Risk of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with an unknown uterine scar

Dana Smith, Elizabeth Stringer, Catherine J. Vladutiu, Ashley Hickman Zink, Robert Strauss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the association of uterine rupture and previous incision type, either unknown or low transverse, among women who attempt a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study of 15,519 women with term singletons who attempted a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery. Odds ratios for the association between uterine incision location, either unknown or low transverse, and uterine rupture were estimated with the use of multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2002, 99 of the 15,519 women (0.64%) who attempted a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery experienced a uterine rupture. Pregnant women with an unknown scar had lower odds of uterine rupture (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.37) compared with women with a known low transverse scar. Other adverse maternal outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups of women.

CONCLUSION: Among this cohort, women with an unknown uterine incision who attempted a trial of labor were not at increased risk of uterine rupture compared with women with a known low transverse incision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume213
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Uterine Rupture
Cicatrix
Trial of Labor
Odds Ratio
Multicenter Studies
Observational Studies
Pregnant Women
Logistic Models
Mothers
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • trial of labor
  • unknown scar
  • uterine rupture
  • vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Risk of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with an unknown uterine scar. / Smith, Dana; Stringer, Elizabeth; Vladutiu, Catherine J.; Zink, Ashley Hickman; Strauss, Robert.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 213, No. 1, 01.07.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c5782916275414fb93c16491baaf157,
title = "Risk of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with an unknown uterine scar",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the association of uterine rupture and previous incision type, either unknown or low transverse, among women who attempt a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery.STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study of 15,519 women with term singletons who attempted a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery. Odds ratios for the association between uterine incision location, either unknown or low transverse, and uterine rupture were estimated with the use of multivariable logistic regression.RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2002, 99 of the 15,519 women (0.64{\%}) who attempted a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery experienced a uterine rupture. Pregnant women with an unknown scar had lower odds of uterine rupture (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.37-1.37) compared with women with a known low transverse scar. Other adverse maternal outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups of women.CONCLUSION: Among this cohort, women with an unknown uterine incision who attempted a trial of labor were not at increased risk of uterine rupture compared with women with a known low transverse incision.",
keywords = "trial of labor, unknown scar, uterine rupture, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery",
author = "Dana Smith and Elizabeth Stringer and Vladutiu, {Catherine J.} and Zink, {Ashley Hickman} and Robert Strauss",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "213",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with an unknown uterine scar

AU - Smith, Dana

AU - Stringer, Elizabeth

AU - Vladutiu, Catherine J.

AU - Zink, Ashley Hickman

AU - Strauss, Robert

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the association of uterine rupture and previous incision type, either unknown or low transverse, among women who attempt a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery.STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study of 15,519 women with term singletons who attempted a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery. Odds ratios for the association between uterine incision location, either unknown or low transverse, and uterine rupture were estimated with the use of multivariable logistic regression.RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2002, 99 of the 15,519 women (0.64%) who attempted a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery experienced a uterine rupture. Pregnant women with an unknown scar had lower odds of uterine rupture (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.37) compared with women with a known low transverse scar. Other adverse maternal outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups of women.CONCLUSION: Among this cohort, women with an unknown uterine incision who attempted a trial of labor were not at increased risk of uterine rupture compared with women with a known low transverse incision.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the association of uterine rupture and previous incision type, either unknown or low transverse, among women who attempt a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery.STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study of 15,519 women with term singletons who attempted a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery. Odds ratios for the association between uterine incision location, either unknown or low transverse, and uterine rupture were estimated with the use of multivariable logistic regression.RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2002, 99 of the 15,519 women (0.64%) who attempted a trial of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery experienced a uterine rupture. Pregnant women with an unknown scar had lower odds of uterine rupture (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.37) compared with women with a known low transverse scar. Other adverse maternal outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups of women.CONCLUSION: Among this cohort, women with an unknown uterine incision who attempted a trial of labor were not at increased risk of uterine rupture compared with women with a known low transverse incision.

KW - trial of labor

KW - unknown scar

KW - uterine rupture

KW - vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992058677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992058677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.056

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.056

M3 - Article

C2 - 25659467

AN - SCOPUS:84937524923

VL - 213

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 1

ER -