Risk beliefs and interest in counseling: Focus-group interviews among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients

Elizabeth L. Ryan, Celette Sugg Skinner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of breast cancer patients are at potential genetic risk for developing breast cancer. Although FDRs are being targeted for screening and counseling, few studies have explored their beliefs about risk modification or preferences for risk counseling. Methods. To learn more about these beliefs, the authors conducted four focus groups among FDRs (n = 29). Results. Findings indicate misunderstanding about risk and interest in more information. For instance, the participants confused risk factors with causes, discounting scientific validity of risk-factor information if they knew a breast cancer victim without risk factors or with protective factors. Most FDRs thought lifestyle factors contributed to risk. The overwhelming majority thought they could reduce personal risk by lifestyle modifications. Most were not interested in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility, saying they would worry too much if they learned they had a mutated gene. According to the participants, lack of primary prevention techniques negates the value of genetic testing. Conclusion. If risk counseling for FDRs is to become more widespread, these exploratory findings should be addressed in research and program development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-103
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Cancer Education
Volume14
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1999

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
Counseling
Interviews
Breast Neoplasms
Genetic Testing
Life Style
Program Development
Primary Prevention
Research
Genes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Oncology

Cite this

Risk beliefs and interest in counseling : Focus-group interviews among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. / Ryan, Elizabeth L.; Skinner, Celette Sugg.

In: Journal of Cancer Education, Vol. 14, No. 2, 06.1999, p. 99-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9cb6ca85c7c84fdfbed2305ccab10708,
title = "Risk beliefs and interest in counseling: Focus-group interviews among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients",
abstract = "Background. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of breast cancer patients are at potential genetic risk for developing breast cancer. Although FDRs are being targeted for screening and counseling, few studies have explored their beliefs about risk modification or preferences for risk counseling. Methods. To learn more about these beliefs, the authors conducted four focus groups among FDRs (n = 29). Results. Findings indicate misunderstanding about risk and interest in more information. For instance, the participants confused risk factors with causes, discounting scientific validity of risk-factor information if they knew a breast cancer victim without risk factors or with protective factors. Most FDRs thought lifestyle factors contributed to risk. The overwhelming majority thought they could reduce personal risk by lifestyle modifications. Most were not interested in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility, saying they would worry too much if they learned they had a mutated gene. According to the participants, lack of primary prevention techniques negates the value of genetic testing. Conclusion. If risk counseling for FDRs is to become more widespread, these exploratory findings should be addressed in research and program development.",
author = "Ryan, {Elizabeth L.} and Skinner, {Celette Sugg}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "99--103",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Education",
issn = "0885-8195",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk beliefs and interest in counseling

T2 - Focus-group interviews among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients

AU - Ryan, Elizabeth L.

AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - Background. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of breast cancer patients are at potential genetic risk for developing breast cancer. Although FDRs are being targeted for screening and counseling, few studies have explored their beliefs about risk modification or preferences for risk counseling. Methods. To learn more about these beliefs, the authors conducted four focus groups among FDRs (n = 29). Results. Findings indicate misunderstanding about risk and interest in more information. For instance, the participants confused risk factors with causes, discounting scientific validity of risk-factor information if they knew a breast cancer victim without risk factors or with protective factors. Most FDRs thought lifestyle factors contributed to risk. The overwhelming majority thought they could reduce personal risk by lifestyle modifications. Most were not interested in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility, saying they would worry too much if they learned they had a mutated gene. According to the participants, lack of primary prevention techniques negates the value of genetic testing. Conclusion. If risk counseling for FDRs is to become more widespread, these exploratory findings should be addressed in research and program development.

AB - Background. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of breast cancer patients are at potential genetic risk for developing breast cancer. Although FDRs are being targeted for screening and counseling, few studies have explored their beliefs about risk modification or preferences for risk counseling. Methods. To learn more about these beliefs, the authors conducted four focus groups among FDRs (n = 29). Results. Findings indicate misunderstanding about risk and interest in more information. For instance, the participants confused risk factors with causes, discounting scientific validity of risk-factor information if they knew a breast cancer victim without risk factors or with protective factors. Most FDRs thought lifestyle factors contributed to risk. The overwhelming majority thought they could reduce personal risk by lifestyle modifications. Most were not interested in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility, saying they would worry too much if they learned they had a mutated gene. According to the participants, lack of primary prevention techniques negates the value of genetic testing. Conclusion. If risk counseling for FDRs is to become more widespread, these exploratory findings should be addressed in research and program development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033001298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033001298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10397486

AN - SCOPUS:0033001298

VL - 14

SP - 99

EP - 103

JO - Journal of Cancer Education

JF - Journal of Cancer Education

SN - 0885-8195

IS - 2

ER -