Surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 3

ER -