Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Andrei Pugachev, Jonathan G. Li, Arthur L. Boyer, Steven L. Hancock, Quynh Thu Le, Sarah S. Donaldson, Lei Xing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

114 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to examine the potential benefits of noncoplanar intensity-modulated beams. Methods and Materials: A beam orientation optimization algorithm was implemented. For this purpose, system variables were divided into two groups: beam position (gantry and table angles) and beam profile (beamlet weights). Simulated annealing was used for beam orientation optimization and the simultaneous iterative inverse treatment planning algorithm (SIITP) for beam intensity profile optimization. Three clinical cases were studied: a localized prostate cancer, a nasopharyngeal cancer, and a paraspinal tumor. Nine fields were used for all treatments. For each case, 3 types of treatment plan optimization were performed: (1) beam intensity profiles were optimized for 9 equiangular spaced coplanar beams; (2) orientations and intensity profiles were optimized for 9 coplanar beams; (3) orientations and intensity profiles were optimized for 9 noncoplanar beams. Results: For the localized prostate case, all 3 types of optimization described above resulted in dose distributions of a similar quality. For the nasopharynx case, optimized noncoplanar beams provided a significant gain in the gross tumor volume coverage. For the paraspinal case, orientation optimization using noncoplanar beams resulted in better kidney sparing and improved gross tumor volume coverage. Conclusion: The sensitivity of an IMRT treatment plan with respect to the selection of beam orientations varies from site to site. For some cases, the choice of beam orientations is important even when the number of beams is as large as 9. Noncoplanar beams provide an additional degree of freedom for IMRT treatment optimization and may allow for notable improvement in the quality of some complicated plans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-560
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2001

Fingerprint

radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
optimization
Tumor Burden
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Nasopharynx
Quality Improvement
Prostate
Prostatic Neoplasms
profiles
tumors
Kidney
Weights and Measures
cancer
Neoplasms
gantry cranes
simulated annealing
kidneys
planning

Keywords

  • Beam orientation
  • IMRT
  • Intensity modulation
  • Inverse planning
  • Optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Pugachev, A., Li, J. G., Boyer, A. L., Hancock, S. L., Le, Q. T., Donaldson, S. S., & Xing, L. (2001). Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 50(2), 551-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01502-4

Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. / Pugachev, Andrei; Li, Jonathan G.; Boyer, Arthur L.; Hancock, Steven L.; Le, Quynh Thu; Donaldson, Sarah S.; Xing, Lei.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 50, No. 2, 01.06.2001, p. 551-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pugachev, Andrei ; Li, Jonathan G. ; Boyer, Arthur L. ; Hancock, Steven L. ; Le, Quynh Thu ; Donaldson, Sarah S. ; Xing, Lei. / Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2001 ; Vol. 50, No. 2. pp. 551-560.
@article{c4db4102963c47419a100b4638a653a4,
title = "Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to examine the potential benefits of noncoplanar intensity-modulated beams. Methods and Materials: A beam orientation optimization algorithm was implemented. For this purpose, system variables were divided into two groups: beam position (gantry and table angles) and beam profile (beamlet weights). Simulated annealing was used for beam orientation optimization and the simultaneous iterative inverse treatment planning algorithm (SIITP) for beam intensity profile optimization. Three clinical cases were studied: a localized prostate cancer, a nasopharyngeal cancer, and a paraspinal tumor. Nine fields were used for all treatments. For each case, 3 types of treatment plan optimization were performed: (1) beam intensity profiles were optimized for 9 equiangular spaced coplanar beams; (2) orientations and intensity profiles were optimized for 9 coplanar beams; (3) orientations and intensity profiles were optimized for 9 noncoplanar beams. Results: For the localized prostate case, all 3 types of optimization described above resulted in dose distributions of a similar quality. For the nasopharynx case, optimized noncoplanar beams provided a significant gain in the gross tumor volume coverage. For the paraspinal case, orientation optimization using noncoplanar beams resulted in better kidney sparing and improved gross tumor volume coverage. Conclusion: The sensitivity of an IMRT treatment plan with respect to the selection of beam orientations varies from site to site. For some cases, the choice of beam orientations is important even when the number of beams is as large as 9. Noncoplanar beams provide an additional degree of freedom for IMRT treatment optimization and may allow for notable improvement in the quality of some complicated plans.",
keywords = "Beam orientation, IMRT, Intensity modulation, Inverse planning, Optimization",
author = "Andrei Pugachev and Li, {Jonathan G.} and Boyer, {Arthur L.} and Hancock, {Steven L.} and Le, {Quynh Thu} and Donaldson, {Sarah S.} and Lei Xing",
year = "2001",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01502-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "551--560",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy

AU - Pugachev, Andrei

AU - Li, Jonathan G.

AU - Boyer, Arthur L.

AU - Hancock, Steven L.

AU - Le, Quynh Thu

AU - Donaldson, Sarah S.

AU - Xing, Lei

PY - 2001/6/1

Y1 - 2001/6/1

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to examine the potential benefits of noncoplanar intensity-modulated beams. Methods and Materials: A beam orientation optimization algorithm was implemented. For this purpose, system variables were divided into two groups: beam position (gantry and table angles) and beam profile (beamlet weights). Simulated annealing was used for beam orientation optimization and the simultaneous iterative inverse treatment planning algorithm (SIITP) for beam intensity profile optimization. Three clinical cases were studied: a localized prostate cancer, a nasopharyngeal cancer, and a paraspinal tumor. Nine fields were used for all treatments. For each case, 3 types of treatment plan optimization were performed: (1) beam intensity profiles were optimized for 9 equiangular spaced coplanar beams; (2) orientations and intensity profiles were optimized for 9 coplanar beams; (3) orientations and intensity profiles were optimized for 9 noncoplanar beams. Results: For the localized prostate case, all 3 types of optimization described above resulted in dose distributions of a similar quality. For the nasopharynx case, optimized noncoplanar beams provided a significant gain in the gross tumor volume coverage. For the paraspinal case, orientation optimization using noncoplanar beams resulted in better kidney sparing and improved gross tumor volume coverage. Conclusion: The sensitivity of an IMRT treatment plan with respect to the selection of beam orientations varies from site to site. For some cases, the choice of beam orientations is important even when the number of beams is as large as 9. Noncoplanar beams provide an additional degree of freedom for IMRT treatment optimization and may allow for notable improvement in the quality of some complicated plans.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to examine the potential benefits of noncoplanar intensity-modulated beams. Methods and Materials: A beam orientation optimization algorithm was implemented. For this purpose, system variables were divided into two groups: beam position (gantry and table angles) and beam profile (beamlet weights). Simulated annealing was used for beam orientation optimization and the simultaneous iterative inverse treatment planning algorithm (SIITP) for beam intensity profile optimization. Three clinical cases were studied: a localized prostate cancer, a nasopharyngeal cancer, and a paraspinal tumor. Nine fields were used for all treatments. For each case, 3 types of treatment plan optimization were performed: (1) beam intensity profiles were optimized for 9 equiangular spaced coplanar beams; (2) orientations and intensity profiles were optimized for 9 coplanar beams; (3) orientations and intensity profiles were optimized for 9 noncoplanar beams. Results: For the localized prostate case, all 3 types of optimization described above resulted in dose distributions of a similar quality. For the nasopharynx case, optimized noncoplanar beams provided a significant gain in the gross tumor volume coverage. For the paraspinal case, orientation optimization using noncoplanar beams resulted in better kidney sparing and improved gross tumor volume coverage. Conclusion: The sensitivity of an IMRT treatment plan with respect to the selection of beam orientations varies from site to site. For some cases, the choice of beam orientations is important even when the number of beams is as large as 9. Noncoplanar beams provide an additional degree of freedom for IMRT treatment optimization and may allow for notable improvement in the quality of some complicated plans.

KW - Beam orientation

KW - IMRT

KW - Intensity modulation

KW - Inverse planning

KW - Optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035370733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035370733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01502-4

DO - 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01502-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 11380245

AN - SCOPUS:0035370733

VL - 50

SP - 551

EP - 560

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 2

ER -