Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload

Dimitrios Stefanidis, Fikre Wang, James R. Korndorffer, J. Bruce Dunne, Daniel J. Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Intracorporeal suturing is one of the most difficult laparoscopic tasks. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of robotic assistance on novice suturing performance, safety, and workload in the operating room. Methods Medical students (n = 34), without prior laparoscopic suturing experience, were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved, randomized protocol. After viewing an instructional video, subjects were tested in intracorporeal suturing on two identical, live, porcine Nissen fundoplication models; they placed three gastrogastric sutures using conventional laparoscopic instruments in one model and using robotic assistance (da Vinci® ) in the other, in random order. Each knot was objectively scored based on time, accuracy, and security. Injuries to surrounding structures were recorded. Workload was assessed using the validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load index (TLX) questionnaire, which measures the subjects' self reported performance, effort, frustration, and mental, physical, and temporal demands of the task. Analysis was by paired t-test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Compared with laparoscopy, robotic assistance enabled subjects to suture faster (595 ± 22 s versus 459 ± 137 s, respectively; p < 0.001), achieve higher overall scores (0 ± 1 versus 95 ± 128, respectively; p < 0.001), and commit fewer errors per knot (1.15 ± 1.35 versus 0.05 ± 0.26, respectively; p < 0.001). Subjects' overall score did not improve between the first and third attempt for laparoscopic suturing (0 ± 0 versus 0 ± 0; p = NS) but improved significantly for robotic suturing (49 ± 100 versus 141 ± 152; p < 0.001). Moreover, subjects indicated on the NASA-TLX scale that the task was more difficult to perform with laparoscopic instruments compared with robotic assistance (99 ± 15 versus 57 ± 23; p < 0.001). Conclusions Compared with standard laparoscopy, robotic assistance significantly improved intracorporeal suturing performance and safety of novices in the operating room while decreasing their workload. Moreover, the robot significantly shortened the learning curve of this difficult task. Further study is needed to assess the value of robotic assistance for experienced surgeons, and validated robotic training curricula need to be developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-382
Number of pages6
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Robotics
Operating Rooms
Workload
Safety
United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Laparoscopy
Sutures
Fundoplication
Frustration
Learning Curve
Research Ethics Committees
Medical Students
Curriculum
Swine
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic suturing
  • Performance assessment
  • Robotic suturing
  • Simulation
  • Workload

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. / Stefanidis, Dimitrios; Wang, Fikre; Korndorffer, James R.; Dunne, J. Bruce; Scott, Daniel J.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 24, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 377-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f5b81a2779e44af29c200a9755ab045a,
title = "Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload",
abstract = "Background Intracorporeal suturing is one of the most difficult laparoscopic tasks. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of robotic assistance on novice suturing performance, safety, and workload in the operating room. Methods Medical students (n = 34), without prior laparoscopic suturing experience, were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved, randomized protocol. After viewing an instructional video, subjects were tested in intracorporeal suturing on two identical, live, porcine Nissen fundoplication models; they placed three gastrogastric sutures using conventional laparoscopic instruments in one model and using robotic assistance (da Vinci{\circledR} ) in the other, in random order. Each knot was objectively scored based on time, accuracy, and security. Injuries to surrounding structures were recorded. Workload was assessed using the validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load index (TLX) questionnaire, which measures the subjects' self reported performance, effort, frustration, and mental, physical, and temporal demands of the task. Analysis was by paired t-test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Compared with laparoscopy, robotic assistance enabled subjects to suture faster (595 ± 22 s versus 459 ± 137 s, respectively; p < 0.001), achieve higher overall scores (0 ± 1 versus 95 ± 128, respectively; p < 0.001), and commit fewer errors per knot (1.15 ± 1.35 versus 0.05 ± 0.26, respectively; p < 0.001). Subjects' overall score did not improve between the first and third attempt for laparoscopic suturing (0 ± 0 versus 0 ± 0; p = NS) but improved significantly for robotic suturing (49 ± 100 versus 141 ± 152; p < 0.001). Moreover, subjects indicated on the NASA-TLX scale that the task was more difficult to perform with laparoscopic instruments compared with robotic assistance (99 ± 15 versus 57 ± 23; p < 0.001). Conclusions Compared with standard laparoscopy, robotic assistance significantly improved intracorporeal suturing performance and safety of novices in the operating room while decreasing their workload. Moreover, the robot significantly shortened the learning curve of this difficult task. Further study is needed to assess the value of robotic assistance for experienced surgeons, and validated robotic training curricula need to be developed.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic suturing, Performance assessment, Robotic suturing, Simulation, Workload",
author = "Dimitrios Stefanidis and Fikre Wang and Korndorffer, {James R.} and Dunne, {J. Bruce} and Scott, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-009-0578-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "377--382",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload

AU - Stefanidis, Dimitrios

AU - Wang, Fikre

AU - Korndorffer, James R.

AU - Dunne, J. Bruce

AU - Scott, Daniel J.

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Background Intracorporeal suturing is one of the most difficult laparoscopic tasks. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of robotic assistance on novice suturing performance, safety, and workload in the operating room. Methods Medical students (n = 34), without prior laparoscopic suturing experience, were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved, randomized protocol. After viewing an instructional video, subjects were tested in intracorporeal suturing on two identical, live, porcine Nissen fundoplication models; they placed three gastrogastric sutures using conventional laparoscopic instruments in one model and using robotic assistance (da Vinci® ) in the other, in random order. Each knot was objectively scored based on time, accuracy, and security. Injuries to surrounding structures were recorded. Workload was assessed using the validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load index (TLX) questionnaire, which measures the subjects' self reported performance, effort, frustration, and mental, physical, and temporal demands of the task. Analysis was by paired t-test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Compared with laparoscopy, robotic assistance enabled subjects to suture faster (595 ± 22 s versus 459 ± 137 s, respectively; p < 0.001), achieve higher overall scores (0 ± 1 versus 95 ± 128, respectively; p < 0.001), and commit fewer errors per knot (1.15 ± 1.35 versus 0.05 ± 0.26, respectively; p < 0.001). Subjects' overall score did not improve between the first and third attempt for laparoscopic suturing (0 ± 0 versus 0 ± 0; p = NS) but improved significantly for robotic suturing (49 ± 100 versus 141 ± 152; p < 0.001). Moreover, subjects indicated on the NASA-TLX scale that the task was more difficult to perform with laparoscopic instruments compared with robotic assistance (99 ± 15 versus 57 ± 23; p < 0.001). Conclusions Compared with standard laparoscopy, robotic assistance significantly improved intracorporeal suturing performance and safety of novices in the operating room while decreasing their workload. Moreover, the robot significantly shortened the learning curve of this difficult task. Further study is needed to assess the value of robotic assistance for experienced surgeons, and validated robotic training curricula need to be developed.

AB - Background Intracorporeal suturing is one of the most difficult laparoscopic tasks. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of robotic assistance on novice suturing performance, safety, and workload in the operating room. Methods Medical students (n = 34), without prior laparoscopic suturing experience, were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved, randomized protocol. After viewing an instructional video, subjects were tested in intracorporeal suturing on two identical, live, porcine Nissen fundoplication models; they placed three gastrogastric sutures using conventional laparoscopic instruments in one model and using robotic assistance (da Vinci® ) in the other, in random order. Each knot was objectively scored based on time, accuracy, and security. Injuries to surrounding structures were recorded. Workload was assessed using the validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load index (TLX) questionnaire, which measures the subjects' self reported performance, effort, frustration, and mental, physical, and temporal demands of the task. Analysis was by paired t-test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Compared with laparoscopy, robotic assistance enabled subjects to suture faster (595 ± 22 s versus 459 ± 137 s, respectively; p < 0.001), achieve higher overall scores (0 ± 1 versus 95 ± 128, respectively; p < 0.001), and commit fewer errors per knot (1.15 ± 1.35 versus 0.05 ± 0.26, respectively; p < 0.001). Subjects' overall score did not improve between the first and third attempt for laparoscopic suturing (0 ± 0 versus 0 ± 0; p = NS) but improved significantly for robotic suturing (49 ± 100 versus 141 ± 152; p < 0.001). Moreover, subjects indicated on the NASA-TLX scale that the task was more difficult to perform with laparoscopic instruments compared with robotic assistance (99 ± 15 versus 57 ± 23; p < 0.001). Conclusions Compared with standard laparoscopy, robotic assistance significantly improved intracorporeal suturing performance and safety of novices in the operating room while decreasing their workload. Moreover, the robot significantly shortened the learning curve of this difficult task. Further study is needed to assess the value of robotic assistance for experienced surgeons, and validated robotic training curricula need to be developed.

KW - Laparoscopic suturing

KW - Performance assessment

KW - Robotic suturing

KW - Simulation

KW - Workload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649182479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649182479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-009-0578-0

DO - 10.1007/s00464-009-0578-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 19536599

AN - SCOPUS:77649182479

VL - 24

SP - 377

EP - 382

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 2

ER -